• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转发风险沟通:威胁和效能的作用。

Retweeting Risk Communication: The Role of Threat and Efficacy.

机构信息

University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2018 Dec;38(12):2580-2598. doi: 10.1111/risa.13140. Epub 2018 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13140
PMID:30080933
Abstract

Social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook provide risk communicators with the opportunity to quickly reach their constituents at the time of an emerging infectious disease. On these platforms, messages gain exposure through message passing (called "sharing" on Facebook and "retweeting" on Twitter). This raises the question of how to optimize risk messages for diffusion across networks and, as a result, increase message exposure. In this study we add to this growing body of research by identifying message-level strategies to increase message passing during high-ambiguity events. In addition, we draw on the extended parallel process model to examine how threat and efficacy information influence the passing of Zika risk messages. In August 2016, we collected 1,409 Twitter messages about Zika sent by U.S. public health agencies' accounts. Using content analysis methods, we identified intrinsic message features and then analyzed the influence of those features, the account sending the message, the network surrounding the account, and the saliency of Zika as a topic, using negative binomial regression. The results suggest that severity and efficacy information increase how frequently messages get passed on to others. Drawing on the results of this study, previous research on message passing, and diffusion theories, we identify a framework for risk communication on social media. This framework includes four key variables that influence message passing and identifies a core set of message strategies, including message timing, to increase exposure to risk messages on social media during high-ambiguity events.

摘要

社交媒体平台(如 Twitter 和 Facebook)为风险沟通者提供了在新发传染病出现时及时接触目标人群的机会。在这些平台上,信息通过消息传递(在 Facebook 上称为“分享”,在 Twitter 上称为“转发”)获得曝光。这就提出了一个问题,即如何优化风险信息,以便在网络中传播,从而增加信息曝光度。在这项研究中,我们通过确定在高模糊性事件中增加消息传递的消息级别策略,为这一不断增长的研究领域做出了贡献。此外,我们借鉴扩展平行过程模型来检验威胁和效能信息如何影响寨卡风险信息的传递。2016 年 8 月,我们收集了美国公共卫生机构账户发布的 1409 条关于寨卡的 Twitter 消息。使用内容分析方法,我们确定了内在消息特征,然后使用负二项回归分析了这些特征、发送消息的账户、账户所在的网络以及寨卡作为话题的显著性对消息传递的影响。结果表明,严重性和效能信息增加了消息被他人转发的频率。根据这项研究的结果、以前关于消息传递的研究和扩散理论,我们确定了一个社交媒体风险沟通框架。该框架包括四个影响消息传递的关键变量,并确定了一组核心的消息策略,包括消息时机,以在高模糊性事件期间增加社交媒体上的风险信息曝光度。

相似文献

1
Retweeting Risk Communication: The Role of Threat and Efficacy.转发风险沟通:威胁和效能的作用。
Risk Anal. 2018 Dec;38(12):2580-2598. doi: 10.1111/risa.13140. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
2
Platform Effects on Public Health Communication: A Comparative and National Study of Message Design and Audience Engagement Across Twitter and Facebook.平台对公共卫生传播的影响:一项关于推特和脸书上信息设计与受众参与度的比较性全国研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Dec 20;2(2):e40198. doi: 10.2196/40198. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
3
Identifying features of source and message that influence the retweeting of health information on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic.识别在新冠疫情期间影响社交媒体上健康信息转发的来源和信息特征。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):805. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13213-w.
4
COVID-19: Retransmission of official communications in an emerging pandemic.COVID-19:新兴大流行期间官方通讯的再传播。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238491. eCollection 2020.
5
How did Ebola information spread on twitter: broadcasting or viral spreading?埃博拉信息在推特上是如何传播的:广播还是病毒式传播?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6747-8.
6
What it Takes to Get Passed On: Message Content, Style, and Structure as Predictors of Retransmission in the Boston Marathon Bombing Response.信息得以传播的要素:在波士顿马拉松爆炸案应对中,信息内容、风格和结构作为再传播预测因素的研究
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0134452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134452. eCollection 2015.
7
Cutting Through the Noise: Predictors of Successful Online Message Retransmission in the First 8 Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic.拨开迷雾:COVID-19 大流行头 8 个月中成功在线消息重播的预测因素。
Health Secur. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):31-43. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0200.
8
Health Communication in Social Media: Message Features Predicting User Engagement on Diabetes-Related Facebook Pages.社交媒体中的健康传播:预测用户对糖尿病相关脸书页面参与度的信息特征
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):678-689. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9793-9.
9
A Software Tool Aimed at Automating the Generation, Distribution, and Assessment of Social Media Messages for Health Promotion and Education Research.一种旨在自动生成、分发和评估用于健康促进与教育研究的社交媒体信息的软件工具。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 May 7;5(2):e11263. doi: 10.2196/11263.
10
Celebrity Cancer on Twitter: Mapping a Novel Opportunity for Cancer Prevention.推特上的名人患癌事件:探寻癌症预防的新契机
Cancer Control. 2019 Jan-Dec;26(1):1073274819825826. doi: 10.1177/1073274819825826.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological crisis and emergency response in public health emergencies: a case study of the Mpox epidemic.突发公共卫生事件中的心理危机与应急响应:以猴痘疫情为例
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 22;13(1):956. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03309-4.
2
Chicago Public Health Department Social Media Communications on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Mpox Epidemic: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis.芝加哥公共卫生部在新冠疫情和猴痘疫情期间于推特上发布的社交媒体通信:横断面内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 18;27:e68200. doi: 10.2196/68200.
3
Lessons learned: enhancing rural risk communication for future health crises through the PHERCC framework.
经验教训:通过公共卫生应急风险沟通协作中心(PHERCC)框架加强农村地区未来卫生危机的风险沟通。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;13:1594833. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594833. eCollection 2025.
4
Wildfire and Smoke Risk Communication: A Systematic Literature Review from a Health Equity Focus.野火与烟雾风险沟通:以健康公平为重点的系统文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 3;22(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030368.
5
Enhancing risk and crisis communication with computational methods: A systematic literature review.利用计算方法加强风险与危机沟通:一项系统文献综述
Risk Anal. 2025 Jul;45(7):1683-1697. doi: 10.1111/risa.17690. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
6
Radon Risk Communication through News Stories: A Multi-Perspective Approach.氡风险传播的新闻报道视角:多视角分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 29;21(10):1302. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101302.
7
12 Tips for Engaging Medical Students in Health Communications.让医学生参与健康传播的12条建议。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Feb 16;10:48. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000048.1. eCollection 2021.
8
#4Corners4Health Social Media Cancer Prevention Campaign for Emerging Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial.面向新兴成年人的四角健康社交媒体癌症预防运动:一项随机阶梯楔形试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 22;13:e50392. doi: 10.2196/50392.
9
Clearing the air: evaluating institutions' social media health messaging on wildfire and smoke risks in the US Pacific Northwest.净化空气:评估美国太平洋西北地区各机构在社交媒体上发布的有关野火和烟雾风险的健康信息
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17907-1.
10
Community engagement through social media: A promising low-cost strategy for rural recruitment?社交媒体的社区参与:农村招募的有前途的低成本策略?
J Rural Health. 2024 Jun;40(3):467-475. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12809. Epub 2023 Nov 20.