Ratra Dhanashree, Gopalakrishnan Sarika, Dalan Daleena, Ratra Vineet, Damkondwar Deepali, Laxmi Gella
Department of Vitreoretinal Diseases, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Low Vision Care Clinic, Department of Optometry, Shanmugha Arts, Science, Technology & Research Academy, Thanjavur, India.
Clin Exp Optom. 2019 Mar;102(2):172-179. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12834. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
Patients with central scotoma have poor fixation stability and poor visual acuity. Acoustic biofeedback training can be an effective way to train such patients to eccentrically fixate. This study analyses the mean retinal sensitivity, saccadic velocity, and fixation stability after acoustic biofeedback training and shows correlation with age and scotoma size.
Patients with irreversible central scotoma in both the eyes secondary to macular diseases were selected. After undergoing comprehensive low vision assessment, 19 patients who were willing were recruited for the acoustic biofeedback training to the better eye in 10 sessions, using the MP-1 Microperimeter. Mean retinal sensitivity, saccadic velocity, fixation stability before and after the acoustic biofeedback were recorded.
There were 17 men and two women. Ages ranged from 19-94 years (mean 54.63 ± 24.66). The scotoma size ranged from four to 20 degrees. Ten patients had age-related macular degeneration, four had Stargardt disease, three had traumatic macular scar, two had scarred myopic choroidal neovascular membrane, and one had myopic macular degeneration. The vision improved from 1.06 ± 0.36 to 0.86 ± 0.33 logMAR (p < 0.0001). The mean retinal sensitivity improved from 2.1 ± 2.9 dB to 2.7 ± 3.1 dB (p = 0.01), with negative correlation with age (p = 0.01) and scotoma size (p = 0.02). Fixation stability improved with reduction in the bivariate contour ellipse area (p = 0.01). It showed negative correlation with age (p = 0.02) and scotoma size (p = 0.10). The saccadic velocity reduced from 0.34°/second to 0.26°/second but was not significant (p > 0.99). The majority (58 per cent) had their preferred retinal locus superior to the fovea. There was good agreement between bivariate contour ellipse area and MP-1 Microperimeter inbuilt fixation parameters. The effect was maintained at six months with slight reduction in fixation stability.
Acoustic biofeedback can improve fixation behaviour, visual acuity and retinal sensitivity in patients with central scotoma. The results are better with younger age and smaller scotoma size.
中心暗点患者的注视稳定性差且视力不佳。听觉生物反馈训练可能是训练此类患者进行偏心注视的有效方法。本研究分析了听觉生物反馈训练后的平均视网膜敏感度、扫视速度和注视稳定性,并显示其与年龄和暗点大小的相关性。
选取双眼因黄斑疾病导致不可逆中心暗点的患者。在进行全面的低视力评估后,招募了19名愿意接受训练的患者,使用MP-1微视野计对较好眼进行10次听觉生物反馈训练。记录听觉生物反馈训练前后的平均视网膜敏感度、扫视速度和注视稳定性。
有17名男性和2名女性。年龄范围为19 - 94岁(平均54.63±24.66岁)。暗点大小范围为4至20度。10名患者患有年龄相关性黄斑变性,4名患有斯塔加特病,3名患有外伤性黄斑瘢痕,2名患有瘢痕性近视脉络膜新生血管膜,1名患有近视性黄斑变性。视力从1.06±0.36提高到0.86±0.33 logMAR(p < 0.0001)。平均视网膜敏感度从2.1±2.9 dB提高到2.7±3.1 dB(p = 0.01),与年龄(p = 0.01)和暗点大小(p = 0.02)呈负相关。注视稳定性随着双变量轮廓椭圆面积的减小而提高(p = 0.01)。它与年龄(p = 0.02)和暗点大小(p = 0.10)呈负相关。扫视速度从0.34°/秒降至0.26°/秒,但差异不显著(p > 0.99)。大多数(58%)患者的首选视网膜位点位于中央凹上方。双变量轮廓椭圆面积与MP-1微视野计内置的注视参数之间具有良好的一致性。在六个月时效果得以维持,但注视稳定性略有下降。
听觉生物反馈可改善中心暗点患者的注视行为、视力和视网膜敏感度。年龄较小和暗点较小的患者结果更好。