Department of Sport Medicine and Functional Explorations, Diet and Musculoskeletal Health Team, CRNH, INRA, University Teaching Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Laboratory AME2P, University of Clermont Auvergne, Aubière, France.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Jan;29(1):4-15. doi: 10.1111/sms.13301. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
The benefits of eccentric (ECC) training on fat mass (FM) remain underexplored. We hypothesized that in obese adolescents, ECC cycling training is more efficient for decreasing whole-body FM percentage compared to concentric (CON) performed at the same oxygen consumption (VO ). Twenty-four adolescents aged 13.4 ± 1.3 years (BMI > 90th percentile) were randomized to ECC or CON. They performed three cyclo-ergometer sessions per week (30 min per session) for 12 weeks: two habituation, 5 at 50% VO , and 5 at 70% VO . Anthropometric measurements, body composition, maximal incremental CON tests, strength tests, and blood samples were assessed pre- and post-training. Whole-body FM percentage decreased significantly after compared to pretraining in both groups, though to a larger extent in the ECC group (ECC: -10% vs CON: -4.2%, P < 0.05). Whole-body lean mass (LM) percentage increased significantly in both groups after compared to pretraining, with a greater increase in the ECC group (ECC: 3.8% vs CON: 1.5%, P <0.05). The improvements in leg FM and LM percentages were greater in the ECC group (-6.5% and 3.0%, P = 0.01 and P < 0.01). Quadriceps isometric and isokinetic ECC strength increased significantly more in the ECC group (28.3% and 21.3%, P < 0.05). Both groups showed similar significant VO improvement (ECC: 15.4% vs CON: 10.3%). The decrease in homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index was significant in the ECC group (-19.9%). In conclusion, although both ECC and CON cycling trainings are efficient to decrease FM, ECC induces greater FM reduction, strength gains, and insulin resistance improvements and represents an optimal modality to recommend for obese adolescents.
关于离心(ECC)训练对脂肪量(FM)的益处,目前仍研究不足。我们假设,在肥胖青少年中,与在相同耗氧量(VO)下进行的向心(CON)运动相比,ECC 自行车训练更有效地降低全身 FM 百分比。24 名年龄为 13.4±1.3 岁(BMI>第 90 百分位)的青少年被随机分配到 ECC 或 CON 组。他们每周进行三次自行车运动训练(每次 30 分钟),共 12 周:2 次适应期,5 次 50%VO,和 5 次 70%VO。在训练前后评估了人体测量学测量、身体成分、最大递增 CON 测试、力量测试和血液样本。与训练前相比,两组的全身 FM 百分比均显著下降,但 ECC 组下降幅度更大(ECC:-10%比 CON:-4.2%,P<0.05)。与训练前相比,两组的全身瘦体重(LM)百分比均显著增加,ECC 组的增加幅度更大(ECC:3.8%比 CON:1.5%,P<0.05)。ECC 组腿部 FM 和 LM 百分比的改善更大(-6.5%和 3.0%,P=0.01 和 P<0.01)。ECC 组股四头肌等长和等速 ECC 力量显著增加(28.3%和 21.3%,P<0.05)。两组 VO 均有显著改善(ECC:15.4%比 CON:10.3%)。ECC 组的稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数降低显著(-19.9%)。总之,尽管 ECC 和 CON 自行车训练都能有效地减少 FM,但 ECC 诱导的 FM 减少更多,力量增加更多,胰岛素抵抗改善更多,是肥胖青少年的最佳推荐方式。