开始你们的合作关系：参与的过程。
Begin your partnership: the process of engagement.
机构信息
Healthy African American Families II (HAAF), Los Angeles, CA 90008, USA.
出版信息
Ethn Dis. 2009 Autumn;19(4 Suppl 6):S6-8-16.
Abstract
Community Partnered-Participatory Research (CPPR) is based on and utilizes community engagement as its central method and principle. In this chapter, we explain the key differences between engaging the community vs merely involving the community. The chapter also reviews the plan-do-action cycle of work that is used in each stage of CPPR. We define five key values of CPPR: respect for diversity, openness, equality, redirected power (empowerment), and an asset-based approach. In addition, we present 12 operational principles, which guide work throughout every stage of all CPPR initiatives.
摘要
社区伙伴关系参与式研究（CPPR）以社区参与为核心方法和原则。在本章中，我们解释了社区参与与社区参与之间的主要区别。本章还回顾了 CPPR 每个阶段使用的工作计划-行动-检查-处理循环。我们定义了 CPPR 的五个关键价值观：尊重多样性、开放性、平等、权力再分配（赋权）和基于资产的方法。此外，我们提出了 12 项操作原则，这些原则指导 CPPR 所有倡议的所有阶段的工作。
相似文献
1
Begin your partnership: the process of engagement.开始你们的合作关系：参与的过程。
Ethn Dis. 2009 Autumn;19(4 Suppl 6):S6-8-16.
2
The vision, valley, and victory of community engagement.社区参与的愿景、山谷和胜利。
Ethn Dis. 2009 Autumn;19(4 Suppl 6):S6-3-7.
3
Celebrate victory.庆祝胜利。
Ethn Dis. 2009 Autumn;19(4 Suppl 6):S6-59-71.
4
Work through the valley: plan.穿过山谷：计划。
Ethn Dis. 2009 Autumn;19(4 Suppl 6):S6-31-8.
5
Work through the valley: do.穿越山谷：前进。
Ethn Dis. 2009 Autumn;19(4 Suppl 6):S6-39-46.
6
Work through the valley: evaluate.穿越山谷：评估。
Ethn Dis. 2009 Autumn;19(4 Suppl 6):S6-47-58.
7
Community Leadership Institute for Equity: Planning Processes and Procedures to Develop Partnered Conferences.社区平等领导力研究所：制定合作会议的规划流程和程序。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2024;18(2):267-276.
8
Establishing a Framework for Sustainable Community Action Research.建立可持续社区行动研究框架。
Ethn Dis. 2022 Oct 20;32(4):333-340. doi: 10.18865/ed.32.4.333. eCollection 2022 Fall.
9
Collaborative/Participatory research.合作/参与式研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004 Feb;15(1):18-29. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2004.0015.
10
Perceptions of Empowerment Within and Across Partnerships in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Dyadic Interview Analysis.社区参与式研究中伙伴关系内部及跨伙伴关系的赋权认知：二元访谈分析
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):105-16. doi: 10.1177/1049732315577606. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
引用本文的文献
1
Improving Cancer Survivorship Care for Latino Adolescent, Young Adult Survivors through Community-Partnered Participatory Research.通过社区合作参与式研究改善拉丁裔青少年、青年癌症幸存者的癌症生存护理。
J Particip Res Methods. 2021;2(3). doi: 10.35844/001c.29534. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
2
Implementation of a Community-Partnered Research Suicide-Risk Management Protocol: Case Study From Community Partners in Care.实施社区合作研究自杀风险管理制度：社区关怀伙伴的案例研究
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Mar 1;72(3):281-287. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000095. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
Doing What We Know, Knowing What to Do: Californians Linking Action with Science for Prevention of Breast Cancer (CLASP-BC).知其可为而为之：加利福尼亚州以科学指导行动预防乳腺癌项目（CLASP-BC）。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;17(14):5050. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145050.
4
Community Engagement and Planning versus Resources for Services for Implementing Depression Quality Improvement: Exploratory Analysis for Black and Latino Adults.社区参与和规划与服务资源在实施抑郁质量改进方面的比较：针对黑人和拉丁裔成年人的探索性分析。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Apr 18;29(2):277-286. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.2.277. eCollection 2019 Spring.
5
Partnering with African American Churches to Create a Community Coalition for Mental Health.与非裔美国教堂合作，建立一个社区心理健康联盟。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):467-474. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.467. eCollection 2018.
6
Growing a Community-Academic Partnership: Lessons Learned in Forming a Qualitative Interview Team for the Community Partners in Care Study.培育社区-学术合作伙伴关系：在“社区伙伴参与照护研究”中组建定性访谈小组的经验教训。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):365-370. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.365. eCollection 2018.
7
Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards.从管线到提案奖的患者和利益相关者参与策略的经验教训。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):303-310. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.303. eCollection 2018.
8
Using Garden Cafés to engage community stakeholders in health research.利用花园咖啡馆让社区利益相关者参与健康研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0200483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200483. eCollection 2018.
9
Adapting medical guidelines to be patient-centered using a patient-driven process for individuals with sickle cell disease and their caregivers.采用以患者为驱动的流程，使医疗指南以镰状细胞病患者及其护理人员为中心。
BMC Hematol. 2018 Jun 8;18:12. doi: 10.1186/s12878-018-0106-3. eCollection 2018.
10
Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations.由社区联盟推动的干预措施，以减少种族和少数族裔人群之间的健康差距。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD009905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009905.pub2.
本文引用的文献
1
Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research.学术人员和临床医生参与社区参与式合作研究的策略。
JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):407-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.4.407.
Zotero 插件