Czerwińska Monika E, Melzig Matthias F
Department of Pharmacognosy and Molecular Basis of Phytotherapy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universtaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Aug 28;9:894. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00894. eCollection 2018.
Among 65 species belonging to the genus only two, L. and Sieb. et Zucc. (Cornaceae), have been traditionally used since ancient times. (cornelian cherry) is native to southern Europe and southwest Asia, whereas (Asiatic dogwood, cornel dogwood) is a deciduous tree distributed in eastern Asia, mainly in China, as well as Korea and Japan. Based on the different geographic distribution of the closely related species but clearly distinct taxa, the ethnopharmacological use of and seems to be independently originated. Many reports on the quality of fruits were performed due to their value as edible fruits, and few reports compared their physicochemical properties with other edible fruits. However, the detailed phytochemical profiles of and , in particular fruits, have never been compared. The aim of this review was highlighting the similarities and differences of phytochemicals found in fruits of and in relation to their biological effects as well as compare the therapeutic use of fruits from both traditional species. The fruits of and are characterized by the presence of secondary metabolites, in particular iridoids, anthocyanins, phenolic acids and flavonoids. However, much more not widely known iridoids, such as morroniside, as well as tannins were detected particularly in fruits of . The referred studies of biological activity of both species indicate their antidiabetic and hepatoprotective properties. Based on the available reports antihyperlipidemic and anticoagulant activity seems to be unique for extracts of fruits, whereas antiosteoporotic and immunomodulatory activities were assigned to preparations of fruits. In conclusion, the comparison of phytochemical composition of fruits from both species revealed a wide range of similarities as well as some constituents unique for cornelian cherry or Asiatic dogwood. Thus, these phytochemicals are considered the important factor determining the biological activity and justifying the use of and in the traditional European and Asiatic medicine.
在该属的65个物种中,自古以来传统上仅使用过两种,即欧洲山茱萸(L.)和山茱萸(Sieb. et Zucc.,山茱萸科)。欧洲山茱萸原产于南欧和西南亚,而山茱萸(山茱萸、茱萸)是一种落叶乔木,分布于东亚,主要在中国,以及韩国和日本。基于密切相关但明显不同的分类群的不同地理分布,欧洲山茱萸和山茱萸的民族药理学用途似乎是独立起源的。由于其作为可食用水果的价值,对欧洲山茱萸果实质量进行了许多报道,很少有报道将其理化性质与其他可食用水果进行比较。然而,欧洲山茱萸和山茱萸,特别是果实的详细植物化学特征从未被比较过。本综述的目的是突出欧洲山茱萸和山茱萸果实中发现的植物化学物质的异同及其生物学效应,并比较这两种传统物种果实的治疗用途。欧洲山茱萸和山茱萸的果实以次生代谢产物的存在为特征,特别是环烯醚萜、花青素(花色苷)、酚酸和黄酮类化合物。然而,特别是在山茱萸果实中检测到了更多鲜为人知的环烯醚萜,如山茱萸苷,以及单宁。关于这两个物种生物活性的相关研究表明它们具有抗糖尿病和保肝特性。根据现有报道,降血脂和抗凝血活性似乎是欧洲山茱萸果实提取物所特有的,而抗骨质疏松和免疫调节活性则归因于山茱萸果实制剂。总之,对这两个物种果实的植物化学成分进行比较,发现了广泛的相似之处以及一些欧洲山茱萸或山茱萸特有的成分。因此,这些植物化学物质被认为是决定生物学活性的重要因素,也是欧洲和亚洲传统医学中使用欧洲山茱萸和山茱萸的依据。