• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项事后汇总分析评估了基础胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者在更宽的夜间窗内使用甘精胰岛素 300 U/mL(Gla-300)和 100 U/mL(Gla-100)时发生低血糖的风险。

A post-hoc pooled analysis to evaluate the risk of hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus 100 U/mL (Gla-100) over wider nocturnal windows in individuals with type 2 diabetes on a basal-only insulin regimen.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Diabetes and Endocrinology Center, Rockwood Clinic, Spokane, Washington.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Feb;21(2):402-407. doi: 10.1111/dom.13515. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1111/dom.13515
PMID:30160030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6586031/
Abstract

The EDITION trials in type 2 diabetes demonstrated comparable glycaemic control with less nocturnal and anytime (24-hour) hypoglycaemia for insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100). However, the predefined nocturnal window (0:00-5:59 AM) may not be the most relevant for clinical practice. This post-hoc analysis compared expansions of the predefined nocturnal interval during basal insulin treatment without prandial insulin. Patient-level, 6-month data, pooled from the EDITION 2 and 3 trials and the EDITION JP 2 trial (N = 1922, basal insulin only) were analysed. Accompanying hypoglycaemia during treatment with Gla-300 was compared to that during treatment with Gla-100, using predefined (0:00-5:59 AM) and expanded (10:00 PM-5:59 AM, 0:00-7:59 AM, 10:00 PM to pre-breakfast SMPG) windows. Confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemic events were reported most frequently between 6:00 AM and 8:00 AM. Windows expanded beyond 6:00 AM included more events than other windows. The percentage of participants with at least one event was lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100 in all windows examined. Expanding the nocturnal interval allows better assessment of the risk of hypoglycaemia associated with basal insulin. The risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was consistently lower with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 using all four windows.

摘要

EDITION 试验在 2 型糖尿病中显示出可比的血糖控制效果,甘精胰岛素 300U/ml(Gla-300)与甘精胰岛素 100U/ml(Gla-100)相比,夜间和任何时间(24 小时)低血糖发生率更低。然而,预设的夜间窗口(0:00-5:59 AM)可能与临床实践不太相关。本事后分析比较了基础胰岛素治疗中预设夜间间隔的扩展,不包括餐前胰岛素。对 EDITION 2 和 3 试验和 EDITION JP 2 试验的患者水平、6 个月数据(N=1922,仅使用基础胰岛素)进行了汇总分析。使用预设的(0:00-5:59 AM)和扩展的(10:00 PM-5:59 AM、0:00-7:59 AM、10:00 PM 至早餐前 SMPG)窗口,比较了 Gla-300 治疗期间与 Gla-100 治疗期间伴随的低血糖。确认(≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL])或严重低血糖事件报告最频繁的时间在 6:00 AM 至 8:00 AM 之间。扩展到 6:00 AM 以外的窗口包括比其他窗口更多的事件。在所有检查的窗口中,使用 Gla-300 的参与者中至少有一次事件的百分比低于使用 Gla-100 的参与者。扩展夜间间隔可以更好地评估与基础胰岛素相关的低血糖风险。使用所有四个窗口,Gla-300 与 Gla-100 相比,夜间低血糖风险始终较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9815/6586031/f270a97b3f1b/DOM-21-402-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9815/6586031/f270a97b3f1b/DOM-21-402-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9815/6586031/f270a97b3f1b/DOM-21-402-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A post-hoc pooled analysis to evaluate the risk of hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus 100 U/mL (Gla-100) over wider nocturnal windows in individuals with type 2 diabetes on a basal-only insulin regimen.一项事后汇总分析评估了基础胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者在更宽的夜间窗内使用甘精胰岛素 300 U/mL(Gla-300)和 100 U/mL(Gla-100)时发生低血糖的风险。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Feb;21(2):402-407. doi: 10.1111/dom.13515. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
2
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 2).在使用基础胰岛素和口服降糖药的日本2型糖尿病患者中,新型甘精胰岛素300 U/ml与甘精胰岛素100 U/ml的比较:一项随机对照试验(EDITION JP 2)中的血糖控制和低血糖情况
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):366-74. doi: 10.1111/dom.12618. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
3
Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL compared with glargine 100 U/mL in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin plus oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs (EDITION JP 2 randomised 12-month trial including 6-month extension).甘精胰岛素 300U/mL 与甘精胰岛素 100U/mL 治疗日本 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和低血糖:使用基础胰岛素加口服降糖药(EDITION JP 2 随机 12 个月试验,包括 6 个月的扩展)。
Diabetes Metab. 2017 Oct;43(5):446-452. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
4
Glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia, and weight change with insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes: A 12-month comparison by concomitant sulphonylurea and/or glinide use.甘精胰岛素 300U/mL 与甘精胰岛素 100U/mL 治疗日本 2 型糖尿病成人患者的血糖控制、低血糖及体重变化:合用磺脲类药物和/或格列奈类药物 12 个月的比较
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Nov;20(11):2541-2550. doi: 10.1111/dom.13414. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 1).在日本1型糖尿病成人患者中,基础胰岛素和餐时胰岛素联用甘精胰岛素300 U/ml与100 U/ml的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验(EDITION JP 1)中的血糖控制和低血糖情况
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):375-83. doi: 10.1111/dom.12619. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia risk with insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus glargine 100 U/mL: A patient-level meta-analysis examining older and younger adults with type 2 diabetes.胰岛素甘精 300U/mL 与甘精 100U/mL 对血糖控制和低血糖风险的影响:一项对老年和年轻 2 型糖尿病患者的患者水平荟萃分析。
Diabetes Metab. 2020 Apr;46(2):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
7
Patient-level meta-analysis of efficacy and hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin glargine 100U/mL or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin analysed according to concomitant oral antidiabetes therapy.根据同时使用的口服抗糖尿病治疗方法,对起始使用100U/mL甘精胰岛素或中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素的2型糖尿病患者的疗效和低血糖情况进行患者水平的荟萃分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Feb;124:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION 1, 2 and 3 studies: glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes.1、2、3期研究的患者水平荟萃分析:2型糖尿病患者中,新型300 U/ml甘精胰岛素与100 U/ml甘精胰岛素的血糖控制及低血糖情况对比
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Sep;17(9):859-67. doi: 10.1111/dom.12485. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
9
One-year sustained glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using basal plus meal-time insulin: the EDITION 1 12-month randomized trial, including 6-month extension.与100 U/ml的甘精胰岛素相比,使用300 U/ml的新型甘精胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者进行基础加餐时胰岛素治疗,可实现一年的持续血糖控制且低血糖发生率更低:EDITION 1 12个月随机试验,包括6个月延长期。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Sep;17(9):835-42. doi: 10.1111/dom.12472. Epub 2015 May 11.
10
Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes switching from twice-daily basal insulin to once-daily insulin glargine 300 U/mL or insulin glargine 100 U/mL (EDITION 1 and EDITION 2 subgroup analysis).2 型糖尿病患者从每日两次基础胰岛素转换为每日一次甘精胰岛素 300U/mL 或甘精胰岛素 100U/mL 时的血糖控制和低血糖(EDITION 1 和 EDITION 2 亚组分析)。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20(2):448-452. doi: 10.1111/dom.13071. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Safety and Efficacy of Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes at Risk of Hypoglycemia and Use in Other Special Populations: A Narrative Review.第二代基础胰岛素类似物在有低血糖风险的2型糖尿病成人患者中的安全性和有效性及其在其他特殊人群中的应用:一项叙述性综述
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Nov;11(11):2555-2593. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00925-8. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
2
Lower risk of severe hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus glargine 100 U/mL in participants with type 1 diabetes: A meta-analysis of 6-month phase 3 clinical trials.甘精胰岛素 300U/ml 与甘精胰岛素 100U/ml 相比,用于 1 型糖尿病患者时低血糖风险更低:6 个月 3 期临床试验的荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Oct;22(10):1880-1885. doi: 10.1111/dom.14109. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus 100 Units/mL in Older People With Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the SENIOR Study.一项比较甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与 100 单位/毫升在老年 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验:来自 SENIOR 研究的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1672-1680. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0168. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia, and weight change with insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes: A 12-month comparison by concomitant sulphonylurea and/or glinide use.甘精胰岛素 300U/mL 与甘精胰岛素 100U/mL 治疗日本 2 型糖尿病成人患者的血糖控制、低血糖及体重变化:合用磺脲类药物和/或格列奈类药物 12 个月的比较
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Nov;20(11):2541-2550. doi: 10.1111/dom.13414. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
3
Rationale and methodology for a European pooled analysis of postmarketing interventional and observational studies of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in diabetes: protocol of REALI project.胰岛素甘精 300U/ml 用于糖尿病的上市后干预性和观察性研究的欧洲联合分析的原理和方法:REALI 项目方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 28;10(4):e033659. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033659.
Assessment of hypoglycaemia during basal insulin therapy: Temporal distribution and risk of events using a predefined or an expanded definition of nocturnal events.基础胰岛素治疗期间低血糖评估:使用预设或扩展的夜间事件定义的时间分布和事件风险。
Diabetes Metab. 2018 Sep;44(4):333-340. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
4
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 2).在使用基础胰岛素和口服降糖药的日本2型糖尿病患者中,新型甘精胰岛素300 U/ml与甘精胰岛素100 U/ml的比较:一项随机对照试验(EDITION JP 2)中的血糖控制和低血糖情况
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):366-74. doi: 10.1111/dom.12618. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
5
The past, present, and future of basal insulins.基础胰岛素的过去、现在和未来。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Sep;32(6):478-96. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2763. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
6
A meta-analysis of rate ratios for nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine using different definitions for hypoglycaemia.使用不同低血糖定义,对德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素夜间确诊低血糖率比的荟萃分析。
Diabet Med. 2016 Apr;33(4):478-87. doi: 10.1111/dme.13002. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
7
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3).在接受口服降糖药物治疗的初治2型糖尿病患者中,新型300U/ml甘精胰岛素与100U/ml甘精胰岛素的比较:一项随机对照试验(第3版)
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Apr;17(4):386-94. doi: 10.1111/dom.12438. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
8
New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2).德谷胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升治疗口服降糖药和基础胰岛素控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项 6 个月随机对照研究(EDITION 2)
Diabetes Care. 2014 Dec;37(12):3235-43. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0990. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
9
New insulin glargine 300 Units · mL-1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 Units · mL-1.新的甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升相比,具有更平稳的作用谱和更持久的血糖控制。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr;38(4):637-43. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0006. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
10
New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1).在使用基础胰岛素和餐时胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者中,新的甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升的比较:6 个月随机对照试验中的血糖控制和低血糖(EDITION 1)。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Oct;37(10):2755-62. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0991. Epub 2014 Jul 30.