Han Hae-Ra, Hong Hyejeong, Starbird Laura E, Ge Song, Ford Athena D, Renda Susan, Sanchez Michael, Stewart Jennifer
School of Nursing, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Center for Cardiovascular and Chronic Care, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Sep 10;4(3):e64. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.9687.
In the era of eHealth, eHealth literacy is emerging as a key concept to promote self-management of chronic conditions such as HIV. However, there is a paucity of research focused on eHealth literacy for people living with HIV (PLWH) as a means of improving their adherence to HIV care and health outcome.
The objective of this study was to critically appraise the types, scope, and nature of studies addressing eHealth literacy as a study variable in PLWH.
This systematic review used comprehensive database searches, such as PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane, to identify quantitative studies targeting PLWH published in English before May 2017 with eHealth literacy as a study variable.
We identified 56 unique records, and 7 papers met the eligibility criteria. The types of study designs varied (descriptive, n=3; quasi-experimental, n=3; and experimental, n=1) and often involved community-based settings (n=5), with sample sizes ranging from 18 to 895. In regards to instruments used, 3 studies measured eHealth literacy with validated instruments such as the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS); 2 studies used full or short versions of Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults, whereas the remaining 2 studies used study-developed questions. The majority of studies included in the review reported high eHealth literacy among the samples. The associations between eHealth literacy and health outcomes in PLWH were not consistent. In the areas of HIV transmission risk, retention in care, treatment adherence, and virological suppression, the role of eHealth literacy is still not fully understood. Furthermore, the implications for future research are discussed.
Understanding the role of eHealth literacy is an essential step to encourage PLWH to be actively engaged in their health care. Avenues to pursue in the role of eHealth literacy and PLWH should consider the development and use of standardized eHealth literacy definitions and measures.
在电子健康时代,电子健康素养正成为促进诸如艾滋病毒等慢性病自我管理的关键概念。然而,针对艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)的电子健康素养作为改善其艾滋病毒治疗依从性和健康结果的一种手段的研究却很匮乏。
本研究的目的是批判性地评估将电子健康素养作为PLWH研究变量的研究类型、范围和性质。
本系统评价通过全面的数据库检索,如PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、科学网和Cochrane,来识别2017年5月之前以英文发表的将电子健康素养作为研究变量的针对PLWH的定量研究。
我们识别出56条独特记录,7篇论文符合纳入标准。研究设计类型多样(描述性研究,n = 3;准实验性研究,n = 3;实验性研究,n = 1),且通常涉及社区环境(n = 5),样本量从18至895不等。关于所使用的工具,3项研究使用经过验证的工具(如电子健康素养量表(eHEALS))来测量电子健康素养;2项研究使用成人功能性健康素养测试的完整或简短版本,而其余2项研究使用自行开发的问题。纳入综述的大多数研究报告样本中的电子健康素养较高。PLWH中电子健康素养与健康结果之间的关联并不一致。在艾滋病毒传播风险、治疗留存率、治疗依从性和病毒学抑制等领域,电子健康素养的作用仍未完全明确。此外,还讨论了对未来研究的启示。
了解电子健康素养的作用是鼓励PLWH积极参与自身医疗保健的重要一步。在电子健康素养对PLWH的作用方面,未来应考虑制定和使用标准化的电子健康素养定义及测量方法。