• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Equity at the ballot box: Health as a resource for political participation among low-income workers in two United States cities.

作者信息

McGuire Cydney M, Gollust Sarah E, De Marco Molly, Durfee Thomas, Wolfson Julian, Caspi Caitlin E

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Polit Sci. 2021 Jan;2. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2020.601323. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

DOI:10.3389/fpos.2020.601323
PMID:34622245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8494427/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac93/8494427/e9047cc0910f/nihms-1660620-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac93/8494427/022c4f95546e/nihms-1660620-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac93/8494427/e9047cc0910f/nihms-1660620-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac93/8494427/022c4f95546e/nihms-1660620-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac93/8494427/e9047cc0910f/nihms-1660620-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Equity at the ballot box: Health as a resource for political participation among low-income workers in two United States cities.投票箱前的公平：健康作为美国两个城市低收入工人政治参与的一种资源
Front Polit Sci. 2021 Jan;2. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2020.601323. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
2
Why do some countries do better or worse in life expectancy relative to income? An analysis of Brazil, Ethiopia, and the United States of America.为什么一些国家在预期寿命方面相对于收入表现得更好或更差？对巴西、埃塞俄比亚和美利坚合众国的分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Nov 10;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01315-z.
3
[Estimating the frequency of induced abortion: a comparison of two methods].[估算人工流产率：两种方法的比较]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2004 May;15(5):331-6. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892004000500008.
4
Benefits of the ballot box for species conservation.投票箱对物种保护的益处。
Ecol Lett. 2014 Mar;17(3):294-302. doi: 10.1111/ele.12230. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
5
[A good investment: promoting health in cities and neighbourhoods].一项明智投资：促进城市及社区健康
Gac Sanit. 2016 Nov;30 Suppl 1:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.04.015.
6
The voting experience and beliefs about ballot secrecy.投票体验和对选票保密性的看法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0209765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209765. eCollection 2019.
7
Identifying Challenges, Enabling Practices, and Reviewing Existing Policies Regarding Digital Equity and Digital Divide Toward Smart and Healthy Cities: Protocol for an Integrative Review.识别关于智能健康城市的数字公平与数字鸿沟的挑战、可行做法并审查现有政策：一项综合综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Dec 8;11(12):e40068. doi: 10.2196/40068.
8
Health Systems Governance for health equity: critical reflections.促进健康公平的卫生系统治理：批判性思考
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2010;12 Suppl 1:62-76. doi: 10.1590/s0124-00642010000700005.
9
Social justice and the demographic transition: lessons from India's Kerala State.社会正义与人口转变：来自印度喀拉拉邦的经验教训。
Int J Health Serv. 1978;8(1):123-44. doi: 10.2190/TKUW-J59L-YHMF-3W5Q.
10
Developing and Implementing Racial Health Equity Plans in Four Large US Cities: A Qualitative Study.在美国四个大城市制定和实施种族健康公平计划：一项定性研究。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(6):780-790. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001756. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Smoking status and voting behaviour and intentions in countries of the former Soviet Union.前苏联国家的吸烟状况、投票行为及意向。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14308. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95632-4.
2
Health Equity and the Dynamism of Structural Racism and Public Policy.健康公平与结构性种族主义和公共政策的动态关系。
Milbank Q. 2022 Sep;100(3):628-649. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12581. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
The relationship between health and political ideology begins in childhood.健康与政治意识形态之间的关系始于童年时期。

本文引用的文献

1
Recruitment of Low-wage Workers for a Time-Sensitive Natural Experiment to Evaluate a Minimum Wage Policy: Challenges and Lessons Learned.为一项评估最低工资政策的时间敏感型自然实验招募低薪工人：挑战与经验教训
Field methods. 2021 Aug;33(3):268-286. doi: 10.1177/1525822X20985966. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Voting, health and interventions in healthcare settings: a scoping review.投票、健康与医疗环境中的干预措施：一项范围综述
Public Health Rev. 2020 Jul 1;41:16. doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-00133-6. eCollection 2020.
3
Health and voting over the course of adulthood: Evidence from two British birth cohorts.
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Aug 24;19:101214. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101214. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Chronic health conditions and voter turnout: Results from the 2012 United States presidential election.慢性健康状况与选民投票率：2012年美国总统大选的结果
World Med Health Policy. 2021 Jun;13(2):313-327. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.454. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
Behavioral economic methods to inform infectious disease response: Prevention, testing, and vaccination in the COVID-19 pandemic.行为经济学方法在传染病应对中的应用：COVID-19 大流行中的预防、检测和疫苗接种。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0258828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258828. eCollection 2022.
成年期的健康与投票情况：来自两个英国出生队列的证据。
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Dec 16;10:100531. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100531. eCollection 2020 Apr.
4
The Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Political Effects of Housing in Comparative Perspective.比较视角下住房的社会经济、人口和政治影响
Annu Rev Sociol. 2016 Jul;42:347-367. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074333. Epub 2016 May 23.
5
Incorporating Health into Studies of Political Behavior: Evidence for Turnout and Partisanship.将健康纳入政治行为研究：投票率和党派关系的证据
Polit Res Q. 2015 Mar;68(1):104-116. doi: 10.1177/1065912914563548. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
6
How Different Forms of Health Matter to Political Participation.不同形式的健康如何影响政治参与。
J Polit. 2017;79(1):166-178. doi: 10.1086/687536. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
7
Decreasing Smoking but Increasing Stigma? Anti-tobacco Campaigns, Public Health, and Cancer Care.吸烟率下降但污名化加剧？反烟草运动、公共卫生与癌症护理。
AMA J Ethics. 2017 May 1;19(5):475-485. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.5.msoc1-1705.
8
The differentiated effects of health on political participation.健康对政治参与的差异化影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;27(4):599-604. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw245.
9
How voter turnout varies between different chronic conditions? A population-based register study.不同慢性病患者的选民投票率如何变化？一项基于人群登记的研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 May;71(5):475-479. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208314. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
10
What you do every day matters: A new direction for health promotion.你每天所做的事至关重要：健康促进的新方向。
Can J Public Health. 2016 Aug 15;107(2):e205-e208. doi: 10.17269/cjph.107.5317.