• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本版糖尿病接纳与行动问卷对日本2型糖尿病患者的信效度

The reliability and validity for Japanese type 2 diabetes patients of the Japanese version of the acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire.

作者信息

Saito Junichi, Shoji Wataru, Kumano Hiroaki

机构信息

1Graduate School of Human Science, Waseda University, 2-579-15, Mikajima, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1192 Japan.

2Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Biopsychosoc Med. 2018 Aug 2;12:9. doi: 10.1186/s13030-018-0129-9. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s13030-018-0129-9
PMID:30123316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6090952/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determing which psychological traits of Japanese type 2 diabetes patients would provide reliability and validity to the Japanese version of the Acceptance and Action Diabetes Questionnaire (AADQ-J).

METHODS

Various questionnaires were administered to type 2 diabetes patients who were registered on the database of the research service provider; data from a total of 600 patients (mean ± SD age was 57.50 ± 9.87 years, female 21.83%) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Three items were excluded because of psychometric concerns related to the original 11-item AADQ. Confirmation factor analyses revealed that the eight-item version demonstrated the best indicators of a goodness of fit. The questionnaire showed adequate internal consistency. The questionnaire demonstrated high measurement accuracy in broad trait values by the test information function of Item Response Theory. The questionnaire showed stronger positive correlations with self-care activities and HbA1c than with diabetes distress and depressive mood.

CONCLUSIONS

The eight-item Japanese version of AADQ has reliability and validity for type 2 diabetes patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定日本2型糖尿病患者的哪些心理特质能为日语版糖尿病接纳与行动问卷(AADQ-J)提供信效度。

方法

对登记在研究服务提供商数据库中的2型糖尿病患者进行了各种问卷调查;共分析了600例患者的数据(平均年龄±标准差为57.50±9.87岁,女性占21.83%)。

结果

由于与原11项AADQ相关的心理测量学问题,排除了3个项目。验证性因素分析表明,8项版本显示出最佳的拟合优度指标。该问卷显示出足够的内部一致性。通过项目反应理论的测试信息函数,该问卷在广泛的特质值上显示出较高的测量准确性。该问卷与自我护理活动和糖化血红蛋白的正相关性强于与糖尿病困扰和抑郁情绪的正相关性。

结论

8项日语版AADQ对2型糖尿病患者具有信效度。

相似文献

1
The reliability and validity for Japanese type 2 diabetes patients of the Japanese version of the acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire.日本版糖尿病接纳与行动问卷对日本2型糖尿病患者的信效度
Biopsychosoc Med. 2018 Aug 2;12:9. doi: 10.1186/s13030-018-0129-9. eCollection 2018.
2
Psychometric properties of the Persian versions of acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire (AADQ) and the diabetes acceptance and action scale (DAAS), in Iranian youth with type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病伊朗青少年中波斯语版接受与行动糖尿病问卷(AADQ)和糖尿病接受与行动量表(DAAS)的心理测量特性。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021 Apr 12;20(1):655-663. doi: 10.1007/s40200-021-00796-1. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Psychometric Evaluation of the Swedish Acceptance and Action Diabetes Questionnaire: A Rasch Analysis.《瑞典接受与行动糖尿病问卷的心理测量评估:Rasch 分析》。
J Nurs Meas. 2024 Jun 19;32(2):227-240. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2022-0071.
4
Measuring psychological flexibility in youth with type 1 diabetes.测量 1 型糖尿病青少年的心理灵活性。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 Dec;21(8):1566-1574. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13110. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
5
Validity and reliability of a Malay version of the brief illness perception questionnaire for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病患者简短疾病认知问卷马来语版本的效度和信度
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 3;17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0394-5.
6
Japanese version of the 42-item psychological well-being scale (PWBS-42): a validation study.42 项心理幸福感量表(PWBS-42)的日文版:验证研究。
BMC Psychol. 2020 Jul 20;8(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00441-1.
7
[Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the coping inventory for stressful situations (CISS): a contribution to the cross-cultural studies of coping].压力情境应对量表(CISS)日文版的信效度:对应对方式跨文化研究的贡献
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1993;95(8):602-20.
8
Preparation, Reliability, and Validity of a Japanese Version of the "Satisfaction of Treatment among Caregivers of Dependent Type 2 Diabetic Patients" Questionnaire.一种用于评估 2 型糖尿病依赖型患者照顾者治疗满意度的问卷的日文版的编制、信度和效度。
J Diabetes Res. 2020 Jun 15;2020:4960130. doi: 10.1155/2020/4960130. eCollection 2020.
9
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Recovery Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ) among mental health providers: a questionnaire survey.心理健康服务提供者中《康复态度问卷》(RAQ)日语版的心理测量学特性:一项问卷调查
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 16;16:32. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0740-x.
10
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of the Relationship Between Psychological (In)flexibility and Living with and Managing Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.心理(不)灵活性与1型和2型糖尿病患者的生活及管理之间关系的范围综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;15(6):792. doi: 10.3390/bs15060792.
2
The patterns of acceptance, mindfulness, and values for Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a web-based survey.日本2型糖尿病患者的接纳、正念和价值观模式:一项基于网络的调查。
Biopsychosoc Med. 2022 Mar 7;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13030-022-00236-3.
3
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Stigma (AAQ-S-K).韩国版接纳与行动问卷-耻辱感量表(AAQ-S-K)的效度与信度
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;9(10):1355. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101355.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the sources of diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes.了解1型糖尿病成年患者的糖尿病困扰来源。
J Diabetes Complications. 2015 May-Jun;29(4):572-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
2
Assessment of diabetes acceptance can help identify patients with ineffective diabetes self-care and poor diabetes control.评估糖尿病接受度有助于识别糖尿病自我管理效果不佳和血糖控制较差的患者。
Diabet Med. 2014 Nov;31(11):1446-51. doi: 10.1111/dme.12553. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
3
A brief psychological intervention to improve adherence in type 2 diabetes.简短心理干预提高 2 型糖尿病患者的遵医行为
Diabetes Metab. 2013 Oct;39(5):432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
4
Prospective associations between emotional distress and poor outcomes in type 2 diabetes.情绪困扰与 2 型糖尿病不良结局的前瞻性关联。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):2472-8. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0181. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
5
Psychosocial factors and diabetes mellitus: evidence-based treatment guidelines.
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2005 Aug;1(3):255-70. doi: 10.2174/157339905774574329.
6
Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: a randomized controlled trial.通过接纳、正念和价值观改善糖尿病自我管理:一项随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Apr;75(2):336-43. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.336.
7
The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2型糖尿病成人患者中合并抑郁症的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabet Med. 2006 Nov;23(11):1165-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01943.x.
8
Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control.2型糖尿病成人患者的自我管理教育:对血糖控制影响的荟萃分析
Diabetes Care. 2002 Jul;25(7):1159-71. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159.
9
The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale.糖尿病自我护理活动量表总结:7项研究结果及修订版量表
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):943-50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943.
10
Assessment of diabetes-related distress.糖尿病相关困扰的评估。
Diabetes Care. 1995 Jun;18(6):754-60. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.6.754.