• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Visual Cancer Communication on Social Media: An Examination of Content and Effects of #Melanomasucks.社交媒体上的视觉癌症传播:对#黑色素瘤糟透了#的内容与影响的考察
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 5;20(9):e10501. doi: 10.2196/10501.
2
Factors Engaging Users of Diabetes Social Media Channels on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram: Observational Study.社交媒体在糖尿病管理中的应用:基于 Facebook、Twitter 和 Instagram 的用户参与因素观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e21204. doi: 10.2196/21204.
3
Characteristics of and User Engagement With Antivaping Posts on Instagram: Observational Study.Instagram 反电子烟帖子的特点和用户参与度:观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 25;7(11):e29600. doi: 10.2196/29600.
4
Characterizing Anti-Vaping Posts for Effective Communication on Instagram Using Multimodal Deep Learning.利用多模态深度学习技术对 Instagram 上反电子烟内容进行特征分析以实现有效沟通。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Feb 15;26(Supplement_1):S43-S48. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad189.
5
Eliciting Emotion and Action Increases Social Media Engagement: An Analysis of Influential Orthopaedic Surgeons.引发情感和行动可提高社交媒体参与度:对有影响力的骨科医生的分析
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Jul 21;3(5):e1301-e1308. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.05.011. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Examining Hashtag Use of #blackboyjoy and #theblackmancan and Related Content on Instagram: Descriptive Content Analysis.探究Instagram上#黑人男孩的快乐#和#黑人男子能成功#主题标签的使用情况及相关内容:描述性内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 1;6(8):e34044. doi: 10.2196/34044.
7
Grappling With the COVID-19 Health Crisis: Content Analysis of Communication Strategies and Their Effects on Public Engagement on Social Media.应对新冠疫情健康危机:社交媒体上传播策略及其对公众参与度影响的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(8):e21360. doi: 10.2196/21360.
8
Examining the Influence on Perceptions of Endometriosis via Analysis of Social Media Posts: Cross-sectional Study.通过社交媒体帖子分析探讨对子宫内膜异位症认知的影响:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 18;6(3):e31135. doi: 10.2196/31135.
9
Acquisition of Social Support and Linguistic Characteristics of Social Media Posts About Young Adult Cancer.获取社会支持和社交媒体帖子中关于青年癌症的语言特征。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018 Apr;7(2):196-203. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0076. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
Health Warnings on Instagram Advertisements for Synthetic Nicotine E-Cigarettes and Engagement.Instagram 广告中对合成尼古丁电子烟的健康警示和参与度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2434434. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34434.

引用本文的文献

1
Visualizing cancer and survivorship with generative AI?-an exploration of breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancer imagery.用生成式人工智能可视化癌症与癌症 survivorship?——对乳腺癌、前列腺癌和胰腺癌图像的探索
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01843-z.
2
Patient considerations of social media account management after death.患者对死后社交媒体账户管理的考虑。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Oct 1;32(10):696. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08882-9.
3
Contemporary visualities of ill health: On the social (media) construction of disease regimes.当代不健康的视觉形象:论疾病模式的社会(媒体)建构
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Jan;47(1):e13846. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13846. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
4
Assessing the needs of patients with breast cancer and their families across various treatment phases using a Latent Dirichlet Allocation model: a text-mining approach to online health communities.使用潜在狄利克雷分配模型评估乳腺癌患者及其家庭在不同治疗阶段的需求:一种在线健康社区的文本挖掘方法。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Apr 29;32(5):314. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08513-3.
5
The New Media Landscape and Its Effects on Skin Cancer Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Prevention: Scoping Review.新媒体格局及其对皮肤癌诊断、预后和预防的影响:范围综述
JMIR Dermatol. 2024 Apr 8;7:e53373. doi: 10.2196/53373.
6
How does social media use influence the mental health of pancreatic cancer patients: a chain mediating effect of online social support and psychological resilience.社交媒体使用如何影响胰腺癌患者的心理健康:在线社会支持和心理弹性的链式中介效应。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 27;11:1166776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166776. eCollection 2023.
7
Supporting Vaccination on TikTok During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Vaccine Beliefs, Emotions, and Comments.在新冠疫情期间TikTok上对疫苗接种的支持:疫苗信念、情绪及评论
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 7;13:938377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938377. eCollection 2022.
8
Patient-Generated Health Photos and Videos Across Health and Well-being Contexts: Scoping Review.患者生成的健康照片和视频在健康和健康相关领域的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 12;24(4):e28867. doi: 10.2196/28867.
9
A Thin Line Between Helpful and Harmful Internet Usage: Embodied Research on Internet Experiences Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients.有益和有害网络使用之间的一线之隔:青少年和青年癌症患者互联网体验的体现研究。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2022 Oct;11(5):478-485. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0113. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
10
Characterising experiences with acute myeloid leukaemia using an Instagram content analysis.使用 Instagram 内容分析来描述急性髓细胞白血病的体验。
PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250641. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Vaccine Images on Twitter: Analysis of What Images are Shared.推特上的疫苗图片:对所分享图片的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 3;20(4):e130. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8221.
2
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
3
Daily diary study of hope, stigma, and functioning in lung cancer patients.肺癌患者希望、污名和功能的日常日记研究。
Health Psychol. 2018 Mar;37(3):218-227. doi: 10.1037/hea0000570. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
4
The common sense model of self-regulation: Meta-analysis and test of a process model.自我调节的常识模型:过程模型的元分析与检验。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Nov;143(11):1117-1154. doi: 10.1037/bul0000118. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
5
One in two cancer patients is significantly distressed: Prevalence and indicators of distress.每两个癌症患者中就有一个患者受到显著困扰:困扰的患病率和指标。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):75-82. doi: 10.1002/pon.4464. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
6
YouTube Videos Related to Skin Cancer: A Missed Opportunity for Cancer Prevention and Control.与皮肤癌相关的YouTube视频:癌症预防与控制的一个错失的机会。
JMIR Cancer. 2015 Mar 2;1(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/cancer.4204.
7
Understanding Health Care Social Media Use From Different Stakeholder Perspectives: A Content Analysis of an Online Health Community.从不同利益相关者视角理解医疗保健领域社交媒体的使用:对一个在线健康社区的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 7;19(4):e109. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7087.
8
Who are happy survivors? Physical, psychosocial, and spiritual factors associated with happiness of breast cancer survivors during the transition from cancer patient to survivor.哪些是快乐的幸存者?与乳腺癌患者向幸存者过渡期间的幸福感相关的生理、心理社会和精神因素。
Psychooncology. 2017 Nov;26(11):1922-1928. doi: 10.1002/pon.4408. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
If I don't laugh, I'll cry: Exploring humor coping in breast cancer.如果我不笑,我就会哭:探索乳腺癌患者的幽默应对方式。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2016 Nov-Dec;34(6):530-541. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1233926. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
10
The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management.自我调节常识模型(CSM):理解疾病自我管理的动态框架。
J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):935-946. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

社交媒体上的视觉癌症传播:对#黑色素瘤糟透了#的内容与影响的考察

Visual Cancer Communication on Social Media: An Examination of Content and Effects of #Melanomasucks.

作者信息

Cho Hyunyi, Silver Nathan, Na Kilhoe, Adams Dinah, Luong Kate T, Song Chi

机构信息

School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Futurety LLC, Columbus, OH, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 5;20(9):e10501. doi: 10.2196/10501.

DOI:10.2196/10501
PMID:30185403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6231808/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Instagram is increasingly becoming a platform on which visual communication of cancer takes place, but few studies have investigated the content and effects. In particular, a paucity of research has evaluated the effects of visual communication of cancer on participative engagement outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to investigate cancer-related beliefs and emotions shared on Instagram and to examine their effects on participative engagement outcomes including likes, comments, and social support.

METHODS

This study analyzed the content of 441 posts of #melanomasucks on Instagram and assessed the effects of the content characteristics on outcomes, including the number of likes and comments and types of social support using group least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression.

RESULTS

Posts about controlling melanoma were most frequent (271/441, 61.5%), followed by 240 (54.4%) posts about outcomes of having melanoma. Ninety posts (20.4%) were about the causes of melanoma. A greater number of posts expressed positive (159/441, 36.1%) than negative emotions (100/441, 22.7%). Eighty posts (18.1%) expressed hope, making it the most frequently expressed emotion; 49 posts expressed fear (11.1%), 46 were humorous (10.4%), and 46 showed sadness (10.4%). Posts about self behavior as a cause of melanoma decreased likes (P<.001) and social support comments (P=.048). Posts about physical consequences of melanoma decreased likes (P=.02) but increased comments (P<.001) and emotional social support (P<.001); posts about melanoma treatment experience increased comments (P=.03) and emotional social support (P<.001). None of the expressions of positive emotions increased likes, comments, or social support. Expression of anger increased the number of likes (P<.001) but those about fear (P<.001) and joy (P=.006) decreased the number of likes. Posts about fear (P=.003) and sadness (P=.003) increased emotional social support. Posts showing images of melanoma or its treatment on the face or body parts made up 21.8% (96/441) of total posts. Inclusion of images increased the number of comments (P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first investigation of the content and effects of user-generated visual cancer communication on social media. The findings show where the self-expressive and social engagement functions of #melanomasucks converge and diverge, providing implications for extending research on the commonsense model of illness and for developing conceptual frameworks explaining participative engagement on social media.

摘要

背景

照片墙(Instagram)日益成为癌症视觉传播的平台,但很少有研究调查其内容及影响。尤其是,鲜有研究评估癌症视觉传播对参与性参与结果的影响。

目的

我们研究的目的是调查在照片墙上分享的与癌症相关的信念和情绪,并检验它们对包括点赞、评论和社会支持在内的参与性参与结果的影响。

方法

本研究分析了照片墙上#黑色素瘤糟透了#的441条帖子的内容,并使用组套索逻辑回归评估内容特征对结果的影响,包括点赞和评论的数量以及社会支持的类型。

结果

关于控制黑色素瘤的帖子最为常见(271/441,61.5%),其次是关于患黑色素瘤结果的240条(54.4%)帖子。90条(20.4%)帖子是关于黑色素瘤的病因。表达积极情绪的帖子数量(159/441,36.1%)多于消极情绪的帖子(100/441,22.7%)。80条(18.1%)帖子表达了希望,使其成为最常表达的情绪;49条帖子表达了恐惧(11.1%),46条具有幽默性(10.4%),46条表现出悲伤(10.4%)。将自身行为作为黑色素瘤病因的帖子减少了点赞数(P<0.001)和社会支持评论数(P=0.048)。关于黑色素瘤身体后果的帖子减少了点赞数(P=0.02),但增加了评论数(P<0.001)和情感社会支持(P<0.001);关于黑色素瘤治疗经历的帖子增加了评论数(P=0.03)和情感社会支持(P<0.001)。积极情绪的表达均未增加点赞、评论或社会支持。愤怒情绪的表达增加了点赞数(P<0.001),但恐惧(P<0.001)和喜悦(P=0.006)情绪的表达减少了点赞数。关于恐惧(P=0.003)和悲伤(P=0.003)情绪的帖子增加了情感社会支持。展示面部或身体部位黑色素瘤或其治疗图像的帖子占总帖子数的21.8%(96/441)。包含图像增加了评论数(P=0.001)。

结论

据我们所知,这是首次对用户生成的癌症视觉传播在社交媒体上的内容及影响进行的调查。研究结果表明了#黑色素瘤糟透了#的自我表达和社会参与功能的异同,为拓展疾病常识模型的研究以及开发解释社交媒体上参与性参与的概念框架提供了启示。