Ruhle Brian C, Ferguson Bryan Ava, Grogan Raymon H
1 Section of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
2 Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, Texas.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):129-135. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0308. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
Over the last few decades, robotic surgery with the da Vinci system has become increasingly prevalent. Endocrine surgeons are witnessing a rapid growth in enthusiasm for robotic approaches for treating thyroid, parathyroid, and adrenal disease. For carefully selected patients, the robotic system may be the preferred technique, although its use remains controversial and indications are in evolution. The goal of this article is to review current robotic procedures for thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, and adrenalectomy, and scrutinize the existing literature for application of these approaches.
We systematically searched and reviewed relevant articles on PubMed and MEDLINE databases for robotic or robot-assisted thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, or adrenalectomy.
The safety and feasibility for robotic thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, and adrenalectomy have been repeatedly demonstrated. Although robotic thyroid and parathyroid surgery offers better cosmetic results compared to the conventional open operation, remote-access techniques introduce new risks. Similar outcomes have been reported for laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy, but robot-assisted techniques may extend the capabilities of minimally invasive surgery, particularly performing subtotal adrenalectomy.
While robotic procedures offer better ergonomics for the endocrine surgeon and improved cosmesis for the patient, the major drawback to the robot system almost universally is the higher cost. With new robotically assisted surgical devices on the way that could drive down costs and speed up innovation, the indications for robotic endocrine surgery may greatly expand.
在过去几十年中,使用达芬奇系统的机器人手术越来越普遍。内分泌外科医生对采用机器人技术治疗甲状腺、甲状旁腺和肾上腺疾病的热情迅速高涨。对于经过精心挑选的患者,机器人系统可能是首选技术,尽管其应用仍存在争议且适应证也在不断演变。本文的目的是回顾当前甲状腺切除术、甲状旁腺切除术和肾上腺切除术的机器人手术方法,并仔细研究这些方法应用的现有文献。
我们系统地检索并回顾了PubMed和MEDLINE数据库中有关机器人或机器人辅助甲状腺切除术、甲状旁腺切除术或肾上腺切除术的相关文章。
机器人甲状腺切除术、甲状旁腺切除术和肾上腺切除术的安全性和可行性已得到反复证实。尽管与传统开放手术相比,机器人甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术具有更好的美容效果,但远程接入技术带来了新的风险。腹腔镜和机器人肾上腺切除术的结果相似,但机器人辅助技术可能会扩展微创手术的能力,特别是进行肾上腺次全切除术。
虽然机器人手术为内分泌外科医生提供了更好的人体工程学设计,并为患者改善了美容效果,但机器人系统几乎普遍存在的主要缺点是成本较高。随着新型机器人辅助手术设备的出现,有望降低成本并加速创新,机器人内分泌手术的适应证可能会大幅扩展。