• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从证据更新中得出复制贝叶斯因子。

Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating.

机构信息

Psychological Methods Department, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15906, 1001, NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Machine Learning Group, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2498-2508. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1092-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-018-1092-x
PMID:30105445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6877488/
Abstract

We describe a general method that allows experimenters to quantify the evidence from the data of a direct replication attempt given data already acquired from an original study. These so-called replication Bayes factors are a reconceptualization of the ones introduced by Verhagen and Wagenmakers (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1457-1475 2014) for the common t test. This reconceptualization is computationally simpler and generalizes easily to most common experimental designs for which Bayes factors are available.

摘要

我们描述了一种通用方法,该方法允许实验者在已经从原始研究中获得数据的情况下,根据直接复制尝试的数据来量化证据。这些所谓的复制贝叶斯因子是对 Verhagen 和 Wagenmakers(2014 年《实验心理学杂志:一般》,第 143(4)卷,1457-1475 页)为常见 t 检验引入的因子的重新概念化。这种重新概念化在计算上更简单,并且易于推广到大多数可提供贝叶斯因子的常见实验设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/72c097ae9220/13428_2018_1092_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/5cade8dae093/13428_2018_1092_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/74809ed1f099/13428_2018_1092_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/5875b6dc58a1/13428_2018_1092_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/45e773d4732f/13428_2018_1092_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/44edeee86881/13428_2018_1092_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/72c097ae9220/13428_2018_1092_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/5cade8dae093/13428_2018_1092_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/74809ed1f099/13428_2018_1092_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/5875b6dc58a1/13428_2018_1092_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/45e773d4732f/13428_2018_1092_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/44edeee86881/13428_2018_1092_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8638/6877488/72c097ae9220/13428_2018_1092_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating.从证据更新中得出复制贝叶斯因子。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2498-2508. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1092-x.
2
Bayes Factors Have Frequency Properties-This Should Not Be Ignored: A Rejoinder to Morey, Wagenmakers, and Rouder.贝叶斯因子具有频率属性——这一点不容忽视:对莫雷、瓦根梅克斯和劳德的回应
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016;51(1):20-2. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1071705.
3
On the white, the black, and the many shades of gray in between: Our reply to Van Ravenzwaaij and Wagenmakers (2021).在白色、黑色和两者之间的诸多灰色地带:我们对范拉文斯瓦伊杰和 Wagenmakers(2021)的回应。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Jun;27(3):466-475. doi: 10.1037/met0000505.
4
Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?重复零结果:无证据还是缺乏证据?
Elife. 2024 May 13;12:RP92311. doi: 10.7554/eLife.92311.
5
A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.贝叶斯因子假设检验教程。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Oct;24(5):539-556. doi: 10.1037/met0000201. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
6
Using Bayesian analysis for hypothesis testing in addiction science.在成瘾科学中使用贝叶斯分析进行假设检验。
Addiction. 2016 Jan;111(1):3-4. doi: 10.1111/add.13053. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
7
Bayesian hypothesis testing for single-subject designs.贝叶斯假设检验在单被试设计中的应用。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Jun;18(2):165-85. doi: 10.1037/a0031037. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
8
The frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests.贝叶斯假设检验中可选择停止的频率主义影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):283-300. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0518-9.
9
A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem's ESP claim.贝叶斯因子元分析贝姆超感知觉主张
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):682-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0088-7.
10
Calibrated Bayes Factors Should Not Be Used: A Reply to Hoijtink, van Kooten, and Hulsker.不应使用校准贝叶斯因子:对霍伊廷克、范库滕和胡尔斯克的回应。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016;51(1):11-9. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1052710.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the phonological, musical, and general cognitive profiles of early-emerging poor, average, and good readers of Chinese.比较早期出现的中文阅读能力较差、中等和优秀的读者在语音、音乐和一般认知方面的特征。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 29;16:1563491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1563491. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigating mu and alpha oscillations as indicators of intra-individual success and inter-individual ability in motor imagery performance.研究μ波和α波振荡作为运动想象表现中个体内成功和个体间能力指标的情况。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 25;16:1598196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1598196. eCollection 2025.
3
The neural signatures of the psychological construct "flow": A replication study.

本文引用的文献

1
A tutorial on bridge sampling.桥抽样教程。
J Math Psychol. 2017 Dec;81:80-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2017.09.005.
2
Making replication mainstream.让复制成为主流。
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Oct 25;41:e120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001972.
3
Fixed or Random? A Resolution Through Model Averaging: Reply to Carlsson, Schimmack, Williams, and Bürkner (2017).固定效应还是随机效应?通过模型平均法解决:对卡尔松、施密马克、威廉姆斯和比克纳(2017年)的回应
心理建构“心流”的神经特征:一项重复研究。
Neuroimage Rep. 2022 Oct 10;2(4):100139. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100139. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Neural Mechanisms Supporting the Relationship between Working Memory Capacity and Proactive Control.支持工作记忆容量与主动控制之间关系的神经机制。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 12:2025.05.09.653198. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.09.653198.
5
How can we make sound replication decisions?我们如何做出合理的复制决策?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 4;122(5):e2401236121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401236121. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
6
Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market.检验由决策市场挑选出的在线实验的可重复性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Feb;9(2):316-330. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02062-9. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
7
Electrophysiological dynamics of salience, default mode, and frontoparietal networks during episodic memory formation and recall revealed through multi-experiment iEEG replication.通过多实验 iEEG 复制揭示了情景记忆形成和回忆过程中突显、默认模式和额顶网络的电生理动力学。
Elife. 2024 Nov 18;13:RP99018. doi: 10.7554/eLife.99018.
8
Model-averaged Bayesian t tests.模型平均贝叶斯t检验
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1007-1031. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02590-5. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
9
Distinct Mindfulness States Produce Dissociable Effects on Neural Markers of Emotion Processing: Evidence From the Late Positive Potential.不同的正念状态对情绪加工的神经标志物产生可分离的影响:来自晚期正电位的证据。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024 Jun 29;4(5):100357. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100357. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Frequency-specific directed connectivity between the hippocampus and parietal cortex during verbal and spatial episodic memory: an intracranial EEG replication.内侧颞叶与顶叶皮层在言语和空间情景记忆中的频率特异性定向连接:一项颅内 EEG 复制研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jul 3;34(7). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae287.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1698-1701. doi: 10.1177/0956797617724426. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
Using Bayes factors to evaluate evidence for no effect: examples from the SIPS project.运用贝叶斯因子评估无效应证据:来自 SIPS 项目的实例。
Addiction. 2018 Feb;113(2):240-246. doi: 10.1111/add.14002. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
5
Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications.贝叶斯推断在心理学中的应用。第一部分:理论优势与实际影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):35-57. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3.
6
Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP.贝叶斯推断在心理学中的应用。第二部分:使用 JASP 的实例应用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):58-76. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7.
7
Introduction to Bayesian Inference for Psychology.心理学贝叶斯推断导论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):5-34. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1262-3.
8
Four reasons to prefer Bayesian analyses over significance testing.四个偏爱贝叶斯分析而非显著性检验的理由。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):207-218. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1266-z.
9
A Bayesian bird's eye view of 'Replications of important results in social psychology'.对“社会心理学重要研究结果的重复验证”的贝叶斯全景式观察。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 18;4(1):160426. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160426. eCollection 2017 Jan.
10
Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence.贝叶斯因子设计分析:为有力证据进行规划。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):128-142. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y.