Suppr超能文献

了解患有多种疾病的患者的常规护理:来自基层医疗中3D干预措施的整群随机试验的基线数据。

Understanding usual care for patients with multimorbidity: baseline data from a cluster-randomised trial of the 3D intervention in primary care.

作者信息

Chaplin Katherine, Bower Peter, Man Mei-See, Brookes Sara T, Gaunt Daisy, Guthrie Bruce, Mann Cindy, Mercer Stewart W, Rafi Imran, Shaw Alison R G, Salisbury Chris

机构信息

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population of Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 29;8(8):e019845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019845.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Recent evidence has highlighted the high prevalence and impact of multimorbidity, but the evidence base for improving management is limited. We have tested a new complex intervention for multimorbidity (the 3D model). The paper describes the baseline characteristics of practices and patients in order to establish the external validity of trial participants. It also explores current 'usual primary care' for multimorbidity, against which the 3D intervention was tested.

DESIGN

Analysis of baseline data from patients in a cluster-randomised controlled trial and additional data from practice staff.

SETTING

Primary care in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with multimorbidity (n=5253) and 154 practice staff.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Using surveys and routinely available data, we compared the characteristics of participating and non-participating practices and participating and non-participating eligible patients.Baseline questionnaire data from patient participants was used to examine participant illness burden, treatment burden and perceptions of receiving patient-centred care. We obtained data about usual care preintervention from practice staff using questionnaires and a structured pro forma.

RESULTS

Participating practices were slightly larger, in less deprived areas, and with slightly higher scores for patient satisfaction compared with non-participating practices. Patients with dementia or learning difficulties were likely to be excluded by their general practitioners, but comparison of participants with non-participants identified only minor differences in characteristics, suggesting that the sample was otherwise representative. Patients reported substantial illness burden, and an important minority reported high treatment burden. Although patients reported relatively high levels of satisfaction with care, many reported not having received potentially important components of care.

CONCLUSION

This trial achieved good levels of external validity. Although patients were generally satisfied with primary care services, there was significant room for improvement in important aspects of care for multimorbidity that are targeted by the 3D intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN06180958; Post-results.

摘要

目的

近期证据凸显了多病共存的高患病率及其影响,但改善管理的证据基础有限。我们对一种针对多病共存的新型综合干预措施(3D模型)进行了测试。本文描述了医疗机构及患者的基线特征,以确定试验参与者的外部效度。同时还探讨了针对多病共存的当前“常规初级医疗”情况,以此作为测试3D干预措施的对照。

设计

对一项整群随机对照试验中患者的基线数据以及来自医疗机构工作人员的额外数据进行分析。

背景

英国的初级医疗。

参与者

患有多病共存的患者(n = 5253)以及154名医疗机构工作人员。

主要和次要结局指标

通过调查及常规可得数据,我们比较了参与和未参与试验的医疗机构以及参与和未参与试验的符合条件患者的特征。患者参与者的基线问卷数据用于检查参与者的疾病负担、治疗负担以及对接受以患者为中心的护理的看法。我们通过问卷和结构化表格从医疗机构工作人员处获取干预前常规护理的数据。

结果

与未参与试验的医疗机构相比,参与试验的医疗机构规模稍大,位于较不贫困地区,患者满意度得分略高。患有痴呆或学习困难的患者可能会被其全科医生排除在外,但参与组与非参与组患者特征的比较仅发现了细微差异,这表明该样本在其他方面具有代表性。患者报告了较重的疾病负担,相当一部分患者报告了较高的治疗负担。尽管患者对护理的满意度相对较高,但许多患者表示未接受一些可能重要的护理内容。

结论

该试验具有较高的外部效度。尽管患者总体上对初级医疗服务感到满意,但在3D干预措施所针对的多病共存护理的重要方面仍有显著的改进空间。

试验注册号

ISRCTN06180958;结果公布后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab8a/6119425/83b011424cc3/bmjopen-2017-019845f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验