Patiño Luz H, Camargo Milena, Muñoz Marina, Ríos-Chaparro Dora I, Patarroyo Manuel A, Ramírez Juan D
Grupo de Investigaciones Microbiológicas-UR (GIMUR), Programa de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ph.D. Programme in Biomedical and Biological Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Front Microbiol. 2018 Aug 22;9:1854. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01854. eCollection 2018.
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has become a useful tool for studying the genetic diversity of important public health pathogens, such as (). Four MLST schemes have been proposed for (data available from Chlamydiales MLST databases). However, the lack of a sole standardized scheme represents the greatest limitation regarding typing this species. This study was thus aimed at evaluating the usefulness of the four MLST schemes available for , describing each molecular marker's pattern and its contribution toward a description of intra-specific genetic diversity and population structure. The markers for each scheme, showed a variable power of dicrimination, exhibiting in some cases over estimation in the determination of Sequence Types (STs). However, individual analysis of each locus's typing efficiency and discrimination power led to identifying 8 markers as having a suitable pattern for intra-specific typing. analyzing the 8 candidate markers gave a combination of 3 of these loci as an optimal scheme for identifying a large amount of STs, maximizing discrimination power whilst maintaining suitable typing efficiency. One scheme was compared against core genome phylogenies, finding a higher typing resolution through the last approach. These results confirm once again that although complete genome data, in particular from core genome MLST (cgMLST) allow a high resolution clustering for isolates. There are combinations of molecular markers that could generate equivalent results, with the advantage of representing an easy implementation strategy and lower costs leading to contribute to the monitoring and molecular epidemiology of .
多位点序列分型(MLST)已成为研究重要公共卫生病原体(如[])遗传多样性的有用工具。针对[]已提出了四种MLST方案(可从衣原体MLST数据库获取数据)。然而,缺乏单一的标准化方案是对该物种进行分型的最大限制。因此,本研究旨在评估现有的四种针对[]的MLST方案的实用性,描述每个分子标记的模式及其对种内遗传多样性和种群结构描述的贡献。每个方案的标记显示出不同的鉴别力,在某些情况下,在序列类型(STs)的确定中表现出过高估计。然而,对每个基因座的分型效率和鉴别力进行单独分析后,确定了8个标记具有适合种内分型的模式。对这8个候选标记进行分析后,将其中3个基因座的组合作为识别大量STs的最佳方案,在保持适当分型效率的同时最大化鉴别力。将一种方案与核心基因组系统发育进行比较,发现通过后一种方法具有更高的分型分辨率。这些结果再次证实,尽管完整的基因组数据,特别是来自核心基因组MLST(cgMLST)的数据允许对[]分离株进行高分辨率聚类。但存在一些分子标记组合可以产生等效结果,其优点是代表一种易于实施的策略且成本较低,有助于对[]进行监测和分子流行病学研究。