• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以电子方式收集患者报告结局(PRO)数据:临床试验中电子PRO测量的过去、现在与前景

Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Coons Stephen Joel, Eremenco Sonya, Lundy J Jason, O'Donohoe Paul, O'Gorman Hannah, Malizia William

机构信息

Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA,

出版信息

Patient. 2015 Aug;8(4):301-9. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0090-z.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-014-0090-z
PMID:25300613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4529477/
Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an important means of evaluating the treatment benefit of new medical products. It is recognized that PRO measures should be used when assessing concepts best known by the patient or best measured from the patient's perspective. As a result, there is growing emphasis on well defined and reliable PRO measures. In addition, advances in technology have significantly increased electronic PRO (ePRO) data collection capabilities and options in clinical trials. The movement from paper-based to ePRO data capture has enhanced the integrity and accuracy of clinical trial data and is encouraged by regulators. A primary distinction in the types of ePRO platforms is between telephone-based interactive voice response systems and screen-based systems. Handheld touchscreen-based devices have become the mainstay for remote (i.e., off-site, unsupervised) PRO data collection in clinical trials. The conventional approach is to provide study subjects with a handheld device with a device-based proprietary software program. However, an emerging alternative for clinical trials is called bring your own device (BYOD). Leveraging study subjects' own Internet-enabled mobile devices for remote PRO data collection (via a downloadable app or a Web-based data collection portal) has become possible due to the widespread use of personal smartphones and tablets. However, there are a number of scientific and operational issues that must be addressed before BYOD can be routinely considered as a practical alternative to conventional ePRO data collection methods. Nevertheless, the future for ePRO data collection is bright and the promise of BYOD opens a new chapter in its evolution.

摘要

患者报告结局(PROs)是评估新型医疗产品治疗益处的重要手段。人们认识到,在评估患者最为了解或最适合从患者角度进行衡量的概念时,应使用PRO测量方法。因此,人们越来越重视定义明确且可靠的PRO测量方法。此外,技术进步显著提高了临床试验中电子PRO(ePRO)数据收集的能力和选择。从纸质数据采集向ePRO数据采集的转变提高了临床试验数据的完整性和准确性,并且受到监管机构的鼓励。ePRO平台类型的一个主要区别在于基于电话的交互式语音应答系统和基于屏幕的系统之间。基于手持触摸屏的设备已成为临床试验中远程(即非现场、无监督)PRO数据收集的主要方式。传统方法是为研究对象提供一台装有基于设备的专有软件程序的手持设备。然而,临床试验中一种新兴的替代方法称为自带设备(BYOD)。由于个人智能手机和平板电脑的广泛使用,利用研究对象自己的联网移动设备进行远程PRO数据收集(通过可下载应用程序或基于网络的数据收集门户)已成为可能。然而,在BYOD能够被常规视为传统ePRO数据收集方法的一种实用替代方案之前,有许多科学和操作问题必须得到解决。尽管如此,ePRO数据收集的未来前景光明,BYOD的前景为其发展开启了新的篇章。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9223/4529477/43c39d263e53/40271_2014_90_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9223/4529477/5bf327066dc2/40271_2014_90_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9223/4529477/43c39d263e53/40271_2014_90_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9223/4529477/5bf327066dc2/40271_2014_90_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9223/4529477/43c39d263e53/40271_2014_90_Figb_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials.以电子方式收集患者报告结局(PRO)数据:临床试验中电子PRO测量的过去、现在与前景
Patient. 2015 Aug;8(4):301-9. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0090-z.
2
"Bring Your Own Device" (BYOD): The Future of Field-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials?“自带设备”(BYOD):临床试验中基于现场的患者报告结局数据收集的未来?
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Nov;49(6):783-791. doi: 10.1177/2168479015609104.
3
Optimizing Electronic Capture of Clinical Outcome Assessment Data in Clinical Trials: The Case of Patient-Reported Endpoints.优化临床试验中临床结局评估数据的电子采集:以患者报告的终点为例
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Nov;49(6):797-804. doi: 10.1177/2168479015609102.
4
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
5
To BYOD or not: Are device latencies important for bring-your-own-device (BYOD) smartphone cognitive testing?是否采用自带设备(BYOD):设备延迟对于自带设备(BYOD)智能手机认知测试重要吗?
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2800-2812. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01925-1. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
6
Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Scale Types Collected Using Bring Your Own Device Compared to Paper and a Provisioned Device: Results of a Randomized Equivalence Trial.使用自带设备与纸质和专用设备收集的患者报告结局测量反应量表类型的测量等效性:一项随机等效性试验的结果。
Value Health. 2018 May;21(5):581-589. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Migrated to Electronic Formats: A Review of Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Trials and Bring Your Own Device.迁移至电子格式的患者报告结局测量指标的测量等效性:临床试验及自带设备的证据综述与建议
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Jul;53(4):426-430. doi: 10.1177/2168479018793369. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
8
Use of daily electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) diaries in randomized controlled trials for rheumatoid arthritis: rationale and implementation.在类风湿关节炎随机对照试验中使用每日电子患者报告结局(PRO)日记:基本原理与实施
Trials. 2019 Mar 22;20(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3272-0.
9
Hospital Bring-Your-Own-Device Security Challenges and Solutions: Systematic Review of Gray Literature.医院自带设备安全挑战与解决方案:灰色文献系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 18;8(6):e18175. doi: 10.2196/18175.
10
The Computer-based Health Evaluation Software (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring.计算机化健康评估软件(CHES):一种电子患者报告结局监测软件。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Nov 9;12:126. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-126.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic patient-reported outcome systems and capabilities in cancer care: a systematic review.癌症护理中的电子患者报告结局系统及功能:一项系统综述
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;7:1560533. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1560533. eCollection 2025.
2
A scoping review of frameworks evaluating digital health applications.一项关于评估数字健康应用程序的框架的范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;11:20552076251315297. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315297. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Adaptation of Clinical Research Staff to Decentralized Clinical Trials and Impacts on the Patient-Centered Experience: Qualitative Interview Study.

本文引用的文献

1
PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes: report of the ISPOR PRO mixed modes good research practices task force.临床研究中使用混合模式进行 PRO 数据收集:ISPOR PRO 混合模式良好研究实践工作组的报告。
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):501-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.06.005.
2
Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data-recommendations for clinical trial teams: report of the ISPOR ePRO systems validation good research practices task force.电子系统采集患者报告结局(PRO)数据的验证——临床试验团队的建议:ISPOR ePRO 系统验证良好研究实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):480-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.002.
3
临床研究人员对去中心化临床试验的适应及其对以患者为中心体验的影响:定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 16;27:e62947. doi: 10.2196/62947.
4
Transforming Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement With Digital Health Technology.利用数字健康技术转变患者报告结局测量
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70107. doi: 10.1111/jep.70107.
5
Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures and quality of life in cancer (E-PROMISE): systematic review of the evidence and meta-analysis.电子患者报告结局指标与癌症患者生活质量(E-PROMISE):证据的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Apr 28;14(2):e003209. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003209.
6
Investigating Measurement Equivalence of Smartphone Sensor-Based Assessments: Remote, Digital, Bring-Your-Own-Device Study.调查基于智能手机传感器评估的测量等效性:远程、数字、自带设备研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 3;27:e63090. doi: 10.2196/63090.
7
Circadian rhythmicity of symptomatic phenotypes in multiple sclerosis: the CircaMS study protocol and feasibility of biomarker collection.多发性硬化症症状性表型的昼夜节律:CircaMS研究方案及生物标志物收集的可行性
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e095357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095357.
8
Principles of good practice for translation of electronic clinical outcome assessments.电子临床结局评估翻译的良好实践原则。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Mar 4;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00859-4.
9
Best practices and pragmatic approaches for patient-reported outcomes and quality of life measures in cancer clinical trials.癌症临床试验中患者报告结局和生活质量测量的最佳实践与实用方法
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2025 Mar 1;2025(68):14-21. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae047.
10
Measurement Equivalence and Feasibility of the Electronic and Paper Versions of the POSAS, EQ-5D, and DLQI: A Randomized Crossover Trial.POSAS、EQ-5D和DLQI电子版本与纸质版本的测量等效性及可行性:一项随机交叉试验
Eur Burn J. 2024 Oct 11;5(4):321-334. doi: 10.3390/ebj5040030.
Electronic Patient Diaries and Questionnaires - ePRO Now Delivering on the Promise?
电子患者日记与问卷——电子患者报告结局现正兑现承诺?
Patient. 2010 Sep 1;3(3):179-83. doi: 10.2165/11537600-000000000-00000.
4
Standardizing measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Reliability and validity of a patient-reported diary.标准化慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重的测量。患者报告日记的可靠性和有效性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 1;183(3):323-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201005-0762OC. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
5
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
6
Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review.患者报告结局测量的电子管理与纸笔管理的等效性:一项荟萃分析综述。
Value Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):322-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x.
7
Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data.尽管存在技术问题,但在收集患者日记数据时,个人数字助理比纸笔表现更出色。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
8
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.行业指南:患者报告的结局指标:用于医疗产品开发以支持标签声明:指南草案
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-79.
9
Validation of electronic data capture of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome--Quality of Life Measure, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the EuroQol.肠易激综合征生活质量测量量表、肠易激综合征工作效率与活动受限问卷以及欧洲五维度健康量表电子数据采集的验证
Value Health. 2006 Mar-Apr;9(2):98-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00087.x.
10
Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis.风湿病诊所中的触摸屏计算机系统提供了一种可靠且用户友好的方式,用于收集类风湿性关节炎患者的生活质量和治疗结果数据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Jan;45(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei100. Epub 2005 Nov 1.