Wolffsohn J S, Anderson S J, Mitchell J, Woodcock A, Rubinstein M, Ffytche T, Browning A, Willbond K, Amoaku W M, Bradley C
School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;90(4):432-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.085787.
To assess the repeatability of Eger macular stressometer (EMS) measures of photostress recovery and determine their association with other measures of visual function.
EMS photostress recovery time was measured in 90 patients with bilateral exudative age related macular degeneration (AMD), 19 with bilateral atrophic AMD and 47 with both forms of the condition (mean age 79 (SD 13) years). Measurements were made on two occasions separated by 1 year. Intrasession repeatability was assessed by repeating the measures after a 10 minute recovery period at the first visit. Distance visual acuity was measured with a logMAR chart, near visual acuity with a MNRead chart at 25 cm, contrast sensitivity with a Pelli-Robson chart, and the presence of central visual disturbance assessed with an Amsler grid. A questionnaire was used to assess self reported difficulties with glare recovery.
The average EMS recovery time was 11.0 (SD 8.9) seconds, decreasing by 1.6 (5.2) seconds on repeated measurement (p<0.05). EMS photostress recovery was not correlated with visual function measures or subjective difficulties with lights (p>0.05). EMS photostress recovery time did not predict those whose vision decreased over the following year compared with those among whom it remained stable.
The EMS test is not a useful tool in determining the severity or progression of AMD.
评估埃格尔黄斑应力计(EMS)测量光应激恢复的可重复性,并确定其与其他视觉功能测量指标的关联。
对90例双侧渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者、19例双侧萎缩性AMD患者和47例两种类型均有的患者(平均年龄79(标准差13)岁)进行EMS光应激恢复时间测量。测量在相隔1年的两个时间点进行。通过在首次就诊时10分钟恢复期后重复测量来评估测量期间的可重复性。用对数最小分辨角视力表测量远视力,用25 cm处的MNRead视力表测量近视力,用佩利-罗布森视力表测量对比敏感度,并用阿姆斯勒方格表评估中心视觉障碍的存在情况。使用问卷评估自我报告的眩光恢复困难情况。
EMS平均恢复时间为11.0(标准差8.9)秒,重复测量时减少了1.6(5.2)秒(p<0.05)。EMS光应激恢复与视觉功能测量指标或灯光引起的主观困难无关(p>0.05)。与视力保持稳定的患者相比,EMS光应激恢复时间无法预测下一年视力下降的患者。
EMS测试在确定AMD的严重程度或进展方面不是一个有用的工具。