Massey Douglas S, Tannen Jonathan
Princeton University, NJ, USA.
Ethn Racial Stud. 2018;41(9):1594-1611. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1312010. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Analysis of trends in the suburbanization of whites, blacks, Asians, and Hispanics reveal that all groups are becoming more suburbanized, though the gap between whites and minorities remains large. Although central cities have made the transition to a majority-minority configuration, suburbs are still overwhelmingly white. Levels of minority-white segregation are nonetheless lower in suburbs than cities. Blacks remain the most segregated group at both locations. Black segregation and isolation levels are declining in cities and suburbs, however, while Hispanic and Asian segregation levels have remained stable and spatial isolation levels have risen. Multivariate analyses suggest that Hispanics achieve desegregation indirectly by using socioeconomic achievements to gain access to less-segregated suburban communities and directly by translating r status attainments into residence in white neighborhoods. Blacks do not achieve desegregation indirectly through suburbanization and they are much less able than Hispanics to use their socioeconomic attainments directly to enter white neighborhoods.
对白人、黑人、亚裔和西班牙裔的郊区化趋势分析表明,尽管白人与少数族裔之间的差距仍然很大,但所有群体都在变得更加郊区化。虽然中心城市已经过渡到少数族裔占多数的结构,但郊区仍然以白人为主。尽管如此,郊区的少数族裔与白人的隔离程度低于城市。黑人在这两个地方仍然是隔离程度最高的群体。然而,城市和郊区的黑人隔离和孤立程度正在下降,而西班牙裔和亚裔的隔离程度保持稳定,空间隔离程度有所上升。多变量分析表明,西班牙裔通过利用社会经济成就进入隔离程度较低的郊区社区间接实现种族融合,并通过将地位成就转化为在白人社区居住直接实现种族融合。黑人无法通过郊区化间接实现种族融合,而且他们比西班牙裔更难直接利用社会经济成就进入白人社区。