Rodriguez John D, Lane Keith, Hollander David A, Shapiro Aron, Saigal Sunita, Hertsenberg Andrew J, Wallstrom Garrick, Narayanan Divya, Angjeli Endri, Abelson Mark B
Ora, Inc., Andover, MA, USA,
Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 27;12:1325-1335. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S165658. eCollection 2018.
To identify parameters from cone function and recovery after photostress that detect functional deficits in early non-exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to determine the repeatability of these parameters.
Cone-mediated visual function recovery after photostress was examined in three groups of subjects: young normal subjects (ages 20-29; N=8), older normal subjects (ages 50-90; N=9), and early non-exudative AMD subjects (ages 50-90; N=12). Eight AMD and four normal subjects were retested 1 year after the initial evaluation. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) and parameters of cone function (baseline cone sensitivity and cone recovery half-life following photobleach) were measured and compared between AMD and normal subjects. Short-term repeatability was assessed for each subject's initial evaluation. Long-term repeatability was assessed by comparing outcomes from the initial evaluation and 1-year follow-up.
The mean baseline cone threshold was significantly worse in subjects with early AMD compared to older normal subjects (-1.80±0.04 vs -1.57±0.06 log cd/m=0.0027). Moreover, the baseline cone threshold parameter exhibited good short-term (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.88) and long-term (ICC=0.85) repeatability in all subjects. The cone intercept parameter and ETDRS VA were not significantly different between AMD and older normal subject groups. Cone recovery half-life was significantly different between older normal and AMD subject groups (=0.041). Neither ETDRS VA nor cone function parameters were significantly different for any group at the 1-year follow-up.
The baseline cone threshold shows potential as a novel parameter to assess visual dysfunction in early AMD. This outcome consistently detected deficits in AMD subjects, and differentiated them from age-matched controls with high test-retest repeatability.
从视锥细胞功能和光应激后的恢复情况中识别参数,以检测早期非渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)中的功能缺陷,并确定这些参数的可重复性。
对三组受试者进行光应激后视锥细胞介导的视觉功能恢复情况检查:年轻正常受试者(20 - 29岁;N = 8)、老年正常受试者(50 - 90岁;N = 9)和早期非渗出性AMD受试者(50 - 90岁;N = 12)。8名AMD受试者和4名正常受试者在初次评估1年后进行重新测试。测量并比较AMD受试者和正常受试者的早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)视力(VA)以及视锥细胞功能参数(基线视锥细胞敏感性和光漂白后视锥细胞恢复半衰期)。对每位受试者的初次评估进行短期可重复性评估。通过比较初次评估和1年随访的结果来评估长期可重复性。
与老年正常受试者相比,早期AMD受试者的平均基线视锥细胞阈值明显更差(-1.80±0.04对-1.57±0.06 log cd/m²,P = 0.0027)。此外,基线视锥细胞阈值参数在所有受试者中表现出良好的短期(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.88)和长期(ICC = 0.85)可重复性。AMD受试者组和老年正常受试者组之间的视锥细胞截距参数和ETDRS VA无显著差异。老年正常受试者组和AMD受试者组之间的视锥细胞恢复半衰期有显著差异(P = 0.041)。在1年随访时,任何组的ETDRS VA和视锥细胞功能参数均无显著差异。
基线视锥细胞阈值显示出作为评估早期AMD视觉功能障碍的新参数的潜力。这一结果始终能检测出AMD受试者的缺陷,并将他们与年龄匹配的对照组区分开来,且具有较高的重测可重复性。