• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)分析中得出的患有系统性高血压的患者的性别差异。

Sex Differences of Patients With Systemic Hypertension (From the Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial [SPRINT]).

机构信息

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

Universidad de Ciencias Médicas, San José, Costa Rica.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 15;122(6):985-993. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.046. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.046
PMID:30072129
Abstract

There are differences in the incidence, pathophysiology, and long-term effects of hypertension between women and men. We assessed sex-specific benefit-risk tradeoffs of different blood pressure (BP) goals in patients enrolled in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) after propensity score matching those with standard therapy (systolic BP <140 mm Hg) to those with intensive therapy (systolic BP <120 mm Hg; n = 9,106). Cox regression was conducted to compare standard versus intensive therapy in women and men with the composite outcome of myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Women were generally healthier at baseline and had a lower cardiovascular risk. Men on intensive therapy had a lower risk of the composite outcome compared to those on standard therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.86, p = 0.001) while in women no differences between therapy groups were observed (HR 0.82 [0.60 to 1.12], p = 0.206). For safety outcomes, women and men had increased risk of related serious adverse events with intensive treatment (HR 1.52 [1.06 to 2.18], p = 0.023 and HR 2.07 [1.55 to2.77], p < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, our study demonstrated that women did not benefit from intensive compared to standard BP control. A potential explanation for this may be the lower baseline cardiovascular risk in women.

摘要

女性和男性的高血压发病率、病理生理学和长期影响存在差异。我们评估了收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中不同血压(BP)目标的性别特异性获益-风险权衡,这些患者通过倾向评分匹配接受标准治疗(收缩压<140mmHg)和强化治疗(收缩压<120mmHg),并对那些接受强化治疗的患者(n=9106)进行了分析。Cox 回归用于比较女性和男性的标准治疗与强化治疗的复合结局,复合结局包括心肌梗死、其他急性冠状动脉综合征、卒中等。女性的基线健康状况通常更好,心血管风险较低。与标准治疗相比,强化治疗组的复合结局风险较低(风险比 [HR] 0.70,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.57 至 0.86,p=0.001),而女性组两种治疗方案之间没有差异(HR 0.82 [0.60 至 1.12],p=0.206)。对于安全性结局,女性和男性的强化治疗相关严重不良事件风险增加(HR 1.52 [1.06 至 2.18],p=0.023 和 HR 2.07 [1.55 至 2.77],p<0.001)。总之,我们的研究表明,与标准 BP 控制相比,女性并未从强化治疗中获益。造成这种结果的一个潜在原因可能是女性的基线心血管风险较低。

相似文献

1
Sex Differences of Patients With Systemic Hypertension (From the Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial [SPRINT]).从收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)分析中得出的患有系统性高血压的患者的性别差异。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 15;122(6):985-993. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.046. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
2
Assessment of Risk of Harm Associated With Intensive Blood Pressure Management Among Patients With Hypertension Who Smoke: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.高血压患者强化血压管理相关伤害风险评估:收缩压干预试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190005. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0005.
3
Effect of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular outcomes based on cardiovascular risk: A secondary analysis of the SPRINT trial.强化降压对基于心血管风险的心血管结局的影响:SPRINT 试验的二次分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Feb;26(3):238-245. doi: 10.1177/2047487318800741. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
4
Potential Deaths Averted and Serious Adverse Events Incurred From Adoption of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Intensive Blood Pressure Regimen in the United States: Projections From NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey).在美国采用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)强化血压治疗方案避免的潜在死亡和发生的严重不良事件:来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的预测
Circulation. 2017 Apr 25;135(17):1617-1628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025322. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
5
Individualising intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in hypertension using computational trial phenomaps and machine learning: a post-hoc analysis of randomised clinical trials.使用计算试验表型图谱和机器学习对高血压患者进行个体化强化收缩压降低治疗:随机临床试验的事后分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Nov;4(11):e796-e805. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00170-4.
6
[The SPRINT Research. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control].[收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)研究。强化与标准血压控制的随机试验]
Vnitr Lek. 2016 Jan;62(1):44-7.
7
Association of Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity With Survival: A Secondary Analysis of SPRINT.估算脉搏波速度与生存的关联:SPRINT 的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912831. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12831.
8
Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Target After SPRINT: Insights from a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.SPRINT 试验后最佳收缩压目标:来自随机试验网络荟萃分析的见解
Am J Med. 2017 Jun;130(6):707-719.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
9
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
10
Personalizing the Intensity of Blood Pressure Control: Modeling the Heterogeneity of Risks and Benefits From SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).个性化血压控制强度:对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)风险和获益的异质性进行建模
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003624.

引用本文的文献

1
The Particularities of Arterial Hypertension in Female Sex: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Management.女性动脉高血压的特殊性:从病理生理学到治疗管理
J Clin Med. 2025 May 1;14(9):3137. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093137.
2
Dietary antioxidant index and hypertension in the Iranian population: a nested case-control study within the Fasa adults cohort study.伊朗人群的膳食抗氧化指数与高血压:法萨成年人队列研究中的一项巢式病例对照研究
Front Nutr. 2024 Dec 6;11:1476122. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1476122. eCollection 2024.
3
Self-measured home blood pressure highlights cardiovascular risk in women: the HOMED-BP study.
家庭自测血压凸显女性心血管风险:家庭血压(HOMED-BP)研究
Hypertens Res. 2023 Oct;46(10):2400-2408. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01408-6. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
Sex and hypertensive organ damage: stroke.性别与高血压器官损害:卒中。
J Hum Hypertens. 2023 Aug;37(8):644-648. doi: 10.1038/s41371-023-00830-0. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
5
Sex differences in arterial hypertension.动脉高血压的性别差异。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Dec 7;43(46):4777-4788. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac470.
6
Characterizing Diagnostic Inertia in Arterial Hypertension With a Gender Perspective in Primary Care.从性别视角在初级保健中对动脉高血压诊断惰性的特征分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 16;9:874764. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.874764. eCollection 2022.
7
Sex Differences in the Prevalence, Outcomes and Management of Hypertension.高血压的患病率、结局和管理中的性别差异。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2022 Jun;24(6):185-192. doi: 10.1007/s11906-022-01183-8. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
8
Sex differences in workload-indexed blood pressure response and vascular function among professional athletes and their utility for clinical exercise testing.运动员群体中心血管功能和血压反应的性别差异与工作量指数之间的关系,及其在临床运动测试中的应用。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Jul;121(7):1859-1869. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04656-x. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
9
Age and sex specific target of blood pressure for the prevention of cardiovascular event among the treatment naive hypertensive patients.降压治疗的高血压患者心血管事件预防的血压年龄和性别特定目标。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 9;10(1):21538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78641-3.
10
Summary of Updated Recommendations for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.更新的女性心血管疾病一级预防推荐要点总结:JACC 最新观点综述。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 26;75(20):2602-2618. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.060.