1 University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2 University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Jun;45(6):947-964. doi: 10.1177/0146167218802832. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
Responses to norm violators are poorly understood. On one hand, norm violators are perceived as powerful, which may help them to get ahead. On the other hand, norm violators evoke moral outrage, which may frustrate their upward social mobility. We addressed this paradox by considering the role of culture. Collectivistic cultures value group harmony and tight cultures value social order. We therefore hypothesized that collectivism and tightness moderate reactions to norm violators. We presented 2,369 participants in 19 countries with a norm violation or a norm adherence scenario. In individualistic cultures, norm violators were considered more powerful than norm abiders and evoked less moral outrage, whereas in collectivistic cultures, norm violators were considered less powerful and evoked more moral outrage. Moreover, respondents in tighter cultures expressed a stronger preference for norm followers as leaders. Cultural values thus influence responses to norm violators, which may have downstream consequences for violators' hierarchical positions.
对违反规范者的反应还不太清楚。一方面,违反规范者被认为是有权力的,这可能有助于他们获得成功。另一方面,违反规范者会引起道德义愤,这可能会阻碍他们的社会地位提升。我们通过考虑文化的作用来解决这个悖论。集体主义文化重视群体和谐,而紧密文化重视社会秩序。因此,我们假设集体主义和紧密性会调节对违反规范者的反应。我们向 19 个国家的 2369 名参与者展示了一个违反规范或遵守规范的场景。在个人主义文化中,违反规范者被认为比遵守规范者更有权力,引起的道德义愤也更少,而在集体主义文化中,违反规范者被认为权力较小,引起的道德义愤更多。此外,文化价值观也会影响对违反规范者的反应,这可能会对违反者的等级地位产生下游影响。