Rosbach Michael, Andersen John Sahl
The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 23;12(6):e0179916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179916. eCollection 2017.
To synthesize existing qualitative literature on patient-experienced burden of treatment in multimorbid patients.
A literature search identified available qualitative studies on the topic of burden of treatment in multimorbidity and meta-ethnography was applied as method. The authors' original findings were preserved, but also synthesized to new interpretations to investigate the concept of the burden of treatment using the Cumulative Complexity Model.
Nine qualitative studies were identified. The majority of the 1367 participants from 34 different countries were multimorbid. The treatment burden components, experienced by patients, were identified for each study. The components financial burden, lack of knowledge, diet and exercise, medication burden and frequent healthcare reminding patients of their health problem were found to attract additional attention from the multimorbid patients. In studies conducted in the US and Australia the financial burden and the time and travel burden were found most straining to patients with deprived socioeconomic status. The burden of treatment was found to be a complex concept consisting of many different components and factors interacting with each other. The size of the burden was associated to the workload of demands (number of conditions, number of medications and health status), the capacity (cognitive, physical and financial resources, educational level, cultural background, age, gender and employment conditions) and the context (structure of healthcare and social support). Patients seem to use strategies such as prioritizing between treatments to diminish the workload and mobilizing and coordinating resources to improve their ability to manage the burden of treatment. They try to routinize and integrate the treatment into their daily lives, which might be a way to maintain the balance between workload and capacity.
Healthcare providers need to increase the focus on minimizing multimorbid patients' burden of treatment. Findings in this review suggest that the weight of the burden needs to be established in the individual patient and components of the burden must be identified.
综合关于多病共存患者经历的治疗负担的现有定性文献。
通过文献检索确定了关于多病共存治疗负担主题的现有定性研究,并采用元民族志方法。保留了作者的原始研究结果,但也综合成新的解释,以使用累积复杂性模型研究治疗负担的概念。
确定了9项定性研究。来自34个不同国家的1367名参与者大多数患有多种疾病。针对每项研究确定了患者经历的治疗负担组成部分。发现经济负担、知识缺乏、饮食和运动、药物负担以及频繁的医疗保健提醒患者自身健康问题等组成部分引起了多病共存患者的额外关注。在美国和澳大利亚进行的研究中,发现经济负担以及时间和交通负担对社会经济地位低下的患者最为困扰。发现治疗负担是一个复杂的概念,由许多不同的相互作用的组成部分和因素构成。负担的大小与需求工作量(疾病数量、药物数量和健康状况)、能力(认知、身体和财务资源、教育水平、文化背景、年龄、性别和就业条件)以及背景(医疗保健结构和社会支持)相关。患者似乎会采用诸如在治疗之间进行优先级排序以减少工作量以及调动和协调资源以提高其管理治疗负担能力等策略。他们试图将治疗常规化并融入日常生活,这可能是维持工作量和能力之间平衡的一种方式。
医疗保健提供者需要更加关注将多病共存患者的治疗负担降至最低。本综述的结果表明,需要确定个体患者负担的轻重,并识别负担的组成部分。