• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用临床医生评定和患者自评数据来检查创伤后应激障碍症状网络。

Examination of posttraumatic stress disorder symptom networks using clinician-rated and patient-rated data.

机构信息

Research Service, VA Boston Healthcare System.

Behavioral Sciences Division, Department of Veterans Affairs Boston National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Aug;127(6):541-547. doi: 10.1037/abn0000368.

DOI:10.1037/abn0000368
PMID:30102064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7059999/
Abstract

Network theory, which conceptualizes psychiatric disorders as networks of interacting symptoms, may provide a useful framework for understanding psychopathology. However, questions have arisen regarding the stability and generalizability of network analytic methods, with some researchers arguing that symptom networks have limited replicability. The aim of this study was to evaluate assessment modality as one possible source of instability in the estimation of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom networks. We estimated two cross-sectional DSM-5 PTSD symptom networks in 378 U.S. veterans: one using data from a clinician-rated assessment instrument (Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5; CAPS-5) and one using data from a self-rated questionnaire (the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5; PCL-5). We calculated centrality indices, conducted community structure analyses, and compared the strength and structure of the networks. The CAPS-5 and PCL-5 symptom networks were highly similar, challenging the notion that network methods produce unreliable results due to estimations consisting primarily of measurement error. Furthermore, each network contained distinct symptom communities that only partially overlapped with the DSM-5 PTSD symptom clusters. These findings may provide guidance for future revisions of the DSM, suggest hypotheses about how PTSD symptoms interact, and inform recent debate about replicability of psychopathology symptom networks. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

网络理论将精神障碍概念化为相互作用的症状网络,可能为理解精神病理学提供有用的框架。然而,关于网络分析方法的稳定性和普遍性的问题已经出现,一些研究人员认为症状网络的可重复性有限。本研究旨在评估评估方式是否是 PTSD 症状网络估计中不稳定的一个可能来源。我们在 378 名美国退伍军人中估计了两个横断面 DSM-5 PTSD 症状网络:一个使用来自临床医生评定的评估工具(DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍临床医生评定量表;CAPS-5)的数据,另一个使用来自自我评定问卷(DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表;PCL-5)的数据。我们计算了中心性指数,进行了社区结构分析,并比较了网络的强度和结构。CAPS-5 和 PCL-5 症状网络非常相似,这挑战了网络方法由于主要由测量误差组成而产生不可靠结果的观点。此外,每个网络都包含独特的症状社区,这些社区仅与 DSM-5 PTSD 症状群部分重叠。这些发现可能为 DSM 的未来修订提供指导,提出关于 PTSD 症状如何相互作用的假设,并为最近关于精神病理学症状网络可重复性的争论提供信息。

相似文献

1
Examination of posttraumatic stress disorder symptom networks using clinician-rated and patient-rated data.使用临床医生评定和患者自评数据来检查创伤后应激障碍症状网络。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Aug;127(6):541-547. doi: 10.1037/abn0000368.
2
Evaluating the stability of DSM-5 PTSD symptom network structure in a national sample of U.S. military veterans.评估 DSM-5 PTSD 症状网络结构在美退役军人全国样本中的稳定性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.043. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
3
Latent factor structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder: Evaluation of method variance and construct validity of novel symptom clusters.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍的潜在因子结构:新症状群的方法偏差和建构效度评估。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Jan;31(1):46-58. doi: 10.1037/pas0000642. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
4
Concordance in PTSD symptom change between DSM-5 versions of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) and PTSD Checklist (PCL-5).DSM-5 版临床医生管理创伤后应激障碍量表 (CAPS-5) 和创伤后应激障碍检查表 (PCL-5) 在 PTSD 症状变化方面的一致性。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jun;34(6):604-609. doi: 10.1037/pas0001130. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans.用于 DSM-5 的临床医生管理 PTSD 量表(CAPS-5):退伍军人中的开发和初步心理计量评估。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Mar;30(3):383-395. doi: 10.1037/pas0000486. Epub 2017 May 11.
6
Self-Rated Versus Clinician-Rated Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Evaluation of Discrepancies Between the PTSD Checklist for and the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for .自评与临床医生评定创伤后应激障碍:对 PTSD 检查表与 PTSD 量表之间差异的评估。
Assessment. 2023 Jul;30(5):1590-1605. doi: 10.1177/10731911221113571. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
7
Psychometric properties of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale Interview for DSM-5 (PSSI-5).创伤后应激障碍症状量表访谈用于 DSM-5(PSSI-5)的心理测量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Oct;28(10):1159-1165. doi: 10.1037/pas0000259. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
8
27 ways to meet PTSD: Using the PTSD-checklist for DSM-5 to examine PTSD core criteria.27 种遇见创伤后应激障碍的方式:使用 DSM-5 的创伤后应激障碍检查表来检查 PTSD 核心标准。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:504-507. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
9
Reliable and clinically significant change in the clinician-administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 among male veterans.男性退伍军人的 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍量表和 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表中的临床医生管理 PTSD 量表具有可靠且有临床意义的变化。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Feb;34(2):197-203. doi: 10.1037/pas0001098. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
10
Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)在退伍军人中的心理测量特性
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1379-1391. doi: 10.1037/pas0000254. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Network psychometrics and the network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: A conceptual and methodological overview.网络心理测量学与创伤后应激障碍的网络方法:概念与方法概述。
J Trauma Stress. 2025 Jun;38(3):363-375. doi: 10.1002/jts.23135. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
2
Network analysis of the symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in patients undergoing chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.接受结直肠癌化疗患者创伤后应激障碍症状的网络分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 8;15:1505518. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1505518. eCollection 2024.
3
Gender Minority Stressors and Psychological Distress Among Chinese Transgender and Gender Diverse People: Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Psychological Network Approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test.比较网络结构的三个方面:置换检验。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Dec;28(6):1273-1285. doi: 10.1037/met0000476. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Replicability and Generalizability of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Networks: A Cross-Cultural Multisite Study of PTSD Symptoms in Four Trauma Patient Samples.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)网络的可重复性和普遍性:四项创伤患者样本中PTSD症状的跨文化多地点研究
Clin Psychol Sci. 2018 May;6(3):335-351. doi: 10.1177/2167702617745092. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
Evaluating the stability of DSM-5 PTSD symptom network structure in a national sample of U.S. military veterans.
跨性别和性别多样化人群中的性别少数压力源与心理困扰:变量中心、个体中心和心理网络方法。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Nov;53(10):3945-3972. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03003-3. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
Network analysis of body-related complaints in patients with neurotic or personality disorders referred to psychotherapy.转诊接受心理治疗的神经症或人格障碍患者身体相关主诉的网络分析
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 24;9(3):e14078. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14078. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Validating the primary care posttraumatic stress disorder screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) in a substance misusing, trauma-exposed, socioeconomically vulnerable population.验证用于物质滥用、创伤暴露、社会经济弱势群体的 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍筛查(PC-PTSD-5)的主要护理筛查。
Addict Behav. 2023 Apr;139:107592. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107592. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
6
Real-world outcomes of an innovative digital therapeutic for treatment of panic disorder and PTSD: A 1,500 patient effectiveness study.一种用于治疗惊恐障碍和创伤后应激障碍的创新数字疗法的真实世界疗效:一项纳入1500名患者的有效性研究。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Nov 17;4:976001. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.976001. eCollection 2022.
7
Characterizing veteran and PTSD service dog teams: Exploring potential mechanisms of symptom change and canine predictors of efficacy.描述退伍军人和 PTSD 服务犬团队的特点:探索症状变化的潜在机制和犬类疗效预测指标。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 27;17(7):e0269186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269186. eCollection 2022.
8
The efficacy and acceptability of exposure therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.暴露疗法治疗儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍的疗效和可接受性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 12;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03867-6.
9
Examining the associations between PTSD symptoms and aspects of emotion dysregulation through network analysis.通过网络分析考察创伤后应激症状与情绪调节各方面之间的关联。
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Mar;86:102536. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102536. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
10
A network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder: Comparing interview and self-report networks.一种创伤后应激障碍的网络方法:比较访谈和自我报告网络。
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Feb;16(2):340-346. doi: 10.1037/tra0001151. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
评估 DSM-5 PTSD 症状网络结构在美退役军人全国样本中的稳定性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.043. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
4
False alarm? A comprehensive reanalysis of "Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability" by Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger (2017).误报?对福布斯、赖特、马尔科恩和克鲁格(2017年)所著的《心理病理学症状网络的可复制性有限的证据》进行全面重新分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Oct;126(7):989-999. doi: 10.1037/abn0000306.
5
Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability.精神病理学症状网络具有有限可重复性的证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Oct;126(7):969-988. doi: 10.1037/abn0000276.
6
Moving Forward: Challenges and Directions for Psychopathological Network Theory and Methodology.向前推进:心理病理网络理论和方法的挑战与方向。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):999-1020. doi: 10.1177/1745691617705892. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
7
The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans.用于 DSM-5 的临床医生管理 PTSD 量表(CAPS-5):退伍军人中的开发和初步心理计量评估。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Mar;30(3):383-395. doi: 10.1037/pas0000486. Epub 2017 May 11.
8
Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper.估计心理网络及其准确性:教程论文。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1.
9
Network models of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder: Implications for ICD-11.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍的网络模型:对《国际疾病分类》第11版的启示
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Apr;126(3):355-366. doi: 10.1037/abn0000252. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
10
A network theory of mental disorders.精神障碍的网络理论。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):5-13. doi: 10.1002/wps.20375.