Hsu Nina S, Jaeggi Susanne M, Novick Jared M
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, USA; Center for Advanced Study of Language, University of Maryland, College Park, USA; Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, USA; Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
School of Education, University of California, Irvine, USA; Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA.
Brain Lang. 2017 Mar;166:63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
Regions within the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) have simultaneously been implicated in syntactic processing and cognitive control. Accounts attempting to unify LIFG's function hypothesize that, during comprehension, cognitive control resolves conflict between incompatible representations of sentence meaning. Some studies demonstrate co-localized activity within LIFG for syntactic and non-syntactic conflict resolution, suggesting domain-generality, but others show non-overlapping activity, suggesting domain-specific cognitive control and/or regions that respond uniquely to syntax. We propose however that examining exclusive activation sites for certain contrasts creates a false dichotomy: both domain-general and domain-specific neural machinery must coordinate to facilitate conflict resolution across domains. Here, subjects completed four diverse tasks involving conflict -one syntactic, three non-syntactic- while undergoing fMRI. Though LIFG consistently activated within individuals during conflict processing, functional connectivity analyses revealed task-specific coordination with distinct brain networks. Thus, LIFG may function as a conflict-resolution "hub" that cooperates with specialized neural systems according to information content.
左下额叶回(LIFG)内的区域同时与句法处理和认知控制有关。试图统一LIFG功能的观点假设,在理解过程中,认知控制解决句子意义不兼容表征之间的冲突。一些研究表明,LIFG内存在句法和非句法冲突解决的共定位活动,这表明具有领域通用性,但其他研究则显示出不重叠的活动,这表明存在领域特定的认知控制和/或对句法有独特反应的区域。然而,我们提出,检查某些对比的排他性激活位点会造成错误的二分法:领域通用和领域特定的神经机制必须协同作用,以促进跨领域的冲突解决。在这里,受试者在进行功能磁共振成像(fMRI)时完成了四项涉及冲突的不同任务——一项句法任务,三项非句法任务。虽然在冲突处理过程中,LIFG在个体内部持续激活,但功能连接分析揭示了与不同脑网络的任务特定协调。因此,LIFG可能作为一个冲突解决“枢纽”,根据信息内容与专门的神经系统合作。