• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于在临床试验中运用技术以电子方式收集患者报告结局数据的培训:电子患者报告结局联盟的最佳实践建议

Training on the Use of Technology to Collect Patient-Reported Outcome Data Electronically in Clinical Trials: Best Practice Recommendations from the ePRO Consortium.

作者信息

Ly Jenny J, Crescioni Mabel, Eremenco Sonya, Bodart Serge, Donoso Mario, Butler Adam J, Dallabrida Susan M

机构信息

1 eResearchTechnology Inc, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

2 Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Jul;53(4):431-440. doi: 10.1177/2168479018796206. Epub 2018 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1177/2168479018796206
PMID:30221997
Abstract

Electronic capture of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data has many advantages over paper-based data collection. Regulatory agencies have consistently supported the use of electronic PRO (ePRO) data capture and recommended participant and site staff training on the correct use of electronic data capture systems. The objective of this paper is to outline best practice recommendations for training end users, including site staff and study participants, on the use of ePRO technology in clinical trials to enable consistent, accurate, and complete data collection. Site personnel should be trained on study-specific as well as technology-specific topics and be given instructions on whom to contact to obtain technical support. Optimal training takes place over time using multiple modalities, including hands-on, face-to-face training at an investigator meeting or directly in the clinical site; remote training via webinar or teleconference; interactive on-demand self-paced-training via e-learning modalities; and supplemented by proxy training performed by study clinical research associates. Like site personnel training, study participants should be provided with individual, hands-on training by site staff at the initiation of the trial and in conjunction with interactive electronic training modules that can be accessed on-demand throughout the duration of the trial. The recommendations put forth in this paper provide a structured framework for the training that site personnel and study participants need to optimize the advantages trials can gain from using ePRO data collection systems.

摘要

与纸质数据收集相比,电子采集患者报告结局(PRO)数据具有诸多优势。监管机构一直支持使用电子PRO(ePRO)数据采集,并建议对参与者和研究点工作人员进行关于正确使用电子数据采集系统的培训。本文的目的是概述针对终端用户(包括研究点工作人员和研究参与者)进行培训的最佳实践建议,内容涉及在临床试验中使用ePRO技术以实现一致、准确和完整的数据收集。研究点人员应接受针对特定研究以及特定技术主题的培训,并得到关于向谁寻求技术支持的指导。最佳培训应随着时间推移通过多种方式进行,包括在研究者会议上或直接在临床研究点进行的实践操作、面对面培训;通过网络研讨会或电话会议进行的远程培训;通过电子学习方式进行的交互式按需自主培训;并辅以由研究临床研究助理进行的代理培训。与研究点人员培训一样,在试验开始时,研究参与者应由研究点工作人员提供个性化的实践操作培训,并结合可在试验期间按需访问的交互式电子培训模块。本文提出的建议为研究点人员和研究参与者所需的培训提供了一个结构化框架,以优化试验使用ePRO数据收集系统所能获得的优势。

相似文献

1
Training on the Use of Technology to Collect Patient-Reported Outcome Data Electronically in Clinical Trials: Best Practice Recommendations from the ePRO Consortium.关于在临床试验中运用技术以电子方式收集患者报告结局数据的培训:电子患者报告结局联盟的最佳实践建议
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Jul;53(4):431-440. doi: 10.1177/2168479018796206. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
2
Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data-recommendations for clinical trial teams: report of the ISPOR ePRO systems validation good research practices task force.电子系统采集患者报告结局(PRO)数据的验证——临床试验团队的建议:ISPOR ePRO 系统验证良好研究实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):480-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.002.
3
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
4
Best Practices for Avoiding Paper Backup When Implementing Electronic Approaches to Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials.在临床试验中采用电子方式收集患者报告结局数据时避免纸质备份的最佳实践
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Jul;53(4):441-445. doi: 10.1177/2168479018785160. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
Best Practice Recommendations for Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Dataset Structure and Standardization to Support Drug Development.支持药物开发的电子患者报告结局数据集结构和标准化的最佳实践推荐
Value Health. 2023 Aug;26(8):1242-1248. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.011. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
6
Use of daily electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) diaries in randomized controlled trials for rheumatoid arthritis: rationale and implementation.在类风湿关节炎随机对照试验中使用每日电子患者报告结局(PRO)日记:基本原理与实施
Trials. 2019 Mar 22;20(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3272-0.
7
Optimizing Electronic Capture of Clinical Outcome Assessment Data in Clinical Trials: The Case of Patient-Reported Endpoints.优化临床试验中临床结局评估数据的电子采集:以患者报告的终点为例
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Nov;49(6):797-804. doi: 10.1177/2168479015609102.
8
Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials.以电子方式收集患者报告结局(PRO)数据:临床试验中电子PRO测量的过去、现在与前景
Patient. 2015 Aug;8(4):301-9. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0090-z.
9
Electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes following discharge after surgery: systematic review.术后出院后患者报告结局的电子采集:系统评价。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa072.
10
Study within a trial of electronic versus paper-based Patient-Reported oUtcomes CollEction (SPRUCE): study protocol for a partially randomised patient preference study.在一项电子与纸质患者报告结局采集(SPRUCE)的试验中进行研究:一项部分随机患者偏好研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):e073817. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073817.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of evaluating AI-enabled digital symptom monitoring in metastatic patients with NSCLC receiving pembrolizumab therapy: A German single-arm observational pilot study.评估接受派姆单抗治疗的非小细胞肺癌转移患者中人工智能驱动的数字症状监测的可行性:一项德国单臂观察性试点研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 15;11:20552076251348584. doi: 10.1177/20552076251348584. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Data collection methods for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer randomised controlled trials: a protocol for a rapid scoping review.癌症随机对照试验中患者报告结局测量数据收集方法的快速范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 10;14(9):e084935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084935.
3
How to select and understand guidelines for patient-reported outcomes: a scoping review of existing guidance.
如何选择和理解患者报告结局指南:现有指南的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10707-8.
4
Narrative review of telemedicine applications in decentralized research.远程医疗在分散式研究中的应用叙述性综述
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jan 22;8(1):e30. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.3. eCollection 2024.
5
Patient-targeted education (ePRO-E) to increase ePRO intent within an Alliance clinical trial (A221805-SI1).以患者为中心的教育(ePRO-E),提高联盟临床试验(A221805-SI1)中的 ePRO 意愿。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Jan 4;8(1). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae002.
6
Impact of an Electronic Medical Record-Connected Questionnaire on Efficient Nursing Documentation: Usability and Efficacy Study.电子病历关联问卷对高效护理记录的影响:可用性与功效研究
JMIR Nurs. 2023 Sep 25;6:e51303. doi: 10.2196/51303.
7
Patient-Reported Outcomes Collection at an Urban HIV Clinic Associated With a Historically Black Medical College in the Southern United States: Qualitative Interview Study Among Patients With HIV.美国南部一所历史悠久的黑人医学院附属城市艾滋病诊所的患者报告结局收集:对艾滋病患者的定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 22;7:e42888. doi: 10.2196/42888.
8
Developing a Mobile Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Administration System to Capture Postradiation Toxicity in Oncology: Usability and Feasibility Study.开发一个用于不良事件管理系统的移动患者报告结局版常见术语标准,以捕捉肿瘤学中的放疗后毒性:可用性和可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 12;6(4):e27775. doi: 10.2196/27775.
9
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Experience Measures Within Evaluation Studies of Telemedicine Applications: Systematic Review.使用患者报告的结局测量和患者报告的体验测量在远程医疗应用评估研究中:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 17;23(11):e30042. doi: 10.2196/30042.