Department of Human Development.
Department of Psychology.
Dev Psychol. 2018 Sep;54(9):1773-1784. doi: 10.1037/dev0000554. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
We report the 1st example of a true complementarity effect in memory development-a situation in which memory for the simultaneously becomes more and less accurate between early childhood and adulthood. We investigated this paradoxical effect because fuzzy-trace theory predicts that it can occur in paradigms that produce developmental reversals in false memory, which are circumstances in which adults are more likely than children to remember new events as old. The complementarity prediction is this: If subjects separately judge whether those same events are new but similar to old ones, adults will be more accurate than children, even though adults are less accurate when they judge whether the items are old. We report 4 experiments in which children (6- and 10-year-olds), adolescents (14-year-olds), and adults encoded the modal developmental reversal materials: Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists. Then, they responded to memory tests on which half the subjects judged whether test items were old and half judged whether the same items were new-similar. The paradoxical complementarity effect was detected in all experiments: The tendency to falsely remember items as being old increased with development, but so did the tendency to correctly remember them as being new-similar. (PsycINFO Database Record
我们报告了记忆发展中首个真正的互补效应的实例——在这种情况下,儿童期和成年期之间同时对记忆的准确性会增加和降低。我们研究了这种矛盾的效应,因为模糊痕迹理论预测,它可能会出现在产生虚假记忆发展逆转的范式中,在这种情况下,成年人比儿童更有可能将新事件记为旧事件。互补性预测是这样的:如果受试者分别判断相同的事件是否是新的但与旧的相似,那么成年人会比儿童更准确,即使当他们判断项目是否是旧的时,成年人更不准确。我们报告了 4 项实验,其中包括儿童(6 岁和 10 岁)、青少年(14 岁)和成年人,他们对模式发展逆转材料进行了编码:Deese-Roediger-McDermott 列表。然后,他们对记忆测试做出反应,其中一半的受试者判断测试项目是否为旧,另一半判断相同的项目是否为新相似。在所有实验中都检测到了这种矛盾的互补效应:错误地将项目记为旧的趋势随着发展而增加,但正确地将其记为新相似的趋势也增加了。(PsycINFO 数据库记录)