Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0201710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201710. eCollection 2018.
Snowball sampling is a commonly employed sampling method in qualitative research; however, the diversity of samples generated via this method has repeatedly been questioned. Scholars have posited several anecdotally based recommendations for enhancing the diversity of snowball samples. In this study, we performed the first quantitative, medium-N analysis of snowball sampling to identify pathways to sample diversity, analysing 211 reach-outs conducted via snowball sampling, resulting in 81 interviews; these interviews were administered between April and August 2015 for a research project on anti-dam movements in Southeast Asia. Based upon this analysis, we were able to refine and enhance the previous recommendations (e.g., showcasing novel evidence on the value of multiple seeds or face-to-face interviews). This paper may thus be of particular interest to scholars employing or intending to employ snowball sampling.
雪球抽样是定性研究中常用的抽样方法;然而,这种方法产生的样本多样性却屡遭质疑。学者们基于一些传闻提出了一些增强雪球样本多样性的建议。在这项研究中,我们对雪球抽样进行了首次定量的中等 N 分析,以确定通向样本多样性的途径,分析了通过雪球抽样进行的 211 次联系,共产生了 81 次访谈;这些访谈于 2015 年 4 月至 8 月期间进行,是关于东南亚反坝运动的研究项目。基于这一分析,我们能够对之前的建议进行改进和加强(例如,展示多个种子或面对面访谈的价值的新证据)。因此,本文可能对使用或打算使用雪球抽样的学者特别感兴趣。