Suppr超能文献

密歇根州工业和职业部门的不良健康结果。

Adverse Health Outcomes Among Industrial and Occupational Sectors in Michigan.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, 909 Fee Rd, Room 120 West Fee, East Lansing, Michigan 48824. Email:

Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Aug 9;15:E102. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170487.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We used data from the Michigan Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (MIBRFSS) to estimate the prevalence of adverse health outcomes by industry and occupation and to examine the association of adverse health outcomes with industry and occupation while controlling for demographics and personal lifestyle behaviors.

METHODS

We calculated the prevalence of adverse health outcomes by industry by using data from the 2013-2015 MIBRFSS. Adjusted prevalence of adverse health outcomes was calculated by industry and occupation by using logistic regression for survey design, adjusting for demographics and health behaviors, and was compared with the overall prevalence in all industries and occupations.

RESULTS

Three industries had a significantly higher prevalence of current asthma, diabetes, and depression compared with prevalence among workers employed in all industries. After controlling for confounding factors, only Health Care and Social Assistance had significantly higher prevalence of a health outcome, depression (20.1%). Three occupations had significantly higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, current asthma, depression, high blood pressure, and diabetes compared with workers employed in all occupations. After adjusting for all confounding factors, only one occupation, protective service, had a significantly higher prevalence of high blood pressure (37.3%) and diabetes (12.8%).

CONCLUSION

Adverse health outcomes varied significantly by industry and occupation in Michigan. Employers, policy makers, and health promotion practitioners can use results based on BRFSS to target and prioritize worksite wellness programs. MIBRFSS data also suggested the need for further research to identify why some industries had higher risks for diabetes, hypertension, and depression after controlling for covariates.

摘要

简介

我们使用密歇根行为风险因素监测系统(MIBRFSS)的数据,估算了不同行业和职业的不良健康结果的流行率,并在控制人口统计学和个人生活方式行为的同时,研究了不良健康结果与行业和职业之间的关联。

方法

我们利用 2013-2015 年 MIBRFSS 的数据,按行业计算了不良健康结果的流行率。我们通过使用用于调查设计的逻辑回归,按行业和职业计算了调整后的不良健康结果的流行率,调整了人口统计学和健康行为因素,并将其与所有行业和职业的总体流行率进行了比较。

结果

有三个行业的当前哮喘、糖尿病和抑郁症的流行率明显高于所有行业工人的流行率。在控制了混杂因素后,只有卫生保健和社会援助行业的抑郁(20.1%)的流行率显著更高。有三个职业的慢性阻塞性肺疾病、当前哮喘、抑郁、高血压和糖尿病的流行率明显高于所有职业的工人。在调整了所有混杂因素后,只有一个职业,即保护服务,高血压(37.3%)和糖尿病(12.8%)的流行率显著更高。

结论

密歇根州的不良健康结果在不同行业和职业之间存在显著差异。雇主、政策制定者和健康促进从业者可以使用 BRFSS 结果来针对工作场所健康计划进行目标定位和优先排序。MIBRFSS 数据还表明,需要进一步研究,以确定为什么在控制了协变量后,某些行业的糖尿病、高血压和抑郁症风险更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b945/6093263/2e09e259aea2/PCD-15-E102s01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验