Department of Endodontology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Universita degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Faculty of Dental Surgery, IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
J Endod. 2018 Oct;44(10):1480-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
The aim of the study was to determine long-term tooth survival after endodontic retreatment and whether the presence of intraradicular posts influences the outcome.
Ninety-five teeth were randomly assigned to surgical or nonsurgical endodontic retreatment. Forty-seven teeth in 45 patients were treated by conventional endodontic surgery and 48 teeth (47 patients) by nonsurgical retreatment, including the removal of intraradicular posts in 37 (77%). The outcome was tooth survival; follow-up continued until the tooth had been extracted, at least 10 years had elapsed since retreatment, the patient declined further follow-up, or the patient died. The Fisher exact test was used to analyze differences between the groups.
The median follow-up time was 10.1 years (range, 0.0-15.6 years). The overall survival rate was 76%, with no significant differences in long-term tooth survival between retreatment methods or the presence of an intraradicular post. The reasons for tooth extraction were related to the retreatment method. Vertical root fractures were significantly more frequent in the nonsurgical group when retreatment included post removal (P = .036).
There was no significant difference in long-term tooth survival after surgical or nonsurgical retreatment. The presence of intraradicular posts did not affect long-term tooth survival, but for teeth with posts, those retreated nonsurgically were more frequently extracted because of vertical root fractures than those retreated surgically (P = .036). The major limitations of the study were a smaller sample size and the use of outmoded retreatment techniques.
本研究旨在确定根管再治疗后的长期牙齿存活率,以及是否存在根管内桩对治疗结果的影响。
95 颗牙齿被随机分为手术或非手术根管再治疗组。45 名患者中的 47 颗牙齿接受了常规根管手术治疗,48 颗牙齿(47 名患者)接受了非手术再治疗,其中 37 颗(77%)牙齿去除了根管内桩。治疗结果为牙齿存活率;随访持续至牙齿被拔出、再治疗后至少 10 年、患者拒绝进一步随访或患者死亡。采用 Fisher 确切概率法分析组间差异。
中位随访时间为 10.1 年(范围 0.0-15.6 年)。总体存活率为 76%,两种再治疗方法或是否存在根管内桩对长期牙齿存活率无显著差异。拔牙原因与再治疗方法有关。当再治疗包括去除桩时,非手术组的垂直根折发生率明显更高(P =.036)。
手术和非手术再治疗后的长期牙齿存活率无显著差异。根管内桩的存在并不影响长期牙齿存活率,但对于有桩的牙齿,与手术再治疗相比,非手术再治疗后因垂直根折而被更多地拔除(P =.036)。本研究的主要局限性是样本量较小且使用了过时的再治疗技术。