University of Delaware.
Florida Atlantic University.
Child Dev. 2019 May;90(3):985-992. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13128. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
Sperry, Sperry, and Miller (2018) aim to debunk what is called the 30-million-word gap by claiming that children from lower income households hear more speech than Hart and Risley () reported. We address why the 30-million-word gap should not be abandoned, and the importance of retaining focus on the vital ingredient to language learning-quality speech directed to children rather than overheard speech, the focus of Sperry et al.'s argument. Three issues are addressed: Whether there is a language gap; the characteristics of speech that promote language development; and the importance of language in school achievement. There are serious risks to claims that low-income children, on average, hear sufficient, high-quality language relative to peers from higher income homes.
斯佩里、斯佩里和米勒(2018)旨在驳斥所谓的 3000 万词汇差距,声称来自低收入家庭的孩子听到的语言比哈特和里斯利()报道的要多。我们将讨论为什么不应该放弃 3000 万词汇差距,以及关注语言学习的重要因素——针对儿童的高质量言语,而不是被动听到的言语,这是斯佩里等人论点的重点。文中讨论了三个问题:是否存在语言差距;促进语言发展的言语特征;以及语言在学业成绩中的重要性。声称低收入儿童平均听到的语言与来自高收入家庭的同龄人一样充足、高质量,这种说法存在严重风险。