Suppr超能文献

无麸质饮食:从开发到评估用于预防食品服务中麸质交叉污染的清单。

Gluten-Free Diet: From Development to Assessment of a Check-List Designed for the Prevention of Gluten Cross-Contamination in Food Services.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia (UnB), Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasilia DF 70910-900, Brazil.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia (UnB), Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasilia DF 70910-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2018 Sep 10;10(9):1274. doi: 10.3390/nu10091274.

Abstract

Gluten cross-contamination in gluten-free food may jeopardize treatment of celiac patients. Considering the deficit of appropriate instruments to enable the implementation of safe production practices for gluten-free food, this study aimed to evaluate the application of a check-list elaborated for gluten cross-contamination prevention in food services. The instrument was applied in 60 Brazilian food services. Interobserver reproducibility and internal consistency of the check-list were tested. A score classification was created for establishments according to the food contamination risk assessment. Subsequent to the application and statistical analysis, the original instrument was reduced to a 30-item check-list. In the reproducibility analysis, none of the 30 items showed significant divergence among the evaluators ( > 0.05 in the Cochran Q test). The 30-item version of the check-list presented Kuder⁻Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) = 0.771, indicating good internal consistency. The proposed classification score is obtained by adding 1 point for each item with an "adequate" response; therefore, the final score may vary between 0 and 30 points. Establishments with up to 15 points exhibit risk of gluten contamination, while establishments with a score above 16 points exhibit low risk of contamination. The check-list displayed good reproducibility and internal consistency, suggesting that it could be a useful gluten contamination control instrument in food services.

摘要

无麸质食品中的麸质交叉污染可能危及乳糜泻患者的治疗。鉴于缺乏适当的工具来实施无麸质食品的安全生产实践,本研究旨在评估用于食品服务中预防麸质交叉污染的检查表的应用。该工具应用于 60 家巴西食品服务机构。测试了检查表的观察者间再现性和内部一致性。根据食品污染风险评估,为各机构创建了评分分类。在应用和统计分析之后,原始工具被简化为 30 项检查表。在再现性分析中,30 项检查表中的任何一项在评估者之间都没有明显差异(Cochran Q 检验> 0.05)。检查表的 30 项版本的 Kuder⁻Richardson 公式 20(KR-20)= 0.771,表明内部一致性良好。所提出的分类评分是通过为每个“适当”回答的项目加 1 分获得的;因此,最终分数可能在 0 到 30 分之间变化。得分在 15 分以下的机构存在麸质污染的风险,而得分在 16 分以上的机构则存在低污染风险。检查表显示出良好的再现性和内部一致性,表明它可能是食品服务中控制麸质污染的有用工具。

相似文献

4
Celiac disease and school food service in Piedmont Region: Evaluation of gluten-free meal.
Ann Ig. 2016 Mar-Apr;28(2):145-57. doi: 10.7416/ai.2016.2093.
5
Gluten contamination in food services and industry: A systematic review.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(3):479-493. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1541864. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
6
Gluten contamination in gluten-free bakery products: a risk for coeliac disease patients.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Feb;20(3):413-416. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002433. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
8
Preparation of Gluten-Free Foods Alongside Gluten-Containing Food May Not Always Be as Risky for Celiac Patients as Diet Guides Suggest.
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):273-275. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
9
Celiac Disease: Risks of Cross-Contamination and Strategies for Gluten Removal in Food Environments.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 24;21(2):124. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020124.
10
Food Safety and Cross-Contamination of Gluten-Free Products: A Narrative Review.
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 29;13(7):2244. doi: 10.3390/nu13072244.

本文引用的文献

2
4
Novel treatments for celiac disease: glutenases and beyond.
Dig Dis. 2015;33(2):277-281. doi: 10.1159/000369536. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
6
Gluten contamination in foods labeled as "gluten free" in the United States.
J Food Prot. 2014 Oct;77(10):1830-3. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-149.
7
Evaluation of the quality of foods for special diets produced in a school catering facility within a HACCP-based approach: a case study.
Int J Environ Health Res. 2014;24(1):73-81. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2013.782605. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
9
[Construction and validation of an instrument to assess the Reception with Risk Rating].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2012 Sep-Oct;65(5):751-7. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672012000500006.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验