Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Acad Radiol. 2019 May;26(5):608-619. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
High mammographic density reduces the diagnostic accuracy of screening mammography due to masking of tumors, resulting in possible delayed diagnosis and missed cancers. Women with high masking risk could be preselected for alternative screening regimens less susceptible to masking. In this study, various models to predict masking status are presented based on biometric and image-based parameters.
For a cohort of 67 nonscreen-detected (cancers detected via other means after a negative mammogram) and 147 screen-detected invasive cancers, quantitative volumetric breast density, BI-RADS density, and the distribution and appearance of dense tissue through statistical and texture metrics were measured. Age and Body Mass Index were recorded. Stepwise multivariate logistic regressions were computed to select those parameters that predicted nonscreen-detected cancers. Accuracy of the models was evaluated using the area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).
Using BI-RADS density alone to predict masking risk yielded an AUC of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [0.57-0.70]). Age-adjusted BI-RADS density or volumetric breast density had AUCs of 0.72 [0.64-0.79] and 0.71 [0.62-0.78], respectively. A model extracted from the full pool of variables had an AUC of 0.75 [0.67-0.82].
The optimal model predicts masking more accurately than density alone, suggesting that texture metrics may be useful in models to guide a stratified screening strategy.
高乳房密度由于肿瘤的遮蔽而降低了筛查乳房 X 光摄影术的诊断准确性,导致可能的延迟诊断和癌症漏诊。具有高遮蔽风险的女性可以预先选择对遮蔽不太敏感的替代筛查方案。在这项研究中,提出了各种基于生物计量学和基于图像的参数来预测遮蔽状态的模型。
对于 67 例非筛查检测到的(通过阴性乳房 X 光检查后通过其他手段检测到的癌症)和 147 例筛查检测到的浸润性癌症的队列,通过统计和纹理度量来测量定量容积乳房密度、BI-RADS 密度以及致密组织的分布和外观。记录年龄和体重指数。进行逐步多变量逻辑回归以选择那些预测非筛查检测到癌症的参数。使用接收者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积评估模型的准确性。
仅使用 BI-RADS 密度来预测遮蔽风险的 AUC 为 0.64(95%置信区间 [0.57-0.70])。年龄调整后的 BI-RADS 密度或容积乳房密度的 AUC 分别为 0.72 [0.64-0.79] 和 0.71 [0.62-0.78]。从全变量池中提取的模型的 AUC 为 0.75 [0.67-0.82]。
最佳模型比单独的密度更准确地预测遮蔽,这表明纹理度量可能对指导分层筛查策略的模型有用。