• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Mind the overlap: how system problems contribute to cognitive failure and diagnostic errors.注意重叠部分:系统问题如何导致认知失误和诊断错误。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Sep 25;5(3):151-156. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0014.
2
"First, know thyself": cognition and error in medicine.“首先,认识你自己”:医学中的认知与错误
Acta Diabetol. 2016 Apr;53(2):169-75. doi: 10.1007/s00592-015-0762-8. Epub 2015 May 5.
3
Diagnosing diagnostic error.诊断诊断错误。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013 Oct;43(9):227-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.07.002.
4
[Cognitive errors in diagnostic decision making].[诊断决策中的认知错误]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017 Oct;167(13-14):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0570-6. Epub 2017 May 23.
5
Are We Right When We're Certain? Overconfidence in Medicine.我们确定时就正确吗?医学中的过度自信。
R I Med J (2013). 2020 Mar 2;103(2):11-12.
6
Steps to Misdiagnosis: Dissecting an Emergency Visit.误诊步骤:剖析一次急诊就诊。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jun;158(6):989-990. doi: 10.1177/0194599818766314. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
7
Diagnostic errors and flaws in clinical reasoning: mechanisms and prevention in practice.临床推理中的诊断错误和缺陷:实践中的机制和预防。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Oct 23;142:w13706. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13706. eCollection 2012.
8
The development and validation of the clinicians' awareness towards cognitive errors (CATChES) in clinical decision making questionnaire tool.临床决策问卷工具中临床医生对认知错误的认知(CATChES)的开发与验证
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0897-0.
9
Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine.过度自信作为医学诊断错误的一个原因。
Am J Med. 2008 May;121(5 Suppl):S2-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.01.001.
10
[The mistakes that we make, also make us old].我们所犯的错误,也让我们变老。
Rev Med Suisse. 2012 Jan 25;8(325):192.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of a bundle to improve diagnosis in hospitalized patients: lessons learned.实施一套改善住院患者诊断的措施:经验教训
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Oct 18;12(1):68-73. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0099. eCollection 2025 Feb 1.
2
Identifying Facilitators and Inhibitors of Shared Understanding: An Ethnography of Diagnosis Communication in Acute Medical Settings.识别共享理解的促进因素和障碍:急性医疗环境中诊断沟通的民族志研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14180. doi: 10.1111/hex.14180.
3
Managing Interruptions to Improve Diagnostic Decision-Making: Strategies and Recommended Research Agenda.管理中断以改善诊断决策:策略和推荐的研究议程。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1526-1531. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-08019-w. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
4
Clinical Reasoning in Forensic Psychiatry: Concepts, Processes, and Pitfalls.法医精神病学中的临床推理:概念、过程与陷阱
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 5;12:691377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.691377. eCollection 2021.
5
Referral communication for pediatric intensive care unit admission and the diagnosis of critically ill children: A pilot ethnography.儿科重症监护病房入院和危重症儿童诊断的转诊沟通:一项试点民族志研究。
J Crit Care. 2021 Jun;63:246-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
Understanding the roles of three academic communities in a prospective learning health ecosystem for diagnostic excellence.了解三个学术团体在一个追求卓越诊断的前瞻性学习健康生态系统中的作用。
Learn Health Syst. 2019 Dec 2;4(1):e210204. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10204. eCollection 2020.
7
Using Voogle to Search Within Patient Records in the VA Corporate Data Warehouse.在退伍军人事务部企业数据仓库中使用Voogle在患者记录内进行搜索。
Fed Pract. 2019 Nov;36(11):518-523.
8
Electronic health records, communication, and data sharing: challenges and opportunities for improving the diagnostic process.电子健康记录、通信与数据共享:改善诊断流程面临的挑战与机遇
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Aug 27;6(3):241-248. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0036.

本文引用的文献

1
Focused Ethnography of Diagnosis in Academic Medical Centers.学术医疗中心诊断的聚焦人种志研究。
J Hosp Med. 2018 Oct 1;13(10):668-672. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2966. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
2
Use of a novel, modified fishbone diagram to analyze diagnostic errors.使用一种新颖的、改良的鱼骨图来分析诊断错误。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 Jun 1;1(2):167-171. doi: 10.1515/dx-2013-0040.
3
Task errors by emergency physicians are associated with interruptions, multitasking, fatigue and working memory capacity: a prospective, direct observation study.急诊医师的任务错误与中断、多任务处理、疲劳和工作记忆容量有关:一项前瞻性、直接观察研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):655-663. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007333. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
4
Dual-process cognitive interventions to enhance diagnostic reasoning: a systematic review.增强诊断推理的双过程认知干预:一项系统综述
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Oct;25(10):808-20. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004417. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
5
Improving Diagnosis in Health Care--The Next Imperative for Patient Safety.改善医疗保健中的诊断——保障患者安全的下一项当务之急。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2493-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1512241. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
6
The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine.医学诊断错误的发生率。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii21-ii27. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001615. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
7
The pursuit of better diagnostic performance: a human factors perspective.追求更好的诊断性能:以人为因素为视角。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii1-ii5. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001827. Epub 2013 May 23.
8
Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic.风险认知的差异:为什么继续存在不必要的导尿使用问题的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 26;13:151. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-151.
9
Seen through their eyes: residents' reflections on the cognitive and contextual components of diagnostic errors in medicine.从他们的视角看问题:住院医师对医学诊断错误的认知和背景因素的反思。
Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826742c9.
10
Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review.认知干预以减少诊断错误:叙述性综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):535-57. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000149. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

注意重叠部分:系统问题如何导致认知失误和诊断错误。

Mind the overlap: how system problems contribute to cognitive failure and diagnostic errors.

作者信息

Gupta Ashwin, Harrod Molly, Quinn Martha, Manojlovich Milisa, Fowler Karen E, Singh Hardeep, Saint Sanjay, Chopra Vineet

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2303, USA.

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0624, USA.

出版信息

Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Sep 25;5(3):151-156. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0014.

DOI:10.1515/dx-2018-0014
PMID:30007056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6743477/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

: Traditionally, research has examined systems- and cognitive-based sources of diagnostic error as individual entities. However, half of all errors have origins in both domains.

METHODS

: We conducted a focused ethnography of inpatient physicians at two academic institutions to understand how systems-based problems contribute to cognitive errors in diagnosis. Medicine teams were observed on rounds and during post-round work after which interviews were conducted. Field notes related to the diagnostic process and the work system were recorded, and findings were organized into themes. Using deductive content analysis, themes were categorized based on a published taxonomy to link systems-based contributions and cognitive errors such as faulty data gathering, information processing, data verification and errors associated with multiple domains.

RESULTS

: Observations, focus groups and interviews of 10 teams were conducted between January 2016 and April 2017. The following themes were identified: (1) challenges with interdisciplinary communication and communication within the electronic medical record contributed to faulty data gathering; (2) organizational structures such as the operation of consulting services in silos promoted faulty information processing; (3) care handoffs led to faulty data verification, and; (4) interruptions, time constraints, and a cluttered physical environment negatively influenced multiple cognitive domains.

CONCLUSIONS

: Systems-based factors often facilitate and promote cognitive problems in diagnosis. Linking systems-based contributions to downstream cognitive impacts and intervening on both in tandem may help prevent diagnostic errors.

摘要

引言

传统上,研究将基于系统和认知的诊断错误来源作为单独的实体进行考察。然而,所有错误中有一半源于这两个领域。

方法

我们对两家学术机构的住院医师进行了聚焦人种志研究,以了解基于系统的问题如何导致诊断中的认知错误。观察医疗团队查房及查房后的工作,之后进行访谈。记录与诊断过程和工作系统相关的实地笔记,并将研究结果整理成主题。使用演绎性内容分析,根据已发表的分类法对主题进行分类,以将基于系统的因素与认知错误联系起来,如错误的数据收集、信息处理、数据验证以及与多个领域相关的错误。

结果

在2016年1月至2017年4月期间,对10个团队进行了观察、焦点小组讨论和访谈。确定了以下主题:(1)跨学科沟通以及电子病历内沟通方面的挑战导致错误的数据收集;(2)诸如咨询服务各自为政的组织结构促使错误的信息处理;(3)护理交接导致错误的数据验证,以及(4)干扰、时间限制和杂乱的物理环境对多个认知领域产生负面影响。

结论

基于系统的因素常常促成并加剧诊断中的认知问题。将基于系统的因素与下游认知影响联系起来,并同时对两者进行干预,可能有助于预防诊断错误。