Suppr超能文献

使用微视野声生物反馈训练治疗中心性暗点患者的低视力康复效果。

Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation Using Microperimetric Acoustic Biofeedback Training in Patients with Central Scotoma.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of ophthalmology, Niv Eye Center, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

Curr Eye Res. 2021 May;46(5):731-738. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1833348. Epub 2020 Oct 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of visual rehabilitation with microperimeter biofeedback in patients with central scotoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

35 consecutive patients with central scotoma (17 age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 14 Stargardt disease, and 4 cone dystrophy) were included in the study. Visual acuity, reading performance by Minnesota Low Vision Reading Test (MNREAD), quality of life by 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), and fixation analysis by MAIA microperimeter were evaluated before and 1 month after training. The rehabilitation program consisted of 10 training sessions of 10 minutes.

RESULTS

The median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.80 logMAR (range 0.3 to 1.3 logMAR). Fifty-nine percent of patients with AMD developed a preferred retinal locus (PRL) nasal to the fovea, and 64% of the patients with Stargardt disease preferred a PRL superior to the fovea. The PRL location in 3 of 4 cone dystrophy patients was nasal to the fovea. The mean PRL distance from the fovea was 7.57 ± 3.61 degrees. Fixation stability improved with P1 values of 22.34 ± 11.81 versus 32.05 ± 18.79 ( = .003) and 95% bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) values of 41.6 versus 23.6 ( = .018) before and after training, respectively. There was a significant difference in reading acuity between before and after training ( = 0.008). The overall score and near activities score of NEI VFQ-25 were found to be increased at the end of the rehabilitation ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Rehabilitation with acoustic biofeedback in patients with central scotoma looks like a useful technique for improving fixation stability, reading performance and quality of life.

摘要

目的

评估微视野生物反馈在中心暗点患者视觉康复中的疗效。

材料与方法

纳入 35 例中心暗点患者(17 例年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD),14 例 Stargardt 病,4 例 Cone 营养不良)。分别在训练前和训练后 1 个月进行视力、明尼苏达州低视力阅读测试(MNREAD)阅读表现、25 项国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(NEI VFQ-25)生活质量和 MAIA 微视野仪的固视分析。康复方案由 10 次、每次 10 分钟的训练组成。

结果

中位最佳矫正视力(BCVA)为 0.80 对数视力(LogMAR)(范围 0.3 至 1.3 LogMAR)。59%的 AMD 患者的最佳固视点(PRL)位于黄斑鼻侧,64%的 Stargardt 病患者的 PRL 位于黄斑上方。4 例 Cone 营养不良患者中有 3 例的 PRL 位于黄斑鼻侧。PRL 距黄斑的平均距离为 7.57±3.61 度。P1 值分别为 22.34±11.81 和 32.05±18.79( =0.003),95%双变量轮廓椭圆面积(BCEA)值分别为 41.6 和 23.6( =0.018),训练后固视稳定性改善。训练前后阅读视力有显著差异( =0.008)。康复结束时,NEI VFQ-25 的总体评分和近距活动评分均增加( <0.001)。

结论

在中心暗点患者中,使用声学生物反馈进行康复治疗似乎是一种有用的技术,可以提高固视稳定性、阅读表现和生活质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验