• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将健康纳入政治行为研究:投票率和党派关系的证据

Incorporating Health into Studies of Political Behavior: Evidence for Turnout and Partisanship.

作者信息

Pacheco Julianna, Fletcher Jason

机构信息

Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Iowa.

Associate Professor of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

Polit Res Q. 2015 Mar;68(1):104-116. doi: 10.1177/1065912914563548. Epub 2014 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1177/1065912914563548
PMID:30008544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6042216/
Abstract

We argue that research on political behavior, including political participation, public opinion, policy responsiveness, and political inequality will be strengthened by studying the role of health. We then provide evidence that health matters for voter turnout and partisanship. Using the General Social Survey (GSS) and The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), we find that people who report poor health are less likely to vote and identify with the Republican Party. Moreover, the effects of health on voter turnout and partisanship appear to have both developmental and contemporaneous components. Taken together, our findings suggest that may have significant .

摘要

我们认为,通过研究健康的作用,对政治行为的研究,包括政治参与、公众舆论、政策响应和政治不平等,将会得到加强。然后我们提供证据表明,健康对选民投票率和党派归属至关重要。利用综合社会调查(GSS)和青少年健康全国纵向研究(Add Health),我们发现,报告健康状况不佳的人投票的可能性较小,且不太认同共和党。此外,健康对选民投票率和党派归属的影响似乎既有发展性成分,也有同时期成分。综合来看,我们的研究结果表明, 可能具有重大 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df02/6042216/99d4358bf632/nihms979500f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df02/6042216/6116dace3203/nihms979500f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df02/6042216/99d4358bf632/nihms979500f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df02/6042216/6116dace3203/nihms979500f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df02/6042216/99d4358bf632/nihms979500f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Incorporating Health into Studies of Political Behavior: Evidence for Turnout and Partisanship.将健康纳入政治行为研究:投票率和党派关系的证据
Polit Res Q. 2015 Mar;68(1):104-116. doi: 10.1177/1065912914563548. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
2
The Asian American Vote in 2020: Indicators of Turnout and Vote Choice.2020年亚裔美国人的投票情况:投票率及投票选择指标
Polit Behav. 2022 Dec 25:1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11109-022-09844-9.
3
COVID-19 pandemic and political participation in Lagos, Nigeria.COVID-19疫情与尼日利亚拉各斯的政治参与
SN Soc Sci. 2021;1(6):146. doi: 10.1007/s43545-021-00161-2. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
4
400 million voting records show profound racial and geographic disparities in voter turnout in the United States.4 亿张选票记录显示,美国选民投票率存在深刻的种族和地域差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 8;17(6):e0268134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268134. eCollection 2022.
5
Promoting Voter Turnout: an Unanticipated Impact of Early-Childhood Preventive Interventions.提高选民投票率:幼儿预防性干预措施的意外影响。
Prev Sci. 2022 Feb;23(2):192-203. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01275-y. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
6
The Bodies Politic: Chronic Health Conditions and Voter Turnout in the 2008 Election.政治实体:2008年选举中的慢性健康状况与选民投票率
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Dec;40(6):1115-55. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3424450. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
7
Analysing the relationship between voter turnout and health in Ireland.分析爱尔兰选民投票率与健康之间的关系。
Ir Med J. 2007 Sep;100(8):suppl 56-8.
8
Absolutely Relative: How Education Shapes Voter Turnout in the United States.绝对相对:教育如何塑造美国的选民投票率
Soc Indic Res. 2023 May 28:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11205-023-03146-1.
9
The relationship between the lifestyle health index and voter turnout during the 2020 United States presidential election in the context of regional cultures.在区域文化背景下,2020年美国总统大选期间生活方式健康指数与选民投票率之间的关系。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Aug 15;8:100534. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100534. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Exploring the relationship between political partisanship and COVID-19 vaccination rate.探讨政治党派立场与 COVID-19 疫苗接种率之间的关系。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Mar 14;45(1):91-98. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab364.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of health and health systems in shaping political engagement and rebuilding trust in democratic institutions.健康及卫生系统在塑造政治参与和重建对民主体制的信任方面所发挥的作用。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 May 14;53:101326. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101326. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Voting in a Pandemic: COVID-19 and Primary Turnout in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.疫情期间的投票:威斯康星州密尔沃基市的新冠疫情与初选投票率
Urban Aff Rev Thousand Oaks Calif. 2022 Mar;58(2):597-613. doi: 10.1177/10780874211005016.
3
Health Equity and the Dynamism of Structural Racism and Public Policy.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic Status and Health in Childhood: The Origins of the Gradient.儿童时期的经济状况与健康:梯度的起源。
Am Econ Rev. 2002;92(5):1308-34. doi: 10.1257/000282802762024520.
2
Capacity to vote in persons with dementia and the elderly.痴呆症患者及老年人的投票能力。
Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;2011:941041. doi: 10.4061/2011/941041. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
3
US opinions on health determinants and social policy as health policy.美国对健康决定因素和社会政策作为健康政策的看法。
健康公平与结构性种族主义和公共政策的动态关系。
Milbank Q. 2022 Sep;100(3):628-649. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12581. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
The relationship between health and political ideology begins in childhood.健康与政治意识形态之间的关系始于童年时期。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Aug 24;19:101214. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101214. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Chronic health conditions and voter turnout: Results from the 2012 United States presidential election.慢性健康状况与选民投票率:2012年美国总统大选的结果
World Med Health Policy. 2021 Jun;13(2):313-327. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.454. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
Communicating safety precautions can help maintain in-person voter turnout during a pandemic.宣传安全预防措施有助于在疫情期间维持亲自投票的选民投票率。
Elect Stud. 2022 Feb;75:102421. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102421. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
7
Politics is making us sick: The negative impact of political engagement on public health during the Trump administration.政治让我们生病:特朗普政府时期政治参与对公众健康的负面影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0262022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262022. eCollection 2022.
8
Health, Wealth, and Voting Trajectories in Later Life.健康、财富与晚年的投票轨迹。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Apr 1;77(4):827-837. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab191.
9
Equity at the ballot box: Health as a resource for political participation among low-income workers in two United States cities.投票箱前的公平:健康作为美国两个城市低收入工人政治参与的一种资源
Front Polit Sci. 2021 Jan;2. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2020.601323. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
10
Viewing the US presidential electoral map through the lens of public health.从公共卫生角度看美国总统选举地图。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 21;16(7):e0254001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254001. eCollection 2021.
Am J Public Health. 2011 Sep;101(9):1655-63. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300217. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
4
Participation among adults with disability: the role of the urban environment.残疾人的参与:城市环境的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 May;72(10):1674-84. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.025. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
5
Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell us.美国健康中的社会经济差异:模式告诉我们的。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S186-96. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.166082. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
6
Socioeconomic and race/ethnic differences in daily salivary cortisol profiles: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.社会经济地位和种族/民族差异对唾液皮质醇水平的影响:动脉粥样硬化的多民族研究。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Jul;35(6):932-43. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
7
Role of cardiac disease severity in the predictive value of anxiety for all-cause mortality.心脏病严重程度在焦虑对全因死亡率的预测价值中的作用。
Psychosom Med. 2010 Jan;72(1):9-15. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181c64fc0. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
8
A commentary on Marja Jylhä's "What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model"(69:3, 2009, 307-316).关于 Marja Jylhä 的“自评健康及其为何能预测死亡率?建立统一的概念性模型”一文的评论(69:3,2009 年,第 307-316 页)。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(5):652-4; discussion 655-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
9
What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model.自评健康及其预测死亡率的原因是什么?走向统一的概念模型。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Aug;69(3):307-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
10
Reproducing inequalities: luck, wallets, and the enduring effects of childhood health.重现不平等:运气、财富与童年健康的持久影响。
Demography. 2006 Nov;43(4):587-615. doi: 10.1353/dem.2006.0036.