• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展性虚假记忆的反转:现在你看到了,现在你又看不到了!

Developmental reversals in false memory: now you see them, now you don't!

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2011 Mar;47(2):442-9. doi: 10.1037/a0021058.

DOI:10.1037/a0021058
PMID:21142371
Abstract

A developmental reversal in false memory is the counterintuitive phenomenon of higher levels of false memory in older children, adolescents, and adults than in younger children. The ability of verbatim memory to suppress this age trend in false memory was evaluated using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. Seven and 11-year-old children studied DRM lists either in a standard condition (whole words) that normally produces high levels of false memory or in an alternative condition that should enhance verbatim memory (word fragments). Half the children took 1 recognition test, and the other half took 3 recognition tests. In the single-test condition, the typical age difference in false memory was found for the word condition (higher false memory for 11-year-olds than for 7-year-olds), but in the word fragment condition false memory was lower in the older children. In the word condition, false memory increased over successive recognition tests. Our findings are consistent with 2 principles of fuzzy-trace theory's explanation of false memories: (a) reliance on verbatim rather than gist memory causes such errors to decline with age, and (b) repeated testing increases reliance on gist memory in older children and adults who spontaneously connect meaning across events.

摘要

发展性错误记忆的逆转是一种反直觉的现象,即年龄较大的儿童、青少年和成年人比年龄较小的儿童产生更高水平的错误记忆。使用 Deese-Roediger-McDermott(DRM)范式评估逐字记忆抑制这种错误记忆年龄趋势的能力。7 岁和 11 岁的儿童在标准条件(完整单词)下学习 DRM 列表,该条件通常会产生高水平的错误记忆,或者在替代条件下学习,该条件应增强逐字记忆(单词碎片)。一半的孩子接受了 1 次识别测试,另一半孩子接受了 3 次识别测试。在单次测试条件下,发现了单词条件下错误记忆的典型年龄差异(11 岁儿童的错误记忆高于 7 岁儿童),但在单词碎片条件下,年龄较大的儿童的错误记忆较低。在单词条件下,错误记忆随着连续的识别测试而增加。我们的发现与模糊痕迹理论对错误记忆的解释的 2 个原则一致:(a)依赖逐字记忆而不是要点记忆会导致此类错误随年龄的增长而减少,以及(b)重复测试会增加年龄较大的儿童和成年人对要点记忆的依赖,他们会自发地将意义连接到事件中。

相似文献

1
Developmental reversals in false memory: now you see them, now you don't!发展性虚假记忆的反转:现在你看到了,现在你又看不到了!
Dev Psychol. 2011 Mar;47(2):442-9. doi: 10.1037/a0021058.
2
Attention to global gist processing eliminates age effects in false memories.关注整体主旨加工可消除虚假记忆中的年龄效应。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Feb;99(2):96-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.08.007. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
3
False memories in children and adults: age, distinctiveness, and subjective experience.儿童和成人的错误记忆:年龄、独特性和主观体验。
Dev Psychol. 2002 Sep;38(5):705-18.
4
Using story contexts to bias children's true and false memories.利用故事语境影响儿童的真实和虚假记忆。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Jan;108(1):77-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
5
Children (but not adults) can inhibit false memories.儿童(而非成年人)能够抑制错误记忆。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Dec;16(12):927-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01638.x.
6
Do children "DRM" like adults? False memory production in children.儿童会像成年人一样产生“错误记忆效应”吗?儿童错误记忆的产生。
Dev Psychol. 2008 Jan;44(1):169-81. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.169.
7
Global gist extraction in children and adults.儿童和成人的全局主旨提取。
Memory. 2006 Nov;14(8):952-64. doi: 10.1080/09658210601008957.
8
Story contexts increase susceptibility to the DRM illusion in 5-year-olds.故事背景会增加5岁儿童对DRM错觉的易感性。
Dev Sci. 2007 May;10(3):374-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00592.x.
9
When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.当真实记忆可用性引发错误记忆:来自虚构症患者的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(10):1866-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.008. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
10
Developmental reversals in false memory: a review of data and theory.错误记忆中的发展性逆转:数据与理论综述
Psychol Bull. 2008 May;134(3):343-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.343.

引用本文的文献

1
Older adults produce more verbal false memories than younger adults: is it semantics or executive functioning?老年人比年轻人产生更多的言语错误记忆:是语义还是执行功能的原因?
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Mar 17;37(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02914-4.
2
Normative developmental vs. reverse developmental trends in memory distortion: a framework to investigate the impact of internal and external influences on memory and their relevance to legal decisions.记忆扭曲中的规范性发展与逆向发展趋势:一个用于研究内部和外部影响对记忆的作用及其与法律决策相关性的框架。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1232753. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232753. eCollection 2023.
3
Short-Term Phantom Recollection in 8-10-Year-Olds and Young Adults.
8至10岁儿童和年轻人的短期幻象回忆
J Intell. 2023 Mar 30;11(4):67. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040067.
4
The Sweet Spot: When Children's Developing Abilities, Brains, and Knowledge Make Them Better Learners Than Adults.《甜蜜点:儿童的发展能力、大脑和知识如何使他们成为比成人更好的学习者》。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Sep;17(5):1322-1338. doi: 10.1177/17456916211045971. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
The influence of semantic context on false memories.语义语境对错误记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Nov;49(8):1555-1567. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01182-1. Epub 2021 May 6.
6
Developmental reversals in false memory: Development is complementary, not compensatory.错误记忆的发展逆转:发展是互补的,而不是补偿的。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Sep;54(9):1773-1784. doi: 10.1037/dev0000554. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
How Fuzzy-Trace Theory Predicts True and False Memories for Words, Sentences, and Narratives.模糊痕迹理论如何预测对单词、句子和叙事的真实与虚假记忆。
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2016 Mar 1;5(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.12.003.
8
The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions.中性和负面记忆错觉中发展趋势的可塑性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jan;145(1):31-55. doi: 10.1037/xge0000127.
9
Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Lifespan Cognitive Development.模糊痕迹理论与毕生认知发展
Dev Rev. 2015 Dec 1;38:89-121. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.006.
10
Reliability of Children's Testimony in the Era of Developmental Reversals.发展逆转时代儿童证词的可靠性
Dev Rev. 2012 Sep;32(3):224-267. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.008.