Antunes-Foschini Rosália M S, Ho Wanli, Messias André
Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2018 Sep-Oct;81(5):401-407. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20180078.
To study visual acuity, refractive errors, eccentric fixation, and reading performance in patients with toxoplasmic macular retinochoroiditis.
Twenty-three participants with bilateral toxoplasmic macular retinochoroiditis and 4 with toxoplasmic macular retinocho-roiditis in their unique eye were evaluated. Participants reported their eye dominance, confirmed by the Portus and Miles test. Best corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent refraction, magnification need, and reading speed were measured. Microperimetry (MAIA, Centervue - Padova, Italy) recorded the preferred retinal locus and fixation stability by means of the bivariate contour ellipse area. Fourteen eyes from 14 normally sighted subjects served as controls.
Mean ± SD best corrected visual acuity was better in the dominant eye than in the nondominant eye: 0.9 ± 0.2 (logMAR 0.5 to 1.4) vs. 1.2 ± 0.3 (logMAR 0.6 to 1.7) (p<0.0001, paired t-test). Spherical equivalent myopia of -4.00 or higher was present in 42% of the eyes. Microperimetry was performed in 42 eyes. Eccentric fixation was observed in all examined eyes. In 14 eyes (33%), the preferred retinal locus was placed (in the retina) superior temporal to the macular lesion, in 10 (24%) superior nasal, in 6 (14%) inferior temporal, and in 12 (28%) inferior nasal. There was no significant difference in the distribution of the preferred retinal locus position between dominant and nondominant eyes (p=0.85, Pearson test). There was no correlation between reading speed and the distance between the preferred retinal locus and the estimated original foveal position (r=-0.09; p=0.73), the bivariate contour ellipse area (r=-0.19; p=0.44), or best corrected visual acuity (r=0.024; p=0.92).
Myopia is more prevalent in patients with toxoplasmic macular retinochoroiditis. Reading speed is not dependent on preferred retinal locus position, stability, or visual acuity. Nevertheless, documentation of fixation provides new data on the impact of visual impairment in these patients and may be useful for rehabilitation efforts.
研究弓形虫性黄斑视网膜脉络膜炎患者的视力、屈光不正、偏心注视和阅读能力。
对23例双侧弓形虫性黄斑视网膜脉络膜炎患者和4例单眼患有弓形虫性黄斑视网膜脉络膜炎的患者进行评估。参与者报告其优势眼,通过波图斯和迈尔斯测试进行确认。测量最佳矫正视力、等效球镜度、放大需求和阅读速度。使用微视野计(MAIA,意大利帕多瓦Centervue公司)通过双变量轮廓椭圆面积记录首选视网膜位点和注视稳定性。14名正常视力受试者的14只眼睛作为对照。
优势眼的平均±标准差最佳矫正视力优于非优势眼:0.9±0.2(对数最小分辨角视力0.5至1.4)对1.2±0.3(对数最小分辨角视力0.6至1.7)(p<0.0001,配对t检验)。42%的眼睛等效球镜近视度数为-4.00或更高。对42只眼睛进行了微视野计检查。所有检查的眼睛均观察到偏心注视。在14只眼睛(33%)中,首选视网膜位点位于(视网膜上)黄斑病变的颞上方,10只(24%)位于鼻上方,6只(14%)位于颞下方,12只(28%)位于鼻下方。优势眼和非优势眼之间首选视网膜位点位置的分布无显著差异(p=0.85,皮尔逊检验)。阅读速度与首选视网膜位点与估计的原黄斑中心凹位置之间的距离(r=-0.09;p=0.73)、双变量轮廓椭圆面积(r=-0.19;p=0.44)或最佳矫正视力(r=0.024;p=0.92)均无相关性。
近视在弓形虫性黄斑视网膜脉络膜炎患者中更为普遍。阅读速度不依赖于首选视网膜位点位置、稳定性或视力。尽管如此,注视记录为这些患者视力损害的影响提供了新数据,可能对康复工作有用。