• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术联合辅助放疗与放疗联合雄激素剥夺疗法治疗晚期前列腺癌的疗效比较。

Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy for men with advanced prostate cancer.

机构信息

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Urologic Oncology Program, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

出版信息

Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;124(20):4010-4022. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31726. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.31726
PMID:30252932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6234085/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Men with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPCa) or regionally advanced prostate cancer (RAPCa) are at high risk for death from their disease. Clinical guidelines support multimodal approaches, which include radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by radiotherapy (XRT) and XRT plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, there are limited data comparing these substantially different treatment approaches. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, this study compared survival outcomes and adverse effects associated with RP plus XRT versus XRT plus ADT in these men.

METHODS

SEER-Medicare data were queried for men with cT3-T4N0M0 (LAPCa) or cT3-T4N1M0 (RAPCa) prostate cancer. Propensity score methods were used to balance cohort characteristics between the treatment arms. Survival analyses were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

From 1992 to 2009, 13,856 men (≥65 years old) were diagnosed with LAPCa or RAPCa: 6.1% received RP plus XRT, and 23.6% received XRT plus ADT. At a median follow-up of 14.6 years, there were 2189 deaths in the cohort, of which 702 were secondary to prostate cancer. Regardless of the tumor stage or the Gleason score, the adjusted 10-year prostate cancer-specific survival and 10-year overall survival favored men who underwent RP plus XRT over men who underwent XRT plus ADT. However, RP plus XRT versus XRT plus ADT was associated with higher rates of erectile dysfunction (28% vs 20%; P = .0212) and urinary incontinence (49% vs 19%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Men with LAPCa or RAPCa treated initially with RP plus XRT had a lower risk of prostate cancer-specific death and improved overall survival in comparison with those men treated with XRT plus ADT, but they experienced higher rates of erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence.

摘要

背景

局部晚期前列腺癌(LAPCa)或局部区域进展性前列腺癌(RAPCa)患者死于该疾病的风险较高。临床指南支持多模式方法,包括根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后放疗(XRT)和 XRT 加雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)。然而,比较这些差异很大的治疗方法的数据有限。本研究使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据,比较了这些患者中 RP 加 XRT 与 XRT 加 ADT 治疗的生存结果和不良反应。

方法

使用 SEER-医疗保险数据查询 cT3-T4N0M0(LAPCa)或 cT3-T4N1M0(RAPCa)前列腺癌患者。使用倾向评分方法平衡治疗组之间的队列特征。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 比例风险模型分析生存分析。

结果

1992 年至 2009 年,共有 13856 名(≥65 岁)男性被诊断为 LAPCa 或 RAPCa:6.1%接受 RP 加 XRT,23.6%接受 XRT 加 ADT。在中位随访 14.6 年后,队列中有 2189 人死亡,其中 702 人死于前列腺癌。无论肿瘤分期或 Gleason 评分如何,接受 RP 加 XRT 的男性与接受 XRT 加 ADT 的男性相比,调整后的 10 年前列腺癌特异性生存率和 10 年总生存率都有优势。然而,RP 加 XRT 与 XRT 加 ADT 相比,与更高的勃起功能障碍发生率(28%比 20%;P=0.0212)和尿失禁发生率(49%比 19%;P<0.001)相关。

结论

与接受 XRT 加 ADT 的患者相比,初始接受 RP 加 XRT 治疗的 LAPCa 或 RAPCa 患者死于前列腺癌特异性死亡的风险较低,总生存状况得到改善,但勃起功能障碍和尿失禁的发生率较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a82/6234085/27d89ab983a4/nihms-983576-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a82/6234085/e4b693ec169c/nihms-983576-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a82/6234085/27d89ab983a4/nihms-983576-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a82/6234085/e4b693ec169c/nihms-983576-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a82/6234085/27d89ab983a4/nihms-983576-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy for men with advanced prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术联合辅助放疗与放疗联合雄激素剥夺疗法治疗晚期前列腺癌的疗效比较。
Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;124(20):4010-4022. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31726. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
2
Survival and secondary interventions following treatment for locally-advanced prostate cancer.局部晚期前列腺癌治疗后的生存情况及二次干预措施
Can J Urol. 2018 Oct;25(5):9516-9524.
3
Effectiveness of androgen-deprivation therapy and radiotherapy for older men with locally advanced prostate cancer.雄激素剥夺疗法与放射疗法对老年局部晚期前列腺癌患者的疗效
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):716-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2743. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
4
Improved Survival With Prostate Radiation in Addition to Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Men With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer.新诊断转移性前列腺癌患者接受雄激素剥夺治疗联合前列腺放射治疗可提高生存率。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2835-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4788. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
5
Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术与外照射放疗的长期生存比较。
Cancer. 2011 Jul 1;117(13):2883-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25900. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
6
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.EAU 前列腺癌指南。第二部分:晚期、复发性和去势抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):467-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
7
Patient-Reported Outcomes Through 5 Years for Active Surveillance, Surgery, Brachytherapy, or External Beam Radiation With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.局部前列腺癌主动监测、手术、近距离放疗或外照射放疗联合或不联合雄激素剥夺治疗 5 年的患者报告结局。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):149-163. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20675.
8
Optimal PSA Threshold for Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer following Radical Prostatectomy and Adjuvant Radiation Therapy.根治性前列腺切除术和辅助放疗后前列腺癌患者接受雄激素剥夺治疗的最佳 PSA 阈值。
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Aug;61(8):652-659. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.8.652.
9
20-Year survival after radical prostatectomy as initial treatment for cT3 prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术治疗 cT3 前列腺癌 20 年生存。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1709-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11372.x. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
10
Oncologic outcome of radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy as primary treatment for high and very high risk localized prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术与放疗作为高风险和极高风险局限性前列腺癌的主要治疗方法的肿瘤学结果。
Prostate. 2021 Mar;81(4):223-230. doi: 10.1002/pros.24089. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgery versus radiation for clinically positive nodal prostate cancer in an other cause mortality risk weighted cohort.手术与放疗治疗其他原因死亡风险加权队列中临床淋巴结阳性前列腺癌的比较
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Mar;57(3):825-837. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04253-9. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
Efficacy and safety evaluation of androgen deprivation therapy-based combinations for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于雄激素剥夺疗法的联合治疗转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌的疗效和安全性评价:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2024 Nov;131(8):1363-1377. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02823-3. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Morbidity and Mortality of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Population Based Analysis Comparing Radical Prostatectomy versus External Beam Radiation.局部晚期前列腺癌的发病率和死亡率:比较根治性前列腺切除术与外照射放疗的基于人群的分析。
J Urol. 2017 Nov;198(5):1061-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.05.073. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
Discerning the survival advantage among patients with prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: The limitations of cancer registry data.辨别接受根治性前列腺切除术或放疗的前列腺癌患者的生存优势:癌症登记数据的局限性。
Cancer. 2017 May 1;123(9):1617-1624. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30506. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Risk factors for prostate-specific antigen persistence in pT3aN0 prostate cancer after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective study.
机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后pT3aN0前列腺癌患者前列腺特异性抗原持续存在的危险因素:一项回顾性研究
J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023 Oct;40(4):412-418. doi: 10.12701/jyms.2023.00234. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
4
Radiation therapy compared to radical prostatectomy as first-line definitive therapy for patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.对于高危局限性前列腺癌患者,放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术作为一线确定性治疗的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arab J Urol. 2022 Mar 30;20(2):71-80. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2026010. eCollection 2022.
5
Survival after radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in clinical node-positive prostate cancer.临床淋巴结阳性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与放疗的生存比较。
Prostate. 2022 May;82(6):740-750. doi: 10.1002/pros.24317. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
Dose-escalated pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer in definitive or postoperative setting.在根治性或术后情况下,对前列腺癌进行剂量递增的盆腔放疗。
Radiol Med. 2022 Feb;127(2):206-213. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01435-8. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
7
Photothermal Therapy as Adjuvant to Surgery in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Human Fibrosarcoma.光热疗法作为人纤维肉瘤原位小鼠模型手术辅助治疗手段的研究
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 20;13(22):5820. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225820.
8
Characterizing Surgical and Radiotherapy Outcomes in Non-metastatic High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非转移性高危前列腺癌手术和放疗结果的特征:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2021 Aug 23;13(8):e17400. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17400. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Treatment Strategies for High-Risk Localized and Locally Advanced and Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.高危局限性、局部进展性和寡转移性前列腺癌的治疗策略
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 5;13(17):4470. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174470.
10
Comparative Survival Outcomes of High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy or Definitive Radiotherapy Regimens.根治性前列腺切除术或确定性放疗方案治疗高危前列腺癌的比较生存结果。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Feb 24;26:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.01.011. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Cancer Statistics, 2017.
《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-ESTRO-SIOG 前列腺癌诊治指南。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断及有治愈意图的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
5
Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016.前列腺癌临床实践指南(2016 年版)
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jan;14(1):19-30. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0004.
6
Survival Outcomes of Whole-Pelvic Versus Prostate-Only Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients With Use of the National Cancer Data Base.基于国家癌症数据库,高危前列腺癌患者采用全盆腔放疗与单纯前列腺放疗的生存结局比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Dec 1;93(5):1052-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
7
Outcomes for Patients with Clinical Lymphadenopathy Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的有临床淋巴结病患者的结果。
Eur Urol. 2016 Feb;69(2):193-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.047. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
8
Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013.1990 - 2013年局限性前列腺癌患者的管理趋势
JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):80-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6036.
9
Propensity Score Methods for Analyzing Observational Data Like Randomized Experiments: Challenges and Solutions for Rare Outcomes and Exposures.用于像随机实验一样分析观察性数据的倾向评分方法:罕见结局和暴露的挑战与解决方案
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun 15;181(12):989-95. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu469. Epub 2015 May 20.
10
US National Cancer Institute investigates PSA coding errors.美国国立癌症研究所对前列腺特异性抗原编码错误展开调查。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun;16(6):614. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70196-8. Epub 2015 Apr 30.