• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如果没有帮助,就不会造成伤害?当能力归因不准确时,信息阐述会损害性别多样化团队的表现。

If it doesn't help, it doesn't hurt? Information elaboration harms the performance of gender-diverse teams when attributions of competence are inaccurate.

机构信息

Department of Organization Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Department of Organizational- and Economic Psychology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0201180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201180. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0201180
PMID:30024972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6053226/
Abstract

Information elaboration-the act of exchanging, discussing, and integrating information and perspectives through verbal communication-tends to be considered as the silver bullet that drives the performance of diverse teams. We challenge this notion by proposing that the effect of information elaboration on team performance depends on the accuracy of within-group competence attributions, i.e. the extent to which attributions of task competence among team members correspond with members' actual task competence. We argue that information elaboration may actually harm performance when within-group competence attributions are inaccurate, given that in such teams decisions are likely to be based on suggestions from members who have much influence but little competence. We conducted an experiment with 97 gender-heterogeneous teams working on gender-typical problems and coded their interactions. Our findings support our hypotheses that members who are perceived as more competent are more influential in the information elaboration process, and that information elaboration harms performance when competence attributions are not accurate. In contrast to our expectations, pro-diversity beliefs did not mitigate this negative effect of inaccurate competence attributions. We argue that this speaks to the robustness of our findings regarding the detrimental effects of information elaboration when competence attributions are inaccurate.

摘要

信息细化——通过口头交流交换、讨论和整合信息和观点的行为——往往被认为是推动不同团队绩效的银弹。我们通过提出以下观点挑战了这一观点,即信息细化对团队绩效的影响取决于组内能力归因的准确性,即团队成员之间对任务能力的归因与成员的实际任务能力相符的程度。我们认为,当组内能力归因不准确时,信息细化实际上可能会损害绩效,因为在这样的团队中,决策可能基于具有很大影响力但能力有限的成员的建议。我们进行了一项涉及 97 个性别异质团队的实验,这些团队致力于解决性别典型问题并对其互动进行了编码。我们的研究结果支持了我们的假设,即被认为更有能力的成员在信息细化过程中更具影响力,并且当能力归因不准确时,信息细化会损害绩效。与我们的预期相反,支持多样性的信念并没有减轻不准确能力归因的负面影响。我们认为,这说明了我们关于能力归因不准确时信息细化的不利影响的研究结果的稳健性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bc/6053226/306144182f0d/pone.0201180.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bc/6053226/306144182f0d/pone.0201180.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bc/6053226/306144182f0d/pone.0201180.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
If it doesn't help, it doesn't hurt? Information elaboration harms the performance of gender-diverse teams when attributions of competence are inaccurate.如果没有帮助,就不会造成伤害?当能力归因不准确时,信息阐述会损害性别多样化团队的表现。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0201180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201180. eCollection 2018.
2
(Mitigating) the self-fulfillment of gender stereotypes in teams: The interplay of competence attributions, behavioral dominance, individual performance, and diversity beliefs.(减轻)团队中性别刻板印象的自我实现:能力归因、行为主导、个体绩效和多样性信念的相互作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Nov;107(11):1907-1925. doi: 10.1037/apl0000995. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.差异为何有差异?组织中多元化团队的承诺与现实。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2005 Oct;6(2):31-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x. Epub 2005 Oct 1.
4
Social competence and conduct problems in young children: issues in assessment.幼儿的社会能力与行为问题:评估中的问题
J Clin Child Psychol. 1999 Mar;28(1):25-43. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2801_3.
5
"Why am I out of the loop?" attributions influence responses to information exclusion.“为什么我被排除在外了?”归因会影响对信息排除的反应。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;36(9):1186-201. doi: 10.1177/0146167210380406. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
6
Children's trait and emotion attributions in socially ambiguous and unambiguous situations.儿童在社会模糊和明确情境中的特质与情绪归因。
J Genet Psychol. 2013 Jul-Aug;174(4):366-86. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2012.685991.
7
The Role of Social Cue Utilization and Closing-the-Loop Communication in the Performance of Ad Hoc Dyads.社交线索利用与闭环沟通在临时二元组表现中的作用
Hum Factors. 2017 Sep;59(6):1009-1021. doi: 10.1177/0018720817699512. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
8
Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential.促进团队创造力:换位思考是挖掘多样性潜力的关键。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Sep;97(5):982-96. doi: 10.1037/a0029159. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
9
The positive role of authentic leadership in organizations negatively affected by cognitive diversity.真诚领导在受到认知多样性负面影响的组织中的积极作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 25;15:1276585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1276585. eCollection 2024.
10
Innovation in globally distributed teams: the role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions.全球分布式团队中的创新:LMX、沟通频率以及成员影响力对团队决策的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Nov;97(6):1252-61. doi: 10.1037/a0028958. Epub 2012 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Hidden figures: epistemic costs and benefits of detecting (invisible) diversity in science.隐藏的数字:科学中发现(无形)多样性的认知成本与收益
Eur J Philos Sci. 2021;11(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s13194-021-00349-6. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
2
The Flywheel Effect of Gender Role Expectations in Diverse Work Groups.不同工作群体中性别角色期望的飞轮效应。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 7;10:976. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00976. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential.促进团队创造力:换位思考是挖掘多样性潜力的关键。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Sep;97(5):982-96. doi: 10.1037/a0029159. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
2
Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership.管理多样性与提升团队成果:变革型领导的前景
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):77-89. doi: 10.1037/a0013077.
3
Social identity contingencies: how diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions.
社会身份偶然性:多样性线索如何向非裔美国人在主流机构中发出威胁或安全信号。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Apr;94(4):615-30. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615.
4
Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups.通过重视多样性来弥合断层线:多样性信念、信息阐述与多元化工作团队中的绩效
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1189-99. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1189.
5
Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis.深层成分变量作为团队绩效的预测指标:一项元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):595-615. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595.
6
Work group diversity.工作团队多样性。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:515-41. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546.
7
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.群体间接触理论的元分析检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May;90(5):751-83. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
8
Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.工作团队多样性与团队绩效:一个整合模型及研究议程。
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Dec;89(6):1008-22. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008.
9
Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance.对反刻板印象行为的反应:反弹在文化刻板印象维持中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;87(2):157-76. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157.
10
Does emotional intelligence meet traditional standards for an intelligence? Some new data and conclusions.情商符合智力的传统标准吗?一些新数据与结论。
Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):196-231.