F-18 FDG PET for assessment of disease activity of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18 FDG PET) or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the assessment of disease activity in patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

The MEDLINE via PubMed and EMBASE were searched for the studies evaluating the performance of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT in the assessment of disease activity in patients with LVV. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), and summary receiver-operating characteristic (sROC) curve were estimated across the included studies. Possible publication bias was assessed by Deek's funnel plot asymmetry tests.

RESULTS

A total of 439 PET images from 298 patients pooled from nine studies showed that the pooled sensitivity was 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-0.93] without heterogeneity (χ = 14.42, P = .07) and the pooled specificity was 0.81 (95% CI 0.64-0.91) with heterogeneity (χ = 63.72, P = .00) for the detection of active LVV. The pooled DOR was 30 (95% CI 8-107). Hierarchical sROC curve indicates that the area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.94). There was no significant publication bias (P = .42), and meta-regression analysis revealed that none of the variables was the source of the study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

F-18 FDG PET has a good performance for the detection of active disease status in patients with LVV. Revised criteria for the assessment of disease activity incorporated with F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT should be introduced and validated. Further studies are warranted to determine if PET-based treatment of LVV can improve outcomes.