Zhang Ying-Tao, Guo Xiao-Qin, Callahan Johnny D, Yuan Gui-Li, Zhang Gui-Hong, Chen Yao, Zhang Hai-Bing, Pulscher Laura A, Lu Jia-Hai, Gray Gregory C
Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health (Y-T Zhang, Guo, Yuan, Lu), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Key Laboratory for Tropical Diseases Control of Ministry of Education (Lu), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2018 Nov;30(6):848-854. doi: 10.1177/1040638718800357. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a highly contagious respiratory virus causing severe morbidity in pigs worldwide. Control strategies for PRRSV often rely on detecting PRRSV, culling or isolating sick pigs, disinfecting pig barns, vaccination, and monitoring for virus spread. Given the high economic impact of PRRSV on pig farms, there is a great need for rapid and reliable PRRSV detection assays. We compared the performance of 2 commercial reverse-transcription real-time PCR (RT-rtPCR) assays, the VetMAX PRRSV NA and EU reagents (ABI assay) and the PRRSV general RT-rtPCR kit (Anheal assay), for the molecular detection of PRRSV in sera collected from pigs in China. Between June and September 2015, sera were collected from 219 healthy and 104 suspected PRRSV-infected pigs on 4 farms in China. Employing blinding, the 2 assays were run by 2 laboratories (Guangzhou Animal Health Inspection Institute [GAHII] and Sun Yat-sen University [SYSU] laboratories) and compared. Although both assays detected PRRSV with 100% specificity at both laboratories, the sensitivity (95% vs. 78% at GAHII; 94% vs. 72% at SYSU Laboratory) and the reproducibility (kappa value 0.933 vs. 0.931) were slightly better for the ABI assay compared to the Anheal assay.
猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)是一种高度传染性的呼吸道病毒,在全球范围内导致猪的严重发病。PRRSV的防控策略通常依赖于检测PRRSV、扑杀或隔离病猪、对猪舍进行消毒、接种疫苗以及监测病毒传播。鉴于PRRSV对养猪场的巨大经济影响,迫切需要快速可靠的PRRSV检测方法。我们比较了两种商业逆转录实时PCR(RT-rtPCR)检测方法,即VetMAX PRRSV NA和欧盟试剂(ABI检测法)以及PRRSV通用RT-rtPCR试剂盒(安和检测法),用于对从中国猪群采集的血清中PRRSV进行分子检测。2015年6月至9月期间,从中国4个猪场的219头健康猪和104头疑似感染PRRSV的猪中采集血清。采用盲法,由两个实验室(广州动物卫生监督所[GAHII]和中山大学[SYSU]实验室)进行这两种检测方法并进行比较。尽管两种检测方法在两个实验室中检测PRRSV的特异性均为100%,但与安和检测法相比,ABI检测法的灵敏度(GAHII分别为95%和78%;SYSU实验室分别为94%和72%)和重复性(kappa值0.933对0.931)略好。