Kalayci Hakan, Yilmaz Baran Şafak, Doğan Durdağ Gülşen, Yetkinel Selçuk, Alemdaroğlu Songül, Özdoğan Serdinç, Yüksel Şimşek Seda, Bulgan Kiliçdağ Esra
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Apr;33(7):1134-1139. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1517152. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
The pulsatility index velocity (DV PIV) has become a popular ultrasonographic measurement during the first trimester of pregnancy. The value of the DV PIV has been the topic of ongoing discussion in the literature, and its reference value in the normal population has not yet been established. Therefore, we aimed to determine a reference value for the DV PIV. We retrospectively evaluated our records of first-trimester ultrasonography performed between 2016 and 2017. Our inclusion criteria were as follows: singleton pregnancy; crown-rump length (CRL) between 45 and 84 mm; absence of structural abnormalities on the ultrasound examination; and absence of chromosomal abnormalities. Records of 820 patients were evaluated. According to the inclusion criteria, records of 458 patients were included in this study. All ultrasound examinations were performed by a single operator with the Voluson E8 (5- to 8-MHz 3 D transducer; General Electric Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) via the transabdominal route. Gestational weeks were designated according to CRL measurements at the beginning of the examination. Nuchal translucency (NT), nasal bone visualization (NB), tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR), "a"-wave pattern, DV PIV, S-wave (peak systolic velocity), D-wave (peak diastolic velocity), a-wave (atrial contraction in late diastole), and time-averaged maximum velocity (TAMXV) measurements were performed. To evaluate the DV Doppler images, a mid-sagittal view of the fetal profile was obtained. Color Doppler and pulse Doppler gate were used in the distal portion of the umbilical sinus, and at least three typical DV waveforms were detected. The SPSS 21.0 statistical program (IBM, Armonk, NY) was used to analyze variables. The mean age, body mass index, CRL, gestational age, and NT values were 30.3 years (range, 18-45), 23.9 kg/m (range, 15.5-46.6), 59.5 mm (range, 45-79), 12.3 weeks (range, 11.2-13.6), and 1.58 mm (range, 0.73-2.62), respectively. The median gravidity and parity were 2 (1-8) and 0 (0-4), respectively. The "a"-wave pattern was identified in all cases, but TR was not detected in any of the cases. Measurements of DV PIV with a Gaussian distribution were suitable according to the Shapiro-Wilk test ( = .252). The mean DV PIV was 0.98, and the fifth and 95th percentiles were 0.73 and 1.22 (±2 SD), respectively. A statistical analysis of our cohort revealed that DV PIV values less than 0.73 and more than 1.22 were beyond the normal range. The mean S-wave, D-wave, a-wave, and TAMXV values were 31.18, 25.64, 8.68, and 22.72 cm/s, respectively. The value of DV PIV measurements is debated in the literature. Using our cohort, we defined the means and ranges of DV PIV. Determining the normal ranges of DV PIV could be helpful to anticipate congenital or chromosomal abnormalities. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the clinical importance of DV PIV, especially for patients with abnormal DV PIV measurements.
搏动指数速度(DV PIV)已成为孕早期一种常用的超声测量指标。DV PIV的值一直是文献中持续讨论的话题,其在正常人群中的参考值尚未确立。因此,我们旨在确定DV PIV的参考值。我们回顾性评估了2016年至2017年间进行的孕早期超声检查记录。我们的纳入标准如下:单胎妊娠;头臀长(CRL)在45至84毫米之间;超声检查未发现结构异常;无染色体异常。对820例患者的记录进行了评估。根据纳入标准,本研究纳入了458例患者的记录。所有超声检查均由一名操作人员使用Voluson E8(5至8兆赫3D探头;通用电气医疗集团,英国小查尔方特)经腹部途径进行。妊娠周数根据检查开始时的CRL测量值确定。进行了颈部透明带(NT)、鼻骨可视化(NB)、三尖瓣反流(TR)、“a”波模式、DV PIV、S波(收缩期峰值速度)、D波(舒张期峰值速度)、a波(舒张末期心房收缩)和时间平均最大速度(TAMXV)测量。为评估DV多普勒图像,获取了胎儿轮廓的正中矢状面视图。在脐窦远端使用彩色多普勒和脉冲多普勒取样容积,检测到至少三个典型的DV波形。使用SPSS 21.0统计软件(IBM,纽约州阿蒙克)分析变量。平均年龄、体重指数、CRL、孕周和NT值分别为30.3岁(范围18至45岁)、23.9千克/米²(范围15.5至46.6)、59.5毫米(范围45至79)、12.3周(范围11.2至13.6)和1.58毫米(范围0.73至2.62)。中位妊娠次数和产次分别为2(1至8)和0(0至4)。所有病例均识别出“a”波模式,但未检测到任何病例有TR。根据Shapiro-Wilk检验(P = 0.252),DV PIV测量值呈高斯分布。平均DV PIV为0.98,第5和第95百分位数分别为0.73和1.22(±2标准差)。对我们队列的统计分析显示,DV PIV值小于0.73和大于1.22超出正常范围。平均S波、D波、a波和TAMXV值分别为31.18、25.64、8.68和22.72厘米/秒。DV PIV测量值在文献中存在争议。利用我们的队列,我们定义了DV PIV的均值和范围。确定DV PIV的正常范围可能有助于预测先天性或染色体异常。需要进一步研究以证明DV PIV的临床重要性,特别是对于DV PIV测量异常的患者。