Pietilä Juhani, Huhtala Anne, Mäkinen Petri, Nättinen Janika, Rajala Teppo, Salmenhaara Kalle, Uusitalo Hannu
Silmäasema Eye Hospital, Tampere, Finland,
Silmäasema Eye Hospital, Helsinki, Finland,
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 10;12:1741-1755. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S172894. eCollection 2018.
To compare factors affecting patient satisfaction after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia in the real-life situation study.
The SMILE group included 100 eyes (51 patients) and the FS-LASIK group 200 eyes (102 patients). In addition to clinical examination, dry eye symptoms and patient satisfaction with far and near vision were reported and graded on the visual analog scale preoperatively and one month after the operation. Case-control pairs were selected for the SMILE patients from FS-LASIK-treated patients to ensure the homogeneity in spherical equivalent refraction, preoperative dry eye, and visual satisfaction.
Eighty percent of SMILE eyes and 83% of FS-LASIK eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Predictability (±0.5 D of mean target spherical equivalent refraction) was 91% in SMILE and 93.5% in FS-LASIK. No eyes lost two or more Snellen lines of corrected distance visual acuity. Based on case-control pairs, dry eye symptoms remained the same after one month in the FS-LASIK-treated eyes (=0.87) but decreased in the SMILE-treated eyes (=0.01) compared with the preoperative situation. Patient satisfaction with far vision improved significantly in both groups (<0.001), but satisfaction with near vision improved significantly only in FS-LASIK (<0.001) and not in SMILE (=0.58). There was more postoperative astigmatism in SMILE in comparison with FS-LASIK (=0.002).
In a real-life situation, patients with preoperative dry eye experience were often directed to the SMILE operation, which resulted in beneficial decrease in their dry eye symptoms. Patient satisfaction with far vision decreased with increasing dry eye symptoms and postoperative astigmatism in both SMILE- and FS-LASIK-treated emmetropic patients. Safety, efficacy, and predictability were comparable in both treatments.
在现实情况研究中比较飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)和小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)治疗近视后影响患者满意度的因素。
SMILE组包括100只眼(51例患者),FS-LASIK组包括200只眼(102例患者)。除临床检查外,还报告了干眼症状以及患者对远视力和近视力的满意度,并在术前和术后1个月采用视觉模拟量表进行评分。从接受FS-LASIK治疗的患者中为SMILE患者选择病例对照配对,以确保等效球镜度、术前干眼和视觉满意度方面的同质性。
80%的SMILE术眼和83%的FS-LASIK术眼裸眼远视力达到20/20或更好。SMILE的可预测性(平均目标等效球镜度±0.5D)为91%,FS-LASIK为93.5%。没有术眼矫正远视力下降两行或更多行。基于病例对照配对,与术前情况相比,接受FS-LASIK治疗的术眼1个月后干眼症状保持不变(P = 0.87),而接受SMILE治疗的术眼干眼症状减轻(P = 0.01)。两组患者对远视力的满意度均显著提高(P < 0.001),但仅FS-LASIK组患者对近视力的满意度显著提高(P < 0.001);SMILE组患者对近视力的满意度无显著变化(P = 0.