• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
That's how "you" do it: Generic you expresses norms during early childhood.“你”是这样做的:泛指的“你”在幼儿期表达规范。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:183-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
Learning the rules of the game: The role of generic "you" and "we" in shaping children's interpretations of norms.学习游戏规则:通用的“你”和“我们”在塑造儿童对规范的理解中的作用。
Child Dev. 2023 Jan;94(1):159-171. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13846. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
3
How Spanish speakers express norms using generic person markers.西班牙语使用者如何使用通用人称代词来表达规范。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 23;12(1):5016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08675-2.
4
Children's descriptive-to-prescriptive tendency replicates (and varies) cross-culturally: Evidence from China.儿童从描述性到规定性的倾向在跨文化中存在重复(且有所不同):来自中国的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:148-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 May 25.
5
The early development of the normative mind.规范性思维的早期发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
6
Young children's inclusion decisions in moral and social-conventional group norm contexts.幼儿在道德和社会习俗群体规范背景下的包容决策。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:19-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
7
Young children conform more to norms than to preferences.年幼的孩子更倾向于遵守规范而非个人偏好。
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0251228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251228. eCollection 2021.
8
Factors affecting young children's use of pronouns as referring expressions.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Dec;43(6):1337-49. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4306.1337.
9
When you've seen one, have you seen them all? Children's memory for general and specific learning episodes.看过一个,就算看过全部了吗?儿童对一般和特定学习情节的记忆。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jun;50(6):1653-1659. doi: 10.1037/a0036130. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
10
Modeling social norms increasingly influences costly sharing in middle childhood.塑造社会规范对童年中期的高成本分享行为的影响日益显著。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jul;171:84-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.014. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The persuasive role of generic-you in online interactions.通用第二人称“你”在网络互动中的说服作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):1347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83440-1.
2
How Spanish speakers express norms using generic person markers.西班牙语使用者如何使用通用人称代词来表达规范。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 23;12(1):5016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08675-2.
3
Children across societies enforce conventional norms but in culturally variable ways.社会中的儿童都在执行传统规范,但方式在文化上存在差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 4;119(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2112521118.
4
Categories convey prescriptive information across domains and development.类别在不同领域和发展阶段传达规范性信息。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Dec;212:105231. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105231. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
5
Analyzing the Perceived Utility of Covid-19 Countermeasures: The Role of Pronominalization, Moral Foundations, Moral Disengagement, Fake News Embracing, and Health Anxiety.分析人们对新冠疫情防控措施的感知效用:指称化、道德基础、道德脱离、接受虚假新闻和健康焦虑的作用。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Oct;125(5):2591-2622. doi: 10.1177/00332941211027829. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
6
The Effects of Obligatory and Preferential Frames on Delay Discounting.强制和偏好框架对延迟折扣的影响。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2020 May 21;36(1):74-86. doi: 10.1007/s40616-020-00127-0. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
The culture of social comparison.社会比较文化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 25;115(39):E9067-E9074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721555115. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
8
How language shapes the cultural inheritance of categories.语言如何塑造范畴的文化传承。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7900-7907. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1621073114. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
How "you" makes meaning.“你”如何产生意义。
Science. 2017 Mar 24;355(6331):1299-1302. doi: 10.1126/science.aaj2014.
2
So It Is, So It Shall Be: Group Regularities License Children's Prescriptive Judgments.既然如此,就该如此:群体规律认可儿童的规范性判断。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):576-600. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12443. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
3
Normality: Part descriptive, part prescriptive.常态:部分是描述性的,部分是规范性的。
Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.024. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
4
Generics license 30-month-olds' inferences about the atypical properties of novel kinds.泛型使30个月大的婴儿能够对新事物的非典型属性进行推理。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Sep;52(9):1353-62. doi: 10.1037/dev0000183. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Why Do People Tend to Infer "Ought" From "Is"? The Role of Biases in Explanation.为什么人们倾向于从“是”推断“应该”?解释中的偏差作用。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Aug;27(8):1109-22. doi: 10.1177/0956797616650875. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
6
Generic language and judgements about category membership: Can generics highlight properties as central?通用语言与关于类别归属的判断:通用词能突出核心属性吗?
Lang Cogn Process. 2009 May;24(4):481-505. doi: 10.1080/01690960802223485.
7
Children's explanations as a window into their intuitive theories of the social world.儿童的解释是洞察其社会世界直觉理论的一扇窗口。
Cogn Sci. 2014 Nov-Dec;38(8):1687-97. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12129. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
8
Individual differences in children's and parents' generic language.儿童与父母类属语言中的个体差异。
Child Dev. 2014 May-Jun;85(3):924-940. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12187. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
9
Why do children overimitate? Normativity is crucial.儿童为什么会过度模仿?规范性至关重要。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Oct;116(2):392-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
10
Dual character concepts and the normative dimension of conceptual representation.双重角色概念与概念表现的规范维度。
Cognition. 2013 May;127(2):242-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

“你”是这样做的:泛指的“你”在幼儿期表达规范。

That's how "you" do it: Generic you expresses norms during early childhood.

作者信息

Orvell Ariana, Kross Ethan, Gelman Susan A

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:183-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.015
PMID:28554739
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5660640/
Abstract

Prior research indicates that children construe norms as general and construe preferences as individual. The current studies tested whether this expectation is built into how children interpret and use language. We focused on the pronoun you, which is ambiguous between a canonical interpretation (referring to the addressee) and a generic interpretation (referring to people in general). In Study 1, children (N=132, ages 3-10years) were asked a series of questions containing "you," referring to either descriptive norms (e.g., "What do you do with bikes?") or preferences (e.g., "What do you like to do with bikes?"). In Study 2, parents conversed with their children (N=28, ages 2-4years) about prescriptive norms (e.g., "What should you do with books?") and preferences (e.g., "What do you like about books?"). In both studies, children's choice of pronoun in their answer revealed whether they interpreted you in the questions as generic or canonical. Results indicated that children more often interpreted you as generic in the normative contexts (i.e., responded with generic you, e.g., "You read them") and as canonical in the preference contexts (i.e., responded with I, e.g., "I read them"). This pattern emerged by early preschool, providing the first evidence that the distinction between norms and preferences directs young children's interpretation and use of everyday language.

摘要

先前的研究表明,儿童将规范理解为普遍的,将偏好理解为个人的。当前的研究测试了这种预期是否融入到儿童对语言的解释和使用方式中。我们聚焦于代词“你”,它在标准解释(指代听话者)和泛指解释(指代一般人)之间存在歧义。在研究1中,向儿童(N = 132,年龄3至10岁)提出了一系列包含“你”的问题,这些问题涉及描述性规范(例如,“你怎么处理自行车?”)或偏好(例如,“你喜欢怎么处理自行车?”)。在研究2中,父母与他们的孩子(N = 28,年龄2至4岁)谈论规定性规范(例如,“你应该怎么处理书籍?”)和偏好(例如,“你喜欢书籍的什么?”)。在两项研究中,儿童在回答中对代词的选择揭示了他们是否将问题中的“你”解释为泛指的或标准的。结果表明,儿童在规范语境中更常将“你”解释为泛指的(即回答中使用泛指的“你”,例如,“你读它们”),而在偏好语境中更常将其解释为标准的(即回答中使用“我”,例如,“我读它们”)。这种模式在学前早期就出现了,这为规范和偏好之间的区别指导幼儿对日常语言的解释和使用提供了首个证据。