Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 1;144(7):1550-1560. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31872. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
3w?>Studies investigating the association of Mediterranean diet (MD) adherence with pancreatic cancer risk are limited and had inconsistent results. We examined the association between MD adherence and pancreatic cancer incidence by pooling data from the Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS, 120,852 subjects) and the Dutch cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-NL, 40,011 subjects). MD adherence was assessed using alternate and modified Mediterranean diet scores (aMED and mMED, respectively), including and excluding alcohol. After median follow-ups of 20.3 (NLCS) and 19.2 (EPIC-NL) years, 449 microscopically confirmed pancreatic cancer (MCPC) cases were included in study-specific multivariable Cox models. Study-specific estimates were pooled using a random-effects model. MD adherence was not significantly associated with MCPC risk in pooled and study-specific analyses, regardless of sex and MD score. Pooled hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for high (6-8) compared to low (0-3) values of mMED excluding alcohol were 0.66 (0.40-1.10) in men and 0.94 (0.63-1.40) in women. In never smokers, mMED excluding alcohol seemed to be inversely associated with MCPC risk (nonsignificant). However, no association was observed in ever smokers (p = 0.03). Hazard ratios were consistent across strata of other potential effect modifiers. Considering MD scores excluding alcohol, mMED-containing models generally fitted better than aMED-containing models, particularly in men. Although associations somewhat differed when all pancreatic cancers were considered instead of MCPC, the overall conclusion was similar. In conclusion, MD adherence was not associated with pancreatic cancer risk in a pooled analysis of two Dutch cohorts.
3w?>研究地中海饮食(MD)依从性与胰腺癌风险之间关系的研究有限,且结果不一致。我们通过汇总荷兰队列研究(NLCS,120852 名受试者)和欧洲前瞻性癌症与营养研究荷兰队列(EPIC-NL,40011 名受试者)的数据,研究了 MD 依从性与胰腺癌发病之间的关系。MD 依从性使用替代和改良的地中海饮食评分(aMED 和 mMED)进行评估,包括和不包括酒精。NLCS 和 EPIC-NL 的中位随访时间分别为 20.3 年和 19.2 年后,在特定的多变量 Cox 模型中纳入了 449 例经显微镜证实的胰腺癌(MCPC)病例。使用随机效应模型对特定研究的估计值进行了汇总。无论性别和 MD 评分如何,在汇总和特定研究分析中,MD 依从性与 MCPC 风险均无显著相关性。在男性中,与低 mMED 评分(0-3)相比,高 mMED 评分(6-8)的 pooled 危险比(95%置信区间)为 0.66(0.40-1.10),而在女性中为 0.94(0.63-1.40)。在从不吸烟者中,mMED 排除酒精后似乎与 MCPC 风险呈负相关(无统计学意义)。然而,在吸烟者中没有观察到相关性(p = 0.03)。危险比在其他潜在效应修饰剂的分层中是一致的。考虑到排除酒精的 MD 评分,mMED 包含的模型通常比 aMED 包含的模型拟合得更好,特别是在男性中。尽管当考虑所有胰腺癌而不是 MCPC 时,相关性有所不同,但总体结论相似。总之,在对两个荷兰队列的汇总分析中,MD 依从性与胰腺癌风险无关。