Suppr超能文献

毒死蜱、异丙隆或戊唑醇对土壤细菌群落多样性和组成的生态毒理学影响的实验室到田间评估

Lab to Field Assessment of the Ecotoxicological Impact of Chlorpyrifos, Isoproturon, or Tebuconazole on the Diversity and Composition of the Soil Bacterial Community.

作者信息

Storck Veronika, Nikolaki Sofia, Perruchon Chiara, Chabanis Camille, Sacchi Angela, Pertile Giorgia, Baguelin Céline, Karas Panagiotis A, Spor Aymé, Devers-Lamrani Marion, Papadopoulou Evangelia S, Sibourg Olivier, Malandain Cedric, Trevisan Marco, Ferrari Federico, Karpouzas Dimitrios G, Tsiamis George, Martin-Laurent Fabrice

机构信息

AgroSup Dijon, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Agroécologie, Dijon, France.

Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Management, University of Patras, Agrinio, Greece.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 29;9:1412. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01412. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Pesticides are intentionally applied to agricultural fields for crop protection. They can harm non-target organisms such as soil microorganisms involved in important ecosystem functions with impacts at the global scale. Within the frame of the pesticide registration process, the ecotoxicological impact of pesticides on soil microorganisms is still based on carbon and nitrogen mineralization tests, despite the availability of more extensive approaches analyzing the abundance, activity or diversity of soil microorganisms. In this study, we used a high-density DNA microarray (PhyloChip) and 16S rDNA amplicon next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze the impact of the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos (CHL), the phenyl-urea herbicide isoproturon (IPU), or the triazole fungicide tebuconazole (TCZ) on the diversity and composition of the soil bacterial community. To our knowledge, it is the first time that the combination of these approaches are applied to assess the impact of these three pesticides in a lab-to-field experimental design. The PhyloChip analysis revealed that although no significant changes in the composition of the bacterial community were observed in soil microcosms exposed to the pesticides, significant differences in detected operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were observed in the field experiment between pesticide treatments and control for all three tested pesticides after 70 days of exposure. NGS revealed that the bacterial diversity and composition varied over time. This trend was more marked in the microcosm than in the field study. Only slight but significant transient effects of CHL or TCZ were observed in the microcosm and the field study, respectively. IPU was not found to significantly modify the soil bacterial diversity or composition. Our results are in accordance with conclusions of the Environmental Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which concluded that these three pesticides may have a low risk toward soil microorganisms.

摘要

农药被有意施用于农田以保护作物。它们会伤害非目标生物,如参与重要生态系统功能的土壤微生物,其影响具有全球规模。在农药登记过程框架内,尽管有更广泛的方法可用于分析土壤微生物的丰度、活性或多样性,但农药对土壤微生物的生态毒理学影响仍基于碳和氮矿化试验。在本研究中,我们使用高密度DNA微阵列(PhyloChip)和16S rDNA扩增子下一代测序(NGS)来分析有机磷杀虫剂毒死蜱(CHL)、苯基脲除草剂异丙隆(IPU)或三唑类杀菌剂戊唑醇(TCZ)对土壤细菌群落多样性和组成的影响。据我们所知,这是首次将这些方法结合应用于实验室到田间的实验设计中,以评估这三种农药的影响。PhyloChip分析表明,尽管在接触农药的土壤微观世界中未观察到细菌群落组成的显著变化,但在田间试验中,暴露70天后,所有三种测试农药的处理组与对照组之间在检测到的操作分类单元(OTU)上存在显著差异。NGS显示细菌多样性和组成随时间变化。这种趋势在微观世界中比在田间研究中更为明显。在微观世界和田间研究中,分别仅观察到CHL或TCZ轻微但显著的短暂影响。未发现IPU能显著改变土壤细菌多样性或组成。我们的结果与欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)的结论一致,该机构得出结论,这三种农药对土壤微生物的风险可能较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972d/6034002/1423b84f17b2/fmicb-09-01412-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验