• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士主导的初级卫生保健教育干预对改善糖尿病、高血压和高血脂患者慢性病管理的效果:系统评价。

Effectiveness of primary healthcare educational interventions undertaken by nurses to improve chronic disease management in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review.

机构信息

Stress and Health Research Group, Faculty of Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici B, Carrer de la Fortuna, Campus de la UAB 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain; Escola Universitària d'Infermeria i Teràpia Ocupacional (EUIT), Carrer de la Riba, 90, 08221 Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.

Stress and Health Research Group, Faculty of Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici B, Carrer de la Fortuna, Campus de la UAB 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Oct;86:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.06.016
PMID:30007585
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are important chronic health problems that are becoming increasingly frequent worldwide. Educational interventions are a challenge for health teams. Nurses play a major role in overall health by providing educational interventions to help improve self-management outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of primary health care educational interventions undertaken by nurses to improve metabolic control and/or chronic disease management in individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

The methodology drew on systematic review without meta-analyses, methods developed by the Cochrane Collaboration. Elements related to content were chosen following the PRISMA statement. The databases of Pubmed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cuiden, Enfispo, and the Cochrane Library were consulted. Reference lists from relevant articles were also examined for additional references. Three authors independently assessed eligibility of studies for inclusion. A review of randomised controlled trials published between 2000 and 2015 was undertaken. Furthermore, an analysis of selected studies was carried out, in which nurses actively participated in the implementation of educational interventions in primary health care centres in order to improve control and chronic disease management in Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia.

RESULTS

Out of the 20 studies included in the systematic review, one had a low risk of bias, 14 an uncertain risk of bias, and five a high risk of bias. Although several studies showed significant changes in the measured variables, few significant differences were maintained over time, observed only in metabolic indicators and clinical variables more than in lifestyle behaviour. In addition, although most of the studies dealt with issues related to lifestyle behaviours such as nutrition, physical activity, and tobacco and alcohol use, few measured changes after the intervention. Finally, the difficulty in comparing the studies included in the review laid in the heterogeneity in educational strategies, the evaluation methods used, and the disparity of assessment tools, which made it difficult to establish the characteristics of the most effective interventions during the time of treatment for diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are numerous interventions that aim to control diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, the observation was that the results obtained are difficult to maintain over time. Therefore, it is necessary to continue to create high-quality interventions, with a low risk of bias and based on solid theoretical frameworks, not only to treat current symptoms of the disease but also to help prevent cardiovascular disease.

摘要

背景

糖尿病、高血压和高胆固醇血症是全球日益普遍的重要慢性健康问题。教育干预是卫生团队面临的挑战。护士通过提供教育干预措施,在整体健康中发挥着重要作用,以帮助改善自我管理结果。

目的

评估护士在初级卫生保健中进行的教育干预措施,以改善 2 型糖尿病、高血压和高胆固醇血症患者的代谢控制和/或慢性病管理。

方法

该方法借鉴了无荟萃分析的系统评价,方法由 Cochrane 协作组织制定。根据 PRISMA 声明选择与内容相关的要素。检索了 Pubmed、Web of Science、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Cuiden、Enfispo 和 Cochrane 图书馆的数据库。还检查了相关文章的参考文献列表以获取其他参考文献。三位作者独立评估研究纳入的资格。对 2000 年至 2015 年期间发表的随机对照试验进行了综述。此外,还对选定的研究进行了分析,这些研究中护士积极参与初级卫生保健中心的教育干预措施的实施,以改善 2 型糖尿病、高血压和高胆固醇血症的控制和慢性病管理。

结果

在系统评价中纳入的 20 项研究中,有 1 项研究的偏倚风险较低,14 项研究的偏倚风险不确定,5 项研究的偏倚风险较高。尽管几项研究显示测量变量有显著变化,但很少有研究能长时间保持差异,仅在代谢指标和临床变量上观察到,而在生活方式行为上则没有。此外,尽管大多数研究涉及营养、身体活动、烟草和酒精使用等与生活方式行为相关的问题,但很少有研究在干预后测量到变化。最后,综述中纳入的研究之间的比较困难在于教育策略、使用的评估方法和评估工具的差异,这使得难以确定在治疗糖尿病、高血压和高胆固醇血症期间最有效的干预措施的特征。

结论

尽管有许多旨在控制糖尿病、高血压和高胆固醇血症的干预措施,但观察结果表明,获得的结果难以长时间维持。因此,有必要继续创建高质量的干预措施,这些措施具有低偏倚风险,并基于坚实的理论框架,不仅要治疗疾病的当前症状,还要帮助预防心血管疾病。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of primary healthcare educational interventions undertaken by nurses to improve chronic disease management in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review.护士主导的初级卫生保健教育干预对改善糖尿病、高血压和高血脂患者慢性病管理的效果:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Oct;86:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
2
3
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
4
5
6
[Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary health care and outpatient community settings].[改善初级卫生保健和门诊社区环境中糖尿病管理的干预措施]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Jan 28;164(5):607-9.
7
The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review.反馈教学法对慢性病患者健康教育中依从性和自我管理的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan;14(1):210-47. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296.
8
The efficacy of tailored interventions for self-management outcomes of type 2 diabetes, hypertension or heart disease: a systematic review.针对 2 型糖尿病、高血压或心脏病自我管理结局的定制干预措施的疗效:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Mar;68(3):496-510. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05860.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
9
Theory-based self-management educational interventions on patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于理论的2型糖尿病患者自我管理教育干预措施:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Apr;73(4):812-833. doi: 10.1111/jan.13163. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
10
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic care provision in general practices and association with patient level outcomes: a nationwide cohort study.全科医疗中的慢性病护理及其与患者层面结局的关联:一项全国性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 7;23(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04239-z.
2
Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Organ Donation and Transplantation Among Nursing Students: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study.护生对器官捐献与移植的认知和态度:一项多中心横断面研究。
Nurs Rep. 2025 May 22;15(6):181. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060181.
3
Continuous nursing care improving outcomes of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.
连续护理可改善经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的预后。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 29;103(48):e40807. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040807.
4
Assessing perceptions of nursing knowledge, attitudes, and practices in diabetes management within Chinese healthcare settings.评估中国医疗环境中护理人员对糖尿病管理的知识、态度和实践的认知。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 12;12:1426339. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1426339. eCollection 2024.
5
The Role of Family or Community Nurse in Dealing with Frail and Chronic Patients in Italy: A Scoping Review.意大利家庭或社区护士在照料体弱和慢性病患者中的作用:一项范围综述
Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Jun 16;9(3):81. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9030081.
6
Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review.运用慢性病照护模式考察基层医疗环境中的护理流程:一项伞式综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 4;24(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3.
7
Effectiveness of integrated care interventions for patients with long-term conditions: a review of systematic reviews.针对慢性病患者的综合护理干预措施的有效性:系统评价的综述
Integr Healthc J. 2022 Jun 16;4(1):e000083. doi: 10.1136/ihj-2021-000083. eCollection 2022.
8
Application of Interprofessional Education Model to University Pre-Licensure Health Students in the Management of Chronic Care Conditions in Zambia.跨专业教育模式在赞比亚针对大学执照前健康专业学生的慢性病管理中的应用。
Med J Zambia. 2022;49(2):185-197. doi: 10.55320/mjz.49.2.1118.
9
The Role of the Person Focused IARA Model in Reducing Anxiety and Improving Body Awareness and Illness Management in Diabetics with Acquired Lipodystrophy: A Mixed-Method Study.以患者为中心的IARA模型在减轻获得性脂肪营养不良糖尿病患者焦虑、改善身体意识和疾病管理方面的作用:一项混合方法研究。
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):1865. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111865.
10
The Impact of eHealth Interventions on the Improvement of Self-Care in Chronic Patients: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.电子健康干预对慢性病患者自我护理改善的影响:系统评价综述
Life (Basel). 2022 Aug 17;12(8):1253. doi: 10.3390/life12081253.