University of Parma, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Parma, Italy.
Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Center for Biomolecular Nanotechnologies, Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.
Brain. 2018 Oct 1;141(10):3035-3051. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy219.
The cingulate cortex is a mosaic of different anatomical fields, whose functional characterization is still a matter of debate. In humans, one method that may provide useful insights on the role of the different cingulate regions, and to tackle the issue of the functional differences between its anterior, middle and posterior subsectors, is intracortical electrical stimulation. While previous reports showed that a variety of integrated behaviours could be elicited by stimulating the midcingulate cortex, little is known about the effects of the electrical stimulation of anterior and posterior cingulate regions. Moreover, the internal arrangement of different behaviours within the midcingulate cortex is still unknown. In the present study, we extended previous stimulation studies by retrospectively analysing all the clinical manifestations induced by intracerebral high frequency electrical stimulation (50 Hz, pulse width: 1 ms, 5 s, current intensity: average intensity of 2.7 ± 0.7 mA, biphasic) of the entire cingulate cortex in a cohort of 329 drug-resistant epileptic patients (1789 stimulation sites) undergoing stereo-electroencephalography for a presurgical evaluation. The large number of patients, on one hand, and the accurate multimodal image-based localization of stereo-electroencephalography electrodes, on the other hand, allowed us to assign specific functional properties to modern anatomical subdivisions of the cingulate cortex. Behavioural or subjective responses were elicited from the 32.3% of all cingulate sites, mainly located in the pregenual and midcingulate regions. We found clear functional differences between the pregenual part of the cingulate cortex, hosting the majority of emotional, interoceptive and autonomic responses, and the anterior midcingulate sector, controlling the majority of all complex motor behaviours. Particularly interesting was the 'actotopic' organization of the anterior midcingulate sector, arranged along the ventro-dorsal axis: (i) whole-body behaviours directed to the extra-personal space, such as getting-up impulses, were elicited ventrally, close to the corpus callosum; (ii) hand actions in the peripersonal space were evoked by the stimulation of the intermediate position; and (iii) body-directed actions were induced by the stimulation of the dorsal branch of the cingulate sulcus. The caudal part of the midcingulate cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex were, in contrast, poorly excitable, and mainly devoted to sensory modalities. In particular, the caudal part of the midcingulate cortex hosted the majority of vestibular responses, while posterior cingulate cortex was the principal recipient of visual effects. We will discuss our data in the light of current controversies on the role of the cingulate cortex in cognition and emotion.
扣带皮层是由不同解剖区域组成的镶嵌体,其功能特征仍然存在争议。在人类中,一种可能为不同扣带区域的作用提供有用见解并解决其前、中、后亚区功能差异问题的方法是皮质内电刺激。虽然之前的报告表明,刺激中扣带皮层可以引发多种综合行为,但对于刺激前扣带和后扣带区域的电刺激的影响知之甚少。此外,中扣带皮层内不同行为的内部排列仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们通过回顾性分析 329 例接受立体脑电图检查的耐药性癫痫患者(1789 个刺激部位)整个扣带皮层高频电刺激(50 Hz,脉冲宽度:1 ms,5 s,电流强度:平均强度 2.7 ± 0.7 mA,双相)引起的所有临床表现,对先前的刺激研究进行了扩展。大量的患者,一方面,以及立体脑电图电极的精确多模态图像定位,另一方面,使我们能够将现代解剖学上的扣带皮层细分与特定的功能特性联系起来。32.3%的扣带区都能引出行为或主观反应,主要位于前扣带和中扣带区域。我们发现,扣带前回(前扣带回)和前中扣带区(中扣带前回)之间存在明显的功能差异,前扣带回主要控制情绪、内脏和自主反应,而前中扣带区主要控制所有复杂的运动行为。特别有趣的是前中扣带区的“动觉组织”,沿着腹背轴排列:(i)朝向身体外部的全身行为,如起床冲动,在靠近胼胝体的腹侧诱发;(ii)近体空间的手部动作由中间位置的刺激引起;(iii)身体指向的动作由扣带回沟背侧支的刺激引起。相比之下,中扣带皮质的尾侧部分和后扣带皮质则不易被激发,主要用于感觉模态。特别是中扣带皮质的尾侧部分主要接收前庭反应,而后扣带皮质主要接收视觉效应。我们将根据当前关于扣带皮层在认知和情感中的作用的争议来讨论我们的数据。