Çakırbay Tanış Merve, Akay Canan, Sevim Handan
1 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
2 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Int J Artif Organs. 2018 Oct;41(10):677-683. doi: 10.1177/0391398818786884. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of various denture base materials following four different aging periods.
In total, 48 disc-shaped specimens per each group were prepared: Group I: acrylic resin polymerized in cool water and heated up to 100°C over 45 min and boiled for 15 min; Group II: acrylic resin polymerized under pressure in 40°C-45°C water bath for 10 min; Group III: autopolymerized hard relining resin Cold Liner Rebase; Group IV: autopolymerized hard relining resin Truliner; Group V: soft relining resin DentuSil. Then the specimens were stored in water for 24 h or 15 days, or thermocycled 2500 times or 10,000 times. Cytotoxicity was evaluated with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay using L929 cells after 72-h cell incubation. Cell viability percentages were counted and statistical analyses were performed. The results were also evaluated according to ISO standard 10993-5.
All materials showed similar cell viability percentages following 24-h water storage and 2500 and 10,000 thermal cycles. Following 15-day water storage, a statistically significant difference was observed between the materials. Comparisons of the aging periods for each material showed statistically significant differences. Groups III and IV showed moderately cytotoxic effect following 15-day water storage. The remaining groups showed slightly cytotoxic or non-cytotoxic effect.
Polymerizing acrylic resins under pressure can be an alternative to conventional polymerizing to ensure a faster denture repair while providing similar cell viability values. Heat-cured acrylic resins provide higher cell viability than hard chairside lining materials in a 15-day period.
本研究的目的是评估不同义齿基托材料在四个不同老化期后的细胞毒性作用。
每组共制备48个圆盘形标本:第一组:在冷水中聚合的丙烯酸树脂,在45分钟内加热至100°C并煮沸15分钟;第二组:在40°C - 45°C水浴中加压聚合10分钟的丙烯酸树脂;第三组:自凝硬质重衬树脂Cold Liner Rebase;第四组:自凝硬质重衬树脂Truliner;第五组:软质重衬树脂DentuSil。然后将标本在水中储存24小时或15天,或进行2500次或10000次热循环。在细胞培养72小时后,使用L929细胞通过3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐(MTT)法评估细胞毒性。计算细胞活力百分比并进行统计分析。结果也根据ISO标准10993-5进行评估。
在储存24小时水以及进行2500次和10000次热循环后,所有材料显示出相似的细胞活力百分比。在储存15天的水中后,材料之间观察到统计学上的显著差异。每种材料老化期的比较显示出统计学上的显著差异。在储存15天的水中后,第三组和第四组显示出中度细胞毒性作用。其余组显示出轻微细胞毒性或无细胞毒性作用。
在压力下聚合丙烯酸树脂可以作为传统聚合的替代方法,以确保更快的义齿修复,同时提供相似的细胞活力值。在15天的时间内,热固化丙烯酸树脂比硬质椅旁衬里材料提供更高的细胞活力。