• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.利用一步法基因组最佳线性无偏预测进行选择时,选择性基因分型对反应的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2018 Nov 21;96(11):4532-4542. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky330.
2
Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine.基因型策略对纯种种猪模拟群体中基因组预测准确性的影响。
Animal. 2019 Sep;13(9):1804-1810. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003567. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
3
The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.降低使用 ssGBLUP1 在更高密度下对动物进行基因型检测的频率对估计和预测准确性的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2019 Jul 2;97(7):2780-2792. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz147.
4
Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.基于池数据的单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测框架的基因组预测。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Jun 1;98(6). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa184.
5
Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.利用选择性基因分型和表型策略的猪杂交方案中方差分量估计的偏差。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Nov 1;99(11). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab293.
6
Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.猪基因组评估中基因型、表型和系谱截断的界限。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad273.
7
Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.通过在猪、肉牛和肉鸡中最佳线性无偏预测和单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测的分歧趋势来检测基因组选择的有效起始点。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Sep 1;99(9). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab243.
8
Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.将未基因型化的 F1 母本估计值导入杂种猪选育计划以提高遗传增益。
J Anim Sci. 2022 May 1;100(5). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac148.
9
Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.在一个猪群中进行基因组选择,该猪群包含来自同胞测定计划中种公猪屠宰全同胞的信息。
Animal. 2015 May;9(5):750-9. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002924. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
10
Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values.使用单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测法的浅系谱对无偏基因组育种值预测的影响及实用性
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Oct 10;54(6):339. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03340-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic selection strategies to overcome genotype by environment interactions in biosecurity-based aquaculture breeding programs.在基于生物安全的水产养殖育种计划中克服基因型与环境相互作用的基因组选择策略。
Genet Sel Evol. 2025 Jan 22;57(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12711-025-00949-3.
2
The Effect of Preselection on the Level of Bias and Accuracy in a Broiler Breeder Population, a Simulation Study.预选择对肉种鸡群体偏差水平和准确性的影响:一项模拟研究
J Anim Breed Genet. 2025 Jul;142(4):392-407. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12908. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
3
Selective genotyping to implement genomic selection in beef cattle breeding.在肉牛育种中实施基因组选择的选择性基因分型。
Front Genet. 2023 Mar 17;14:1083106. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1083106. eCollection 2023.
4
Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.利用商业杂交群体数据进行猪的基因组预测:杜洛克×(长白猪×约克夏猪)三交杂种繁育体系的见解。
Genet Sel Evol. 2023 Mar 28;55(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00794-2.
5
Strategies for accommodating gene-edited sires and their descendants in genetic evaluations.在遗传评估中容纳基因编辑种畜及其后代的策略。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad077.
6
Selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder program.用于肉鸡育种计划的同胞测验方案的选择性基因分型策略。
Genet Sel Evol. 2023 Mar 7;55(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00785-3.
7
Optimizing the Construction and Update Strategies for the Genomic Selection of Pig Reference and Candidate Populations in China.优化中国猪参考群体和候选群体基因组选择的构建与更新策略
Front Genet. 2022 Jun 8;13:938947. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.938947. eCollection 2022.
8
Effect of genotyping strategies on the sustained benefit of single-step genomic BLUP over multiple generations.基因分型策略对单步基因组 BLUP 超过多代持续获益的影响。
Genet Sel Evol. 2022 Mar 18;54(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12711-022-00712-y.
9
Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.利用选择性基因分型和表型策略的猪杂交方案中方差分量估计的偏差。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Nov 1;99(11). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab293.
10
Simulation studies to optimize genomic selection in honey bees.优化蜜蜂基因组选择的模拟研究。
Genet Sel Evol. 2021 Jul 29;53(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12711-021-00654-x.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of the H scaling factors τ and ω on the structure of H in the single-step procedure.H 标度因子τ和ω对单步程序中 H 结构的影响。
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Apr 13;50(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0386-x.
2
Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.不同遗传趋势估计值来自传统和基因组评估的基因型动物作为美国荷斯坦牛预选择偏差的证据。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jun;101(6):5194-5206. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13310. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
3
Geno-Diver: A combined coalescence and forward-in-time simulator for populations undergoing selection for complex traits.基因分化模拟器(Geno-Diver):一种用于经历复杂性状选择的群体的合并与时间正向模拟相结合的模拟器。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2017 Dec;134(6):553-563. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12277. Epub 2017 May 2.
4
Single-step genomic evaluation using multitrait random regression model and test-day data.使用多性状随机回归模型和测定日数据进行单步基因组评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Apr;98(4):2775-84. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8975. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
5
Genomic selection for two traits in a maternal pig breeding scheme.母本猪育种方案中两个性状的基因组选择。
J Anim Sci. 2013 Jul;91(7):3079-87. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5113. Epub 2013 May 8.
6
A Bayesian method and its variational approximation for prediction of genomic breeding values in multiple traits.一种多性状基因组育种值预测的贝叶斯方法及其变分近似。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 31;14:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-34.
7
Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.基因组选择在纯种公猪品系中的效率。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4164-76. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5107. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
8
Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs.猪基因组评估的单步法。
Animal. 2012 Oct;6(10):1565-71. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000742. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
9
Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle: Strong positive interaction between use of genotypic information and intensive use of young bulls on genetic gain.奶牛的基因组选择策略:基因型信息的使用与年轻公牛的密集使用对遗传增益有很强的正交互作用。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2012 Apr;129(2):138-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00947.x. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
10
Accounting for genomic pre-selection in national BLUP evaluations in dairy cattle.在奶牛的全国 BLUP 评估中考虑基因组预选择。
Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Aug 18;43(1):30. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-30.

利用一步法基因组最佳线性无偏预测进行选择时,选择性基因分型对反应的影响。

The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.

DNA Genetics, Columbus, NE.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2018 Nov 21;96(11):4532-4542. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky330.

DOI:10.1093/jas/sky330
PMID:30107560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6247857/
Abstract

Across the majority livestock species, routinely collected genomic and pedigree information has been incorporated into evaluations using single-step methods. As a result, strategies that reduce genotyping costs without reducing the response to selection are important as they could have substantial economic impacts on breeding programs. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to investigate the impact of selectively genotyping selection candidates on the selection response using simulation. Populations were simulated to mimic the genome and population structure of a swine and cattle population undergoing selection on an index comprised of the estimated breeding values (EBV) for 2 genetically correlated quantitative traits. Ten generations were generated and genotyping began generation 7. Two phenotyping scenarios were simulated that assumed the first trait was recorded early in life on all individuals and the second trait was recorded on all versus a random subset of the individuals. The EBV were generated from a bivariate animal model. Multiple genotyping scenarios were generated that ranged from not genotyping any selection candidates, a proportion of the selection candidates based on either their index value or chosen at random, and genotyping all selection candidates. An interim index value was utilized to decide who to genotype for the selective genotype strategy. The interim value assumed only the first trait was observed and the only genotypic information available was on animals in previous generations. Within each genotyping scenario 25 replicates were generated. Within each genotyping scenario the mean response per generation and the degree to which EBV were inflated/deflated was calculated. Across both species and phenotyping strategies, the plateau of diminishing returns was observed when 60% of the selection candidates with the largest index values were genotyped. When randomly genotyping selection candidates, either 80 or 100% of the selection candidates needed to be genotyped for there not to be a reduction in the index response. Across both populations, no differences in the degree that EBV were inflated/deflated for either trait 1 or 2 were observed between nongenotyped and genotyped animals. The current study has shown that animals can be selectively genotyped in order to optimize the response to selection as a function of the cost to conduct a breeding program using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.

摘要

在大多数牲畜品种中,常规收集的基因组和系谱信息已被纳入使用单步方法进行的评估中。因此,降低基因分型成本而不降低选择反应的策略非常重要,因为它们可能对育种计划产生重大的经济影响。因此,本研究的目的是通过模拟研究有选择地对候选者进行基因分型对选择反应的影响。模拟种群以模拟猪和牛种群的基因组和群体结构,该种群在由两个遗传相关的数量性状的估计育种值 (EBV) 组成的指数上进行选择。生成了十代,从第 7 代开始进行基因分型。模拟了两种表型情况,假设第一个性状在所有个体的生命早期被记录,第二个性状在所有个体上或在个体的随机子集中被记录。EBV 是从双变量动物模型生成的。生成了多种基因分型方案,范围从不对任何选择候选者进行基因分型,基于候选者的指数值或随机选择的一部分进行基因分型,以及对所有选择候选者进行基因分型。使用中间指数值来决定对选择性基因分型策略进行基因分型的对象。中间值仅假设观察到第一个性状,并且可用的唯一基因型信息是前几代的动物。在每个基因分型方案中生成了 25 个重复。在每个基因分型方案中,计算了每代的平均响应以及 EBV 膨胀/缩小的程度。在两种物种和表型策略中,当最大指数值的 60%的选择候选者被基因分型时,观察到收益递减的平台。当随机对选择候选者进行基因分型时,需要对 80%或 100%的选择候选者进行基因分型,才能不降低指数反应。在两个群体中,对于第一个或第二个性状,未基因分型的动物和基因分型的动物之间,EBV 膨胀/缩小的程度没有差异。本研究表明,可以有选择地对动物进行基因分型,以优化选择反应,作为使用单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测进行育种计划的成本的函数。