• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赞比亚宫颈癌预防的患者偏好与支付意愿:多队列离散选择实验方案

Patient Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Zambia: Protocol for a Multi-Cohort Discrete Choice Experiment.

作者信息

Subramanian Sujha, Kaganova Yevgeniya, Zhang Yuying, Hoover Sonja, Nyambe Namakau, Pinder Leeya, Chibwesha Carla, Kapambwe Sharon, Parham Groesbeck

机构信息

RTI International, Waltham, MA, United States.

University of North Carolina, Lusaka, Zambia.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jul 25;7(7):e10429. doi: 10.2196/10429.

DOI:10.2196/10429
PMID:30045833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6083044/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although most countries in southern Africa have cervical cancer screening programs, these programs generally fail to reach a significant majority of women because they are often implemented as pilot or research projects, and this limits their scope and ability to scale up screening. Some countries have planned larger-scale programs, but these have either never been implemented or have not been successfully scaled up. Most of the global burden of cervical cancer is experienced in countries with limited resources, and mortality from cervical cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths among women in Sub-Saharan Africa.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to learn about preferences for cervical cancer screening in Zambia, to identify barriers and facilitators for screening uptake, and to evaluate willingness to pay for screening services to support the scaling up of cervical cancer screening programs.

METHODS

We will conduct a discrete choice experiment by interviewing women and men and asking them to choose among constructed scenarios with varying combinations of attributes relevant to cervical cancer screening. To inform the discrete choice experiment, we will conduct focus groups and interviews about general knowledge and attitudes about cervical screening, perception about the availability of screening, stigma associated with cancer and HIV, and payment for health care services. For the discrete choice experiment, we will have a maximum design of 120 choice sets divided into 15 sets of 8 tasks each with a sample size of 320-400 respondents. We will use a hierarchical Bayesian estimation procedure to assess attributes at the following two levels: group and individual levels.

RESULTS

The model will generate preferences for attributes to assess the most important features and allow for the assessment of differences among cohorts. We will conduct policy simulations reflecting potential changes in the attributes of the screening facilities and calculate the projected changes in preference for choosing to undergo cervical cancer screening. The findings from the discrete choice experiment will be supplemented with interviews, focus groups, and patient surveys to ensure a comprehensive and context-based interpretation of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Because willingness to pay for cervical cancer screening has not been previously assessed, this will be a unique and important contribution to the literature. This study will take into account the high HIV prevalence in Sub-Saharan Africa and prevailing gender attitudes to identify an optimal package of interventions to reduce cervical cancer incidence. This simulation of women's decisions (and men's support) to undergo screening will lay the foundation for understanding the stated preferences and willingness to pay to help design future screening programs.

REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER

RR1-10.2196/10429.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c25b/6083044/33beb7f19e4b/resprot_v7i7e10429_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c25b/6083044/79f32ab403d1/resprot_v7i7e10429_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c25b/6083044/33beb7f19e4b/resprot_v7i7e10429_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c25b/6083044/79f32ab403d1/resprot_v7i7e10429_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c25b/6083044/33beb7f19e4b/resprot_v7i7e10429_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

尽管非洲南部的大多数国家都有宫颈癌筛查项目,但这些项目通常未能覆盖绝大多数女性,因为它们往往作为试点或研究项目实施,这限制了其规模和扩大筛查的能力。一些国家计划开展更大规模的项目,但这些项目要么从未实施,要么没有成功扩大规模。宫颈癌的全球负担主要集中在资源有限的国家,在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,宫颈癌死亡率是女性癌症相关死亡的最常见原因。

目的

本研究旨在了解赞比亚女性对宫颈癌筛查的偏好,确定筛查接受率的障碍和促进因素,并评估为筛查服务付费以支持扩大宫颈癌筛查项目的意愿。

方法

我们将通过访谈女性和男性进行离散选择实验,要求他们在具有不同宫颈癌筛查相关属性组合的构建场景中进行选择。为了为离散选择实验提供信息,我们将开展焦点小组讨论,并就宫颈癌筛查的一般知识和态度、对筛查可及性的认知、与癌症和艾滋病毒相关的耻辱感以及医疗保健服务付费情况进行访谈。对于离散选择实验,我们将采用最大设计,即120个选择集,分为15组,每组8个任务,样本量为320 - 400名受访者。我们将使用分层贝叶斯估计程序在以下两个层面评估属性:群体层面和个体层面。

结果

该模型将生成对属性的偏好,以评估最重要的特征,并允许评估不同队列之间的差异。我们将进行政策模拟,反映筛查设施属性的潜在变化,并计算选择接受宫颈癌筛查的偏好预计变化。离散选择实验的结果将辅以访谈、焦点小组讨论和患者调查,以确保对结果进行全面且基于背景的解读。

结论

由于此前尚未评估为宫颈癌筛查付费的意愿,这将是对文献的一项独特且重要的贡献。本研究将考虑撒哈拉以南非洲地区高艾滋病毒流行率以及普遍的性别态度,以确定一套最佳干预措施,降低宫颈癌发病率。这种对女性(以及男性支持)接受筛查决策的模拟将为理解既定偏好和付费意愿奠定基础,以帮助设计未来的筛查项目。

注册报告标识符

RR1 - 10.2196/10429

相似文献

1
Patient Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Zambia: Protocol for a Multi-Cohort Discrete Choice Experiment.赞比亚宫颈癌预防的患者偏好与支付意愿:多队列离散选择实验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jul 25;7(7):e10429. doi: 10.2196/10429.
2
Societal preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.澳大利亚生育治疗的社会偏好:基于选择的离散选择实验。
J Med Econ. 2019 Jan;22(1):95-107. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1549055. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
3
Women's preferences, willingness-to-pay, and predicted uptake for single-nucleotide polymorphism gene testing to guide personalized breast cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment.女性对单核苷酸多态性基因检测以指导个性化乳腺癌筛查策略的偏好、支付意愿及预测接受度:一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 18;12:1837-1852. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S171348. eCollection 2018.
4
Developing a discrete choice experiment in Malawi: eliciting preferences for breast cancer early detection services.在马拉维开展离散选择实验:获取对乳腺癌早期检测服务的偏好
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Oct 14;9:1459-72. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S87341. eCollection 2015.
5
Women's preferences for cervical cancer screening: a study using a discrete choice experiment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Summer;22(3):344-50. doi: 10.1017/s0266462306051245.
6
Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?探究女性对乳腺癌筛查偏好的异质性:风险沟通是否重要?
Value Health. 2018 Feb;21(2):219-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
7
Call (and pay) the midwife: A discrete choice experiment on mothers' preferences and their willingness to pay for midwifery care.叫(并付费)产婆:一项关于母亲偏好及其对产婆护理支付意愿的离散选择实验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Dec;124:104096. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104096. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
8
Public Preference Heterogeneity and Predicted Uptake Rate of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening Programs in Rural China: Discrete Choice Experiments and Latent Class Analysis.公众偏好异质性与中国农村上消化道癌筛查项目的预期参与率:离散选择实验和潜在类别分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jul 10;9:e42898. doi: 10.2196/42898.
9
Registered nurses' preferences for rural and urban jobs: A discrete choice experiment.注册护士对农村和城市工作的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Oct;86:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 26.
10
Preferences for transitional HIV care among people living with HIV recently released from prison in Zambia: a discrete choice experiment.赞比亚刚出狱 HIV 感染者对过渡性 HIV 护理的偏好:离散选择实验。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Oct;24(10):e25805. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25805.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrated Model of Cancer Control for Early Detection and Treatment in Adolescents and Young Adults Living With HIV: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.针对感染艾滋病毒的青少年和青年进行癌症早期检测与治疗的综合癌症控制模式:一项整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 29;14:e68254. doi: 10.2196/68254.

本文引用的文献

1
A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in Australia.一项离散选择实验方案:了解澳大利亚大城市和农村地区癌症患者对其癌症护理的偏好。
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 24;4(10):e006661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006661.
2
Prospective seroepidemiologic study on the role of Human Papillomavirus and other infections in cervical carcinogenesis: evidence from the EPIC cohort.前瞻性血清流行病学研究人乳头瘤病毒和其他感染在宫颈癌发病机制中的作用:来自 EPIC 队列的证据。
Int J Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;135(2):440-52. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28665. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
3
Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.
构建离散选择实验的实验设计:ISPOR 联合分析实验设计良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.
4
Willingness and acceptability of cervical cancer screening among HIV positive Nigerian women.尼日利亚 HIV 阳性妇女对宫颈癌筛查的意愿和可接受性。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 17;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-46.
5
'See-and-treat' works for cervical cancer prevention: what about controlling the high burden in India?“即查即治”对宫颈癌预防有效:那如何控制印度的高负担情况呢?
Indian J Med Res. 2012 May;135(5):576-9.
6
Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review and synthetic analysis.2008 年归因于感染的癌症全球负担:综述和综合分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):607-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70137-7. Epub 2012 May 9.
7
Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Mulanje, Malawi: a qualitative study.马拉维穆兰杰地区宫颈癌筛查的障碍:一项定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011 Mar 14;5:125-31. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S17317.
8
HIV/AIDS-related stigma and discrimination in Nigeria: review of research studies and future directions for prevention strategies.尼日利亚与艾滋病毒/艾滋病相关的耻辱感和歧视:研究综述及预防策略的未来方向
Afr J Reprod Health. 2009 Sep;13(3):21-35.
9
Rural practice preferences among medical students in Ghana: a discrete choice experiment.加纳医学生的农村行医偏好:离散选择实验。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 May;88(5):333-41. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.072892.
10
Women's preferences for place of delivery in rural Tanzania: a population-based discrete choice experiment.坦桑尼亚农村地区妇女对分娩地点的偏好:一项基于人群的离散选择实验
Am J Public Health. 2009 Sep;99(9):1666-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.146209. Epub 2009 Jul 16.